Methods of Artificial Intelligence and Computations in Physical Sciences
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 13/1974)
Even among its detractors , the subject of artificial intelligence (AI) is credited with advances in technique in non-numerical computing. As the value of this type of computing in physics in particular and physical sciences in general is now beyond doubt, it should be useful to see how work in physical sciences and in AI can be related. To begin, it is reasonable to ask two questions:
What is AI?
What implications does AI have for physical problems (and vice versa)?
KeywordsPhysical Science Feynman Rule Intelligent Behaviour Chess Position Symbolic Program
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.H. L. Dreyfus, “What Computers can’t do”, Harper and Row, New York (1972).Google Scholar
- 2.A. M. Turing, Mind 59, 433 (1950). For a short commentary on some other objections to Turing’s test, with references, see P. H. Millar, Mind 82, 595 (1973).Google Scholar
- 5.A. Samuel, IBM J. Res. Develop. 11, 601 (1967).Google Scholar
- 7.J. McCarthy et al., “LISP 1.5 Programmer’s Manual”, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1965).Google Scholar
- 9.H. C. Longuet-Higgins, A. Ortony, in “Machine Intelligence 3” (ed. D. Michie ), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1968), p. 311.Google Scholar
- 10.C. Hewitt, in “Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence”, British Computer Society, London (1971), p. 167.Google Scholar
- 11.J. R. Slagle,“Artificial Intelligence”, McGraw-Hill, New York (1971).Google Scholar
- 12.N. J. Nilsson, “Problem-Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence”, McGraw-Hill, New York (1971).Google Scholar
- 13.D. Lurié, in “Computing as a Language of Physics”, International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna (1972), p. 529; A. C. Hearn, ibid., p. 567.Google Scholar
- 15.S. Amarel, in “Machine Intelligence 3” (ed. D. Michie ), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1968), p. 131.Google Scholar
- 20.Global claims for the scope of.AI are not now heard outside stories by science-fiction writers; Nilsson’s operational definition of AI reflects the new modesty which is abroad in the subject (N.J.Nilsson, in “Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence”, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (1973), p.XIII.).Google Scholar
© Springer-Verlag 1974