There appears to be a great deal of varied opinions in regard to the types of ecological systems required in manned space vehicles. In order to logically discuss designs of various ecological systems we must first establish some general operational requirements for the space systems concerned. The integrated space systems approach dictates the necessity of looking at each subsystem in relation to the whole. In most cases there are many different types of subsystems that could be used to satisfy a particular requirement. Therefore, in considering a total space ecological system the various combinations of subsystems actually number into the thousands. From a practical point of view, it would be impossible time wise and economically impractical to perfect this large number of systems. We must review the existing and proposed subsystems and rate them in such a manner so that we are able to meet the particular mission requirement. Ecological systems can be divided into three general mission or vehicle categories, i.e.,orbital systems, lunar systems, and interplanetary systems. If we consider our present propulsion capabilities then we are relegated to a fairly small manned orbital system and manned lunar and interplanetary systems would be essentially non-existent. If, however, we project our studies into the future when larger and/or more powerful propulsion devices (e.g. nuclear) will become available, then we can determine requirements for these three types of vehicles.


Ecological System Space Vehicle Order Item Cabin Pressure Crew Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    E. B. Konecci, Proceedings of the Lunar and Planetary Colloquium, 1, No. 6 (1959). ( Published Courtesy of Missile Division, North American Aviation Company. )Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Hull, Space—The Key to This Market is NASA, Missile Design and Development, 7, 24 (1960).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. B. Konecci, R. F. Trapp and M. W. Hunter, Aero Space Engineering (January 1960).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. F. Trapp, M. W. Hunter and E. B. Konecci, Acro Space Engineering (February 1960).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. W. Hunter, IV. E. Matheson and R. F. Trapp, Proceed. XI Int. Astronautical Congr., 1, 97 (1960).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. B. Konecci, Systems Approach to Ecological Systems, in preparation (1960).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. S. Johnston, IAS 28th Annual Meeting, New York City (25–27 January 1960 ).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. B. Konecci and N. E. Wood, Douglas Aircraft Company Engineering Paper No. 861 (November 1960).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. B. Jackson, G. Roush Jr. and R. M. Bogard, IAS, NASA and Rand Manned Space Station Symposium, Los Angeles, California (April 20–22, 1960 ).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. B. Konecci and R. F. Trapp, Aero Space Medicine, 30, 87 (1959).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. F. Trapp and E. B. Konecci, Douglas Aircraft Company Engineering Paper No. 808 (1959).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. E. Arnoldi, WADD Closed Circuit Respiratory Systems Symposium, Dayton, Ohio (April 28–29, 1960 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene B. Konecci
    • 1
  1. 1.Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc.Santa MonicaUSA

Personalised recommendations