Advertisement

Nuclear Control of Morphogenesis in Micrasterias

  • P. Kallio
  • J. Lehtonen
Part of the Cell Biology Monographs book series (CELLBIOL, volume 8)

Abstract

Morphogenesis lies under the control of the nucleus. But there must also be something to be controlled—the cytoplasm with its organelles. The roles played in morphogenesis by these two main cell components are to some degree independent of each other.

Keywords

Complex Cell Diploid Cell Binucleate Cell Double Cell Haploid Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonotto, S., Goutier, R., Kirchmann, R., Maisin, J.-R. (eds.), 1972: Biology and radio-biology of anucleate systems II. Plant cells. New York-London: Academic press.Google Scholar
  2. Brächet, J.,1970: Concluding Remarks. in: Biology of Acetabularia(Brächet, J., Bonotto, S., eds.), pp. 273–291. New York-London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Darlington, C. D., 1937: Recent advances in cytology. London-Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  4. Drawert, H., Mix, M., 1960: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. III. Mitteilung: Der Nucleolus im Interphasekern von Micrasterias rotata. Flora 150, 185–190.Google Scholar
  5. — — 1961 a: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. II. Mitteilung: Hüllgallerte und Schleimbildung bei Micrasterias, Pleurotaenium und Hyalotheca. Planta 56, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. — — 1961 b: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. IV. Mitteilung: Beiträge zur elektronenmikroskopischen Struktur des Interphasekerns von Micrasterias rotata. Z. Naturforsch. 16b, 546–551.Google Scholar
  7. — — 1961 c: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. V. Mitteilung: Über die Variabilität der Chloroplastenstruktur bei Micrasterias rotata. Planta 56, 648–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — — 1961 d: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen VII. Mitteilung: Der Golgi-Apparat von Micrasterias rotata nach Fixierung mit Kaliumpermanganat und Osmiumtetroxid. Mikroskopie 16, 207–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. — — 1961 e: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. VIII. Mitteilung: Die Chondriosomen von Micrasterias rotata. Flora 151, 487–508.Google Scholar
  10. — — 1962 a: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. IX. Mitteilung: Die Struktur der Pyrenoide von Micrasterias rotata. Planta 58, 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. — — 1962 b: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. X. Mitteilung: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der „Häutung” von Desmidiaceen. Arch. Mikrobiol. 42, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. — — 1962 c: Zur Frage von Struktur und Funktion des Golgi-Apparates in Pflanzenzellen. Sitzber. Ges. Beförd. ges. Naturwiss. Marburg 83/84, 361–382Google Scholar
  13. — — 1962 d: Zur Funktion des Golgi-Apparates in der Pflanzenzelle. Planta 58, 448–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. — — 1963: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Desmidiaceen. XI. Mitteilung: Die Struktur von Nucleolus und Golgi-Apparat bei Micrasterias denticulata Breb. Portugaliae Acta Biologica Ser. A 8, 17–28.Google Scholar
  15. Grönblad, R., Kallio, P., 1954: A new genus and a new species among the desmids. Botaniska Notiser 1954, 167–178.Google Scholar
  16. Hämmerling, J., 1943 a: Entwicklung und Regeneration von Acetabularia crenulata. Zschr. Ind. Abst. Vererb. 81, 85–113Google Scholar
  17. Hämmerling, J., 1943 b: Ein- und zweikernige Transplantate zwischen Acetabularia mediterranea und A. crenulata. Zschr. Ind. Abst. Vererb. 81, 114–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. — 1963: The role of the nucleus in differentiation especially inAcetabularia. Symp. Soc. Exper. Biol. 17, 127–137.Google Scholar
  19. Heimans, J., 1942: Triquetroes forms of Micrasterias. Blumea, Suppl. 2, 52–63.Google Scholar
  20. Jarosch, R., Kiermayer, O., 1962: Die Formbildung von Micrasterias-Zellen nach lokaler Lichteinwirkung. Planta 58, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kallio, P., 1949 : Artificially produced binuclear, diploid and anuclear desmids. Arch. Soc. “Vanamo” 2, 42–44.Google Scholar
  22. — 1951: The significance of nuclear quantity in the genusMicrasterias. Ann. Bot. Soc. “Vanamo” 24, 1–120.Google Scholar
  23. — 1953 a: On the morphogenetics of the desmids. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 80, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — 1953 b: The effect of continued illumination on the desmids. Arch. Soc. “Vanamo” 8, 58–74.Google Scholar
  25. — 1954: Morphogenetic studies in Micrasterias rotata var. evoluta Turner (Desmidiaceae). Arch. Soc. “Vanamo” 8, 118–122.Google Scholar
  26. — 1957: Studies on artificially produced diploid forms of someMicrasterias species (Desmidiaceae). Arch. Soc. “Vanamo” 11, 193–204.Google Scholar
  27. — 1959: The relationship between nuclear quantity and cytoplasmic units in Micrasterias. Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A, IV Biologica 44, 1–44.Google Scholar
  28. — 1960: Morphogenetics of Micrasterias americana in clone culture. Nature 187, 164–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — 1961: Mitotic cycles and mitogenesis in Micrasterias. Cytologia 26, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. — 1963: The effects of ultraviolet radiation and some chemicals on morphogenesis in Micrasterias. Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A, IV Biologica 70, 1–39.Google Scholar
  31. — 1968: On the morphogenetic system of Micrasterias sol. Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A, IV Biologica 124, 1–23.Google Scholar
  32. — Heikkilä, H., 1969: UV-induced facies change inMicrasterias torreyi. österr. Bot. Z. 116, 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. — Heikkilä, H., 1972: On the effect of elimination of nuclear control in Micrasterias. In: Biology and radiobiology of anucleate systems II. Plant cells (Bonotto, S., Goutier, R., Kirchmann, R., Maisin, J.-R., eds.), pp. 145–164. New York-London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. — Heikkilä, H., Lehtonen, J., 1973: On the plasmatic template system in Micrasterias morphogenesis. Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A, IV Biologica 199, 1–6.Google Scholar
  35. Kasprik, W., 1973: Beiträge zur Karyologie der Desmidiaceen-GattungMicrasterias Ag. Beitr. Nova Hedwigia 42, 115–137.Google Scholar
  36. Kiermayer, O., 1962: Die Rolle des Turgordrucks bei der Formbildung vonMicrasterias. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesellschaft 75, 77–81.Google Scholar
  37. — 1964: Untersuchungen über die Morphogenese und Zellwandbildung beiMicrasterias denticulata Breb. Protoplasma 59, 76–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. — 1965 a: Zur Mechanik der Formbildung von Micrasterias. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Gesellschaft 78.Google Scholar
  39. — 1965 b: Plasmatische Strukturen in experimentell hervorgerufenen Zellwandverdickungen vonMicrasterias denticulata Breb. Planta (Berl.) 66, 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. — 1966: Differenzierung und Wachstum von Micrasterias denticulata (Conjugatae). Institut für den wissenschaftlichen Film, Wissenschaftlicher Film C 924/1966(Göttingen).Google Scholar
  41. — 1967: Dictyosomes in Micrasterias and their division. J. Cell Biol. 35, 68 A.Google Scholar
  42. — 1968: The distribution of microtubules in differentiating cells ofMicrasterias denticulata Breb. Planta (Berl.) 83, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. — 1970 a: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zum Problem der Cytomorphogenese von Micrasterias denticulata Breb. Protoplasma 69, 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. — 1970 b: Causal aspects of cytomorphogenesis in Micrasterias. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 175, 686–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. — 1971: Elektronenmikroskopischer Nachweis spezieller cytoplasmatischer Vesikel bei Micrasterias denticulata Breb. Planta (Berl.) 96, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kiermayer, O., 1972: Beeinflussung der postmitotischen Kernmigration von Micrasterias denticulata Breb. durch das Herbizid Trifluralin. Protoplasma 75, 421–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. — 1973: Feinstrukturelle Grundlagen der Cytomorphogenese. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 86, 287–291.Google Scholar
  48. — Dobberstein, B., 1973: Membrankomplexe dictyosomaler Herkunft als „Matrizen” für die extraplasmatische Synthese und Orientierung von Mikrofibrillen. Protoplasma 77, 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kiermayer, O.,Fedtke, C., 1977: Strong anti-microtubule action of amiprophos-methyl (APM) in Micrasterias. Protoplasma 92, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. — Fedtke, C., Jarosch, R., 1962: Die Formbildung von Micrasterias rotata Ralfs, und ihre experimentelle Beeinflussung. Protoplasma 54, 382–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. KRieger, W., 1937: Die Desmidiaceen. Rabenhorts Kryptogamenflora XIII/2.Google Scholar
  52. Lacalli, T. C., 1975 a: Morphogenesis in Micrasterias I. Tip growth. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 33, 95–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. — 1975 b: Morphogenesis in Micrasterias II. Patterns of morphogenesis. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 33, 117–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. — 1976: Morphogenesis in Micrasterias III. The morphogenetic template. Protoplasma 88, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. — Acton, A. B., 1974: Tip growth in Micrasterias. Science 183, 665–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lehtonen, J., 1977: Morphogenesis in Micrasterias torreyi Bail. and M. thomasiana Arch. studied with UV microbeam irradiation and chemicals. Ann. Bot. Fennici 14, 165–190.Google Scholar
  57. Maröenko, E., 1968: The site of photoreactivation of reproductive ability in the alga Netrium as determined by explosure to a microbeam of visible light. Rad. Bot. 8, 325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Menge, U., Kiermayer, O., 1977: Dictyosomen von Micrasterias denticulata Breb. — ihre Größenveränderung während des Zellzyklus. Protoplasma 91, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mix, M., 1965: Zur Variationsbreite von Micrasterias swainei Hastings und Staurastrum leptocladum Nordst. sowie über die Bedeutung von Kulturversuchen für die Taxonomie der Desmidiaceen. Archiv für Mikrobiologie 51, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. — 1967: Zur Feinstruktur der Zellwände in der Gattung Penium (Desmidiaceae). Ber. dtsch. Bot. Ges. Bd. 80, 715–721.Google Scholar
  61. — 1973: Die Feinstruktur der Zell wände der Conjugaten und ihre systematische Bedeutung. Beitr. Nova Hedwigia 42, 179–194.Google Scholar
  62. Pickett-heaps, J. D., 1975: The green algae. Sunderland, Ma.: Sinauer Assoc.Google Scholar
  63. Pihakaski, K., Kallio, P., 1978: Effect of denucleation and UV-irradiation on the sub- cellular morphology in Micrasterias. Protoplasma 95, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pringsheim, E. G., 1930: Die Kultur von Micrasterias and Volvox. Arch. Protistenkunde 72, 1–47.Google Scholar
  65. Saito, N., Werbin, H., 1969 a: Evidence for a photoreactivating enzyme in higher plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 9, 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. — — 1969 b: Action spectrum for a DNA-photoreactivating enzyme isolated from higher plants. Rad. Bot. 9, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Selman, G. G., 1966: Experimental evidence for the nuclear control of differentiation in Micrasterias. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 16, 469–485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Stich, H., Plaut, W., 1958: The effect of ribosomes on protein synthesis in nucleated and enucleated fragments of Acetabularia. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 4, 119–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teiling, E., 1950: Radiation of Desmids, its origin and its consequences as regards taxonomy and nomenclature. Bot. Not. 150, 299–327.Google Scholar
  70. Tourte, M., 1972: Ultrastructural investigations on anucleate cells inMicrasterias fimbriata. Comparison to three-lobed actinomycin D treated cells. In: Biology and radiobiology of anucleate systems II. Plant cells (Bonotto, S., Goutier, R., Kirchmann, R., Maisin, J.-R., eds.), pp. 193–223. New York-London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. Ueda, K., Noguchi, T., 1976: Transformation of the Golgi-apparatus in the cell of a green alga, Micrasterias americana. Protoplasma 87, 1–3, 145–162.Google Scholar
  72. Waddington, C. H., 1962: New patterns in genetics and development. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Waren, H., 1926: Nahrungsphysiologische Versuche an Micrasterias rotata. Comm. Biol. Soc. Sci. Fenn. II, 8, 1–42.Google Scholar
  74. Waris, H., 1950 a: Cytophysiological studies on Micrasterias I. Nuclear and cell division. Phys. Plant. 3, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. — 1950 b: Cytophysiological studies on Micrasterias II. The cytoplasmic framework and its mutation. Phys. Plant. 3, 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. — 1951: Cytophysiological studies on Micrasterias III. Factors influencing the development of enucleate cells. Phys. Plant. 4, 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. — 1958: Splitting of the nucleus by centrifuging in Micrasterias. Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A, IV, Biologica 40, 1–20.Google Scholar
  78. — Kallio, P., 1957: Morphogenetic effects of diemical agents and nucleo-cytoplasmic relations in Micrasterias. Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A, IV, Biologica 37, 3–16.Google Scholar
  79. — — 1964: Morphogenesis in Micrasterias. Adv. in Morphogenesis 4, 45–80.Google Scholar
  80. — — 1972: Effects of enucleation on Micrasterias. In: Biology and radiobiology of anucleate systems II. Plant cells (Bonotto, S., Goutier, R., Kirchmann, R., Maisin, J.-R., eds.), pp. 137–144. New York-London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  81. — Kallio, P., Rouhiainen, I., 1970: Permanent and temporary changes in Micrasterias induced by gamma rays. Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A, IV, Biologica 167, 1–13.Google Scholar
  82. Werz, G., 1965: Determination and realization of morphogenesis inAcetabularia. In: Genetic control of differentiation. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 18, 185–203.Google Scholar
  83. Zetsche, K., 1966: Regulation der zeitlichen Aufeinanderfolge von Differenzierungsvorgängen bei Acetabularia. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 21 b, 375–379.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Kallio
    • 1
  • J. Lehtonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Botanical LaboratoryUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations