Advertisement

In Situ Strain Measurements in Libya

  • Karlheinz Schäfer
Part of the Rock Mechanics / Felsmechanik / Mécanique des Roches book series (ROCK, volume 9)

Abstract

For the first time, in situ rock strain measurements have been carried out in Libya. Except in Liberia there are no previous in situ stress results of the African continent north of the equator. In this paper I report the results of stress determinations at 26 sites that extend from the Tunisian-Libyan border to Derna/Cyrenaica in the north and to Ghadames and the Jufrah oasis in the south. The present rock strain has been determined by overcoring of strain gauges that were bonded to the rock surfaces. The range of rock ages selected for measurements was wide (Middle Triassic to Quaternary), but their lithologic character was similar (solid homogeneous micrites). The orientations of maximum and minimum horizontal stress revealed a consistency across large areas. Most stress values vary from 0–50 bars; many range between 50 and 150 bars, and at one site, the stress was tensile in all horizontal directions. At least three crustal domains in northern and central Libya can be defined by means of different in situ stress fields. The western Libyan stress domain extends from Tunisia into Libya and is terminated along a line that runs from Sabratah to Azizia, Bu Ngem and the Jabal Waddan east of the Hon graben. This western Libyan stress field has a NW — SE-oriented maximum compressive stress that is horizontal. To the east, the central Libyan stress domain has a NE — SW-directed horizontal maximum compressive stress component that incorporates the entire Sirte basin and major parts of Cyrenaica. A third in situ stress domain occurs along the Cyrenaican coastal area from Al Beda to the east. There, the stress field has a maximum compressive component of NW — SE-direction. It is suggested that Tripolitania and the eastern Cyrenaica and their lithospheric northern extensions are indenting the European plate in a northwestern direction corresponding to the drift direction of the African plate for the last 9 m. y. The Sirte basin is located between those framing indenters and was subjected to extensional tectonics during the late Mesozoic and most of the Tertiary, but may have been under NE — SW-directed horizontal compression since the late Neogene.

Keywords

Residual Stress Stress Field Strain Measurement Horizontal Stress Middle Triassic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burke, K., Wilson, J. T.: Is the African Plate Stationary ? Nature 239, 387–390 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, A. S.: The Barce (Al Marj) Earthquake of 1963. In: F. T. Barr (ed.), Geology and Archaeology of Northern Cyrenaica, Libya. Petrol. Explor. Soc. Libya, 10. annual field conf., 183–195 ( Holland-Breumelhof N. V. ), Amsterdam (1968).Google Scholar
  3. Carslaw, H. S., Jaeger, J. C.: Conduction of Heat in Solids. 2. ed., 510 pp. ( Clarendon Press ), London (1959).Google Scholar
  4. Conant, L. C., Goudarzi, G. H.: Geological Map of Libya, 1: 2 Mill., U. S. G. S., Misc. Geol. Invest. Map 1–350 A, Wash. D. C. (1964).Google Scholar
  5. Engelder, J. T., Sbar, M. L.: Evidence for Uniform Strain Orientation in the Potsdam Sandstone, Northern New York, From In Situ Measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 81, 3013–3017 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haimson, B., Fairhurst, C.: In-situ Stress Determination at Great Depth by Means of Hydraulic Fracturing in Rock Mechanics — Theory and Practice. Proc. 11. Symp. Rock Mechanics (ed. W. H. Somerton), Am. Inst. Mining Engineers, 559–584 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. Hooker, V. E., Duvall, W. I.: In Situ Rock Temperature — Stress Investigations in Rock Quarries. Bu-Mines Rept. of Inv. 7589, 12 pp. (1971).Google Scholar
  8. Leeman, E. R.: The “Doorstopper” and Triaxial Rock Stress Measuriug Instrument Developed by the C. S. I. R. J. S. Afr. Min. Metall. 69, 305–339 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. Pitman, W. C., Talwani, M.: Sea-Floor Spreading in the North Atlantic. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 83, 619–646 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ritsema, A. R.: The Contribution of the Study of Seismicity and Earthquake Mechanisms to the Knowledge of Mediterranean Geodynamic Processes. In: Progress in Geodynamics, Geodyn. Proj., Sci. Rep. 13, Borradaile et al. (eds.), 142–153 ( North Holland Pub. Co. ), Amsterdam (1975).Google Scholar
  11. Schäfer, K.: Geodynamik an Europas Plattengrenzen. Fridericiana 23, 3046 (1978).Google Scholar
  12. Schäfer, K.: Paleo-and Recent Stress Fields in Libya and Tunisia from the Cenozoic Structural Bearing. This volume (1980).Google Scholar
  13. Timoshenko, S., Goodier, J. M.: Theory of Elasticity, 2. ed., 506 pp., ( McGraw-Hill ), New York (1951).MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Turcotte, D. L., Oxburgh, E. R.: Stress Accumulation in the Lithosphere. Tectonophysics 35, 183–199 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karlheinz Schäfer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für GeowissenschaftenUniversität BayreuthBayreuthFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations