Advertisement

A Simple Approach to the Reggeisation of Photoproduction

  • E. Leader
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 8/1971)

Abstract

The theory of the Reggeisation of photonic processes is in a very peculiar state, despite the appearance of many papers on the subject. The problem of Gauge Invariance, the question of whether the π pole is kinematical or dynamical and the singularity of the Regge residue combine to produce a situation in which the usual “rules for Reggeisation” lead to unsatisfactory results.

Keywords

Feynman Diagram Gauge Invariance Helicity Amplitude Residue Function Dynamical Singularity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1a).
    G. Zweig, Nuovo Cimento, 32, 689 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (1b).
    S. Frautschi and L. Jones, Phys. Rev. 163, 1820 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (1c).
    J. P. Adler and M. Capdeville, Nucl. Phys. 83, 637 (1967)Google Scholar
  4. (1d).
    J. S. Ball, W. R. Frazer and M. Jacob, P.R.L. 20, 518 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (1e).
    K. Dietz and W. Korth, Phys. Letts. 26B, 394 (1968)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. (1f).
    F. S. Henyey, Phys. Rev. 170, 1619 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (1g).
    T. Ebata and K. E. Lassila, Phys. Rev. 183, 1425 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (1h).
    H. F. Jones, M. D. Scadron and F. D. Gault, Nuovo Cimento 66A, 424 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (1i).
    P. D. B. Collins and F. D. Gault, Durham University Preprint, March 1970.Google Scholar
  10. (1j).
    N. Dombey, Phys. Letts. 30B, 646 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 2.
    Compare e.g. Refs. 1(a), 1 (g), 1(h) and 1(i).Google Scholar
  12. 3.
    We are working in the Lorentz gauge. It should be noted, when we come later to talk about Feynman diagrams, that a one-to-one correspondence between a diagram and a mathematical expression exists if and only if the Gauge is specified. The diagrams have no independent meaning until the Gauge is chosen. This fact is often overlooked and can lead to confusion.Google Scholar
  13. 4.
    The strongest argument against a fixed pole is a phenomenological one, (which is thus really relevant to photoproduction from nucleons with spin, and not to the artificial case being considered here) namely that if a fixed pole at J=0 exists we would get da/dtas-2, whereas experimentally s2 da/dt seems to be decreasing with increasing s.Google Scholar
  14. 5.
    For a review of the problem of Daughters and Conspiracies see: E. Leader, Boulder Summer School Lectures (1969).Google Scholar
  15. 6.
    J. S. Ball and M. Jacob, Nuovo Cimento 54A, 620 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 7.
    M. Gell-Mann, M. L. Goldberger, F. E. Low, E. Marx and F. Zachariasen, Phys. Rev. 133B, 145 (1964).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 8.
    It is of interest to note that eqs. (55) when added together, are exactly equivalent to the superconverence relation, of M. B. Halpern, Phys. Rev. 160, 1441 (1967).Google Scholar
  18. 9.
    See Ref. 1(e). Further work along these lines is being carried out in collaboration with J. Hanzal and P. G. Williams.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Leader
    • 1
  1. 1.Westfield CollegeLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations