Nuclear Physics from the Quark Model with Chromodynamics

  • N. Isgur
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 27/1985)


It now seems nearly certain that nuclear physics can be derived from quantum chromodynamics. In these lectures I describe the ideas and methods underlying a possible route to such a derivation through the quark model, and some of the progress that has already been made along this path.


Quark Model Flux Tube Light Quark Strong Coupling Limit Adiabatic Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


References for Chapter 2

  1. 1.
    The idea of colour was introduced by O.W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 598.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. The idea that the strong interactions might be described by a non-Abelian gauge theory of colour originates in H. Fritzsch and M. Gell-Mann, Proc. XVI Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics (National Accelerator Laboratory, 1972) p. 135;Google Scholar
  3. H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. 74B (1973) 365;ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 494.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 2.
    For reviews of lattice gauge theories and calculations, see, for example, M. Bander, Physics Reports 75 (1981) 206;ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55 (1983) 775;ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Susskind, in Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions at High Energies, editors R. Balian and C.H. Llewellyn Smith (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).Google Scholar
  8. Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories were introduced via the SU(2) theory by J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 395.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 3.
    The flux tube picture described here was introduced in N. Isgur and J. Paton, Phys. Lett. 124B (1983) 247. A more complete discussion and references to related models may be found in N. Isgur and J. Paton, “A Flux Tube Model for Hadrons in QCD”, to appear in Phys. Rev. D.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.
    String theory has a venerable history: see, e.g., S. Mandelstam, Physics Reports 13C (1974) 261.ADSGoogle Scholar

References for Chapter 3

  1. 1.
    For a recent discussion of the “QCD-improved quark model” see, e.g., N. Isgur in Testing the Standard Model, AIP Conf. Proc., Vol. 81, editors C. Heusch and W.T. Kirk (American Inst. of Physics, New York, 1982), p.1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The semirelativistic treatment of \(q\bar q\) states can be found in S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, to appear in Phys. Rev. D. This paper has an extensive list of further references on mesons in the quark model.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The model of baryons discussed here was developed in collaboration with Gabriel Karl. For a pedagogical review of this model, see N. Isgur in The New Aspect of Subnuclear Physics, edited by A. Zichichi (Plenum, New York, 1980), p. 107 and references therein.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The relativized quark model for baryons can be found in S. Capstick and N. Isgur, University of Toronto preprint.Google Scholar

References for Chapter 4

  1. 1.
    The flux tube picture for multiquark states and its relation to the \(\vec F_i .\vec F_j \) model are discussed in Ref.4 of Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The \(qq\bar q\bar q\) system in the the \(\vec F_i .\vec F_j\) model is discussed in J. Weinstein and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 659;ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Phys. Rev. D27 (1983) 588. References to the \(qq\bar q\bar q\) literature can be found therein.ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    The suggestion that and δ are \(qq\bar q\bar q\) states originates with R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 267, 281;Google Scholar
  5. R.L. Jaffe and K. Johnson, Phys. Lett. 60B (1976) 201;ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 1444.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar

References for Chapter 5

  1. 1.
    K. Maltman and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1827;ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Phys. Rev. D29 (1984) 952.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    A partial history and a rather complete set of references to related work may be found in the latter of Refs.1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Isgur
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations