Advertisement

Computer Display of Stereotaxic Brain Maps and Probe Tracts

  • G. Bertrand
  • A. Olivier
  • C. J. Thompson
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 21)

Abstract

Sooner or later, neurosurgeons engaged in stereotaxic surgery wish to plot on some type of brain atlas the position of their probe tracts or their therapeutic lesions. This is made difficult by the fact that the patient’s brain usually differs from the “standard” atlas brain in its dimensions and one wonders, then, how to match the two. Should one align the anterior commissures, the posterior commissures, the foramina of Monro, the mid commissural points, etc.? Should one use only proportionate measurements? Or use different atlases for brains of different sizes?

Keywords

Anterior Commissure Montreal Neurological Institute Brain Atlas Posterior Commissure Probe Tract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barcia-Salorio, J. L., Martinez Corrillo, J. A. (1969), Calculation of the target point by means of an analogue field plotter, in: Third Symposium on Parkinson’s Disease ( F. J. Gillingham and I. M. L, Donaldson, eds.), pp. 223–232. London: E. & S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates, J. A. V., Brewer, A. (1968), Geometric aspects of stereotaxic surgery. London: (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, D. (1966), A stereotaxic principle using a non mathematical three dimensional approach. Investigative Radiology 1 (cited by Dawson, B. H., et al.).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertrand, G., Jasper, H., Wong, A., Mathews, G. (1969), Microelectrode recording during stereotaxic surgery. Clin. Neurosurg. 16, 328–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawson, B. H., Derrin, E., Heywood, O. B. (1968/69), Bio-engineering approach to stereotaxic surgery of the brain. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 183, 281–297.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deimos, A., Pertuiset, B. (1959), Topométrie cranio-encéphalique chez l’homme. Paris: Masson. Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C Thomas.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassler, R. (1959), Anatomy of the thalamus. In: Introduction to Stereotaxy with an atlas of the human brain, vol. 1, pp. 230–290 ( Schaltenbrand, G., and Bailey, P., eds.). Stuttgart: G. Thieme.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peluso, F., Gybels, J. (1969), Computer calculation of two-target trajectory with “centre of area target” stereotaxic equipment. Acta neurochir. 21, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peluso, F., Gybels, J. (1970), Calculation of position of electrode point during penetra- tion in human brain. Confin. Neurol. 32, 213–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peluso, F., Gybels, J. Computer calculation of the position of the side-protruding electrode tip during penetration in human brain (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riechert, T., Mundinger, F. (1959), Stereotaxic instruments. In: Introduction to stereotaxy with an atlas of the human brain. Vol. 1, pp. 437–471 ( Schaltenbrand, B., and Bailey, P., eds.). Stuttgart: G. Thieme.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spiegel, E. A., Wycis, H. T. (1952), Stereocencephalotomy (thalamotomy and related procedures). Part I: Methods and stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Talairach, J., David, M., Tournoux, P., Corredor, H., Kvasina, T. (1957), Atlas d’anatomie stéréotaxique. Repérage radiologique indirect des noyaux gris centraux des régions mésencéphalo-sous-optique et hypothalamique de l’homme. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Bertrand
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Olivier
    • 1
  • C. J. Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Montreal Neurological Institute and HospitalCanada
  2. 2.Montreal 112Canada

Personalised recommendations