The Macula pp 253-260 | Cite as

Standards of reading performance and visual acuity measurements in maculopathy-reliability and validity analyses of vision tests

  • W. Radner
  • E. Stifter
  • S. Richter-Mueksch
  • Ch. Kiss
  • M. Velikay-Parel


Determination of visual performance is one of the most important clinical examinations in ophthalmology. Thus, the results of vision tests have to be accurate, reproducible, and comparable. To achieve this, the testing parameters of the various measurement procedures have to be uniformly standardized [12, 14, 15, 18, 33, 45] for both distance acuity and reading performance.


Visual Acuity Reading Speed Variance Component Analysis Distance Acuity Anisometropic Amblyopia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahn S, Legge G, Luebker A (1995) Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed. Vision Res 35: 1939–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahn S, Legge G (1995) Psychophysics of reading-XIII. Predictors of magnifier aided reading speed in low vision. Vision Res 35: 1931–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arditi A, Cagenello R (1993) On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34: 120–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bach M, Kommerell G (1998) Sehschärfenbestimmung nach Europäischer Norm: wissenschaftliche Grundlagen and Möglichkeiten der automatischen Messung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 212: 190–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 53: 745–53Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1980) The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57: 378–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR (1991) Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32: 422–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bland JM, Altmann DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown B, Yap MKH (1995) Differences in visual acuity between the eyes: determination of normal limits in a clinical population. Ophthal Physiol Opt 15: 163–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bullimore MA, Bailey IL (1995) Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. Optom Vis Sci 72 (2): 125–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Camparini M, Cassinari P, Ferrigno L, Macaluso C (2001) ETDRS-Fast: Implementing psychophysical adaptive methods to standardized visual acuity measurement with ETDRS-Charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1226–31Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CEN (European Committee of Norms) (1996) Europäische Norm Sehschärfenprüfung EN ISO 8596. Berlin: Beuth-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chung STL, Mansfield JS, Legge GE (1998) Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research 38: 2949–62Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Colenbrander A (1988) Consilium Ophthalmologicum Universale Visual Functions Committee, Visual Acuity Measurement Standard. Ital J Ophthalmol 11: 5–19Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    DIN 58220 “Sehschärfenbestimmung” Teil 3, 5 and 6 (1997) Beuth Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elliott D, Patel B, Whitaker D (2001) Development of a reading speed test for potential-vision measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1945–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ergun E, Maar N, Radner W, Barbazetto I, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Stur M (2003) Scotoma Size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 110: 65–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ferris F, Kassoff A, Bresnick G, Bailey I (1982) New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94: 91–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferris F, Sperduto R (1982) Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94: 97–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friedmann S, Munoz B, Rubin G, West S, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried L (1999) Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measuring reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40: 858–64Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Geer I, Westall CA (1996) A comparison of tests to determine acuity deficits in children with amblyopia. Ophthal Physiol Opt 16: 367–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hazel CA, Petre KL, Armstrong RA, Benson MT, Frost NA (2000) Visual function and subjective quality of life compare in subjects with acquired macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 1309–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    John PWM (1971) Statistical design and analysis of experiments. New York: The Macmillan CompanyGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM (1985) Psychophysics of reading— II. Low vision. Vision Res 25: 253–66Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, LaMay JM (1989) Psychophysics of reading VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci 66: 843–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Legge G, Ross J, Isenberg L, LaMay J (1992) Psychophysics of reading — XII: Clinical Predictors of low vision reading speed. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33: 667–72Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lovie-Kitchin JE (1988) Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Ophthal Physiol Opt 8: 363–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mackensen G (1962) Die Untersuchung der Lesefähigkeit als klinische Funktionsprüfung. Fortschr Augenheilkd 12: 344–79Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Macular Photocoagulation Study Group (1982) Argon laser photocoagulation for senile macular degeneration: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol 100: 912–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Macular Photocoagulation Study Group (1986) Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy: Three year results from randomized clinical trials. Arch Ophthalmol 104: 694–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mansfield J, Ahn S, Legge G, Luebker A (1993) A new reading-acuity chart for normal and low vision. Opt Soc Am Techn Digest 3: 232–5Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, Schein OD, Quigley HA, Bressler SB, Bandeen-Roche K, and the SEE Study Team (2000) Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans. Arch Ophthalmol 118: 819–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    NAS-NRC Committee on Vision (1980) Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Adv Ophthalmol 41: 103–48Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Osarovsky-Sasin E, Richter-Mueksch S, Pfleger T, Stiffer E, Velikay-Parel M, Radner W (2002) Reduced Reading ability of eyes with anisometropic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: Abstract 4691. ARVO 2002Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Patel B, Elliott DB, Whitaker D (2001) Optimal reading speed in simulated cataract: development of a potential vision test. Ophthal Physiol Opt 21: 272–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pesudovs K, Patel B, Bradbury JA, Elliott DB (2002) Reading speed test for potential central vision measurement. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 30: 183–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Mueksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B (2002) The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240: 461–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, Mudrich C, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B (1998) [A new German Reading Chart for the simultaneous evaluation of reading acuity and speed] [Article in German] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 213: 174–81Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Richter-Mueksch S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C, Velikay-Parel M, Radner W (2002) Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28: 1957–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rubin G, West S, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Zeger S, Schein O, Fried L (1997) A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Eye Evaluation Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38: 557–68Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rubin GS, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, West S (2000) Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability. The SEE Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 3327–34Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sloan L, Rowland WM, Altmann A (1952) Comparison of three types of test target for the measurement of visual acuity. Q Rev Ophthalmol 8: 4–16Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sloan LL (1959) New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. Am J Ophthalmol 48: 807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stangler-Zuschrott E (1990) [Decreased reading speed and rapid fatigue as signs of disordered visual function] [Article in German] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 196:150–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wesemann W (2000) [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FVT), Bailey Lovie Chart and Landolt Ring Chart] [Article in German] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 219:660–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    West S, Munoz B, Rubin G, Schein O, Bandeen-Roche K, Zeger S, German S, Fried L (1997) Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE Eye Evaluation Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38: 72–82Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Turano K (2002) How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life. Arch Ophthalmol 120: 774–80PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Radner
    • 1
  • E. Stifter
    • 1
  • S. Richter-Mueksch
    • 1
  • Ch. Kiss
    • 1
  • M. Velikay-Parel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology and OptometryUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations