The Macula pp 95-100 | Cite as

Subfoveal neovascular membranes — membrane morphology and outcome after combined subretinal surgery and autologous RPE transplantation

  • Adele Assadoullina
  • H. Feichtinger
  • S. Binder
  • A. Abri


Purpose: We have recently described combined subretinal surgery and simultaneous autologous transplantation of RPE as a therapeutic option for the treatment of CNV in patients with advanced AMD. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the size and morphology of the membranes were correlated with patient outcome.

Methods: We examined 19 AMD patients, which underwent combined subretinal surgery and autologous transplantation of RPE. All patients had improved or stabilized visual acuity in follow-up after surgery. The membranes were prepared for conventional histology and evaluated for their morphological composition on serial sections applying a semiquantitative score of 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+ to the following parameters: amount of acellular matrix, neovascularization/microvascular density (MVD), cellularity with special reference to inflammatory cells, and presence of RPE. These data including membrane size as determined preoperatively by fluorescein angiography (FLA) were correlated with postoperative visual acuity.

Results: By preoperative FLA all lesions were classified as clinically predominantly occult. Regarding postoperative outcome we divided all patients in two groups. Group I with visual improvement of 2 and more lines comprised 7 patients, and group Il with unchanged/stabilized visual acuity of +/−1 line the remaining 12 patients. Mean membrane size was 6,19 +/− 1,33 mm in the group of patients with, and 6,41 +/− 1,87 in the group without visual improvement, respectively. Recurrences did not occur.

Histology: All 19 membranes contained a significant amount of acellular matrix (scores 2+/3+); a prominent neovascularization/high MVD was present in 13/19 specimens and was usually associated with a high degree of cellularity, i.e. a moderate or marked inflammatory component predominated by lymphocytes (14/19). 6/19 membranes presented as minimally vascularized and acellular scars. In 15/19 cases a significant amount of RPE cells was present in the excised membranes; this prevalence was especially high in the group II.

Outcome: When compared to the development of visual acuity after therapy, neither FLA findings, nor histopathologic features of the membranes were predictive.

Conclusion: In a pilot study of 19 patients with advanced AMD/CNV treated with combined subretinal surgery and autologous RPE transplantation features other than membrane morphology and membrane size seem to determine patient outcome. The tendency for a higher amount of RPE cells in the group with no improvement should be further investigated.


Visual Acuity Choroidal Neovascularization Visual Improvement Postoperative Visual Acuity Choroidal Neovascular Membrane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Evans J, Wormald R (1996) Is the incidence of registrable age-related macular degeneration increasing? Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1): 9–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macular Photocoagulation Study Group (1993) Five-year follow-up of fellow eyes of patients with age-related macular degeneration and unilateral extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol 111 (9): 1189–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Treatment of age-related macular degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study group (1999) Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: one-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials—TAP report. Arch Ophthalmol 1 17 (10): 1329–45Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berger AS, Kaplan HJ (1992) Clinical experience with the surgical removal of subfoveal neovascular membranes. Ophthalmology 99: 969–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binder S, Stolba U, Krebs I, Kellner L, Jahn C, Feichtinger H, Pavelka M, Frohner U, Kruger A, Hilgers RD, Krugluger W (2002) Transplantation of autologous retinal pigment epithelium in eyes with foveal neovascularization resulting from age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol 133 (2): 215–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Macular Photocoagulation Study Group (1994) Persistent and recurrent neovascularisation after laser photocoagulation for subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 112: 489–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmidt-Erfurth U, Michels S, Barbazetto I, Laqua H (2002) Photodynamic effects on choroidal neovascularization and physiological choroid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (3): 830–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas M, Dickinson J, Melberg N, et al (1996) Visual results after surgical removal of subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes. Ophthalmology 101: 1384–96Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stevens TS, Bressler NM, Maguire MG, Bressler SB, Fine SL, Alexander J, Phillips DA, Margherio RR, Murphy PL, Schachat AP (1997) Occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. A natural history study. Arch Ophthalmol 115 (3): 345–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Binder S, Krebs I, Stolba U, Jahn Ch, Kellner L, Feichtinger H, Abri A, Assadoullina A, Stanzel B (2003) Incidence of recurrent membrane growth after surgical excision of foveal choriodal neovascularization combined with transplantation of autologous retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (4): 20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adele Assadoullina
    • 1
  • H. Feichtinger
    • 2
  • S. Binder
    • 1
  • A. Abri
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Retinology and Biomicroscopic Laser Surgery, Department of OphthalmologyRudolf Foundation ClinicViennaAustria
  2. 2.Institute of Pathology and BacteriologyRudolf Foundation ClinicViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations