Advertisement

Functional Stereotactic Surgery Utilizing CT Data and Computer Generated Stereotactic Atlas

  • P. J. Kelly
  • B. Kall
  • S. Goerss
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 33)

Abstract

Stereotactic atlases attempt to relate the position of subcortical structures to intracranial landmarks detected by radiographic methods7,8. Considerable anatomic variability exists between individual brains. Subcortical structures have no consistent quantitative relationship to radiologically determined landmarks1,3. This variability increases in direct proportion to the distance the substructure lies from particular landmarks8.Although anterior-posterior and superior-inferior measurements from stereotactic atlases can be adjusted for variations in the intracommissural distance and thalamic height, there is no anatomical landmark detected by ordinary radiographic techniques which allows correction for medial lateral variability in the position of the internal capsule or the axial configuration of the thalamus and third ventricle. Fortunately, these structures are usually visualized on quality CT scans.

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulate Internal Capsule Subcortical Structure Display Terminal Stereotactic Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brierley, J., Beck, E., The signiflcance in human stereotactic brain surgery of individual Variation in the diencephalon and globus pallidus. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 22 (1959), 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goerss, S., Kelly, P. J., Kall, B., Alker, G. J., A computed tomographic stereotactic adaptation system. Neurosurgery 10 (1982), 375–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelly, P, Derome, P, Guiot, G, Thalamic spatial variability and the surgical results of lesions placed with neurophysiologic control. Surg. Neurol. 9 (1978), 307–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly, P. J, Microelectrode recording for the somatotopic placement of stereotactic thalamic lesions in the treatment of parkinsonian and cerebellar intention tremor. Appl. Neurophysiol. 43 (1980), 262–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kelly, P. J, Alker, G. J, Goerss, S, Computer-assisted stereotactic laser microsurgery for the treatment of intracranial neoplasms. Neurosurgery 10 (1982), 324–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly, P. J, Kall, B. A, Goerss, S, Stereotactic CT scanning for the biopsy of intracranial lesions and functional neurosurgery. Appl. Neurophysiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schaltenbrand, G, Wahren, W, Atlas for Stereotaxy of the Human Brain. Stuttgart: G. Thieme. 1977.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Buren, J, Maccubbin, D, An outline atlas of human basal ganglia with estimation of anatomical variants. J. Neurosurg. 19 (1962), 811–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Kelly
    • 1
  • B. Kall
    • 2
  • S. Goerss
    • 2
  1. 1.State University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Sisters of Charity HospitalBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations