The Background of Temporal Logic

Part of the LEP Library of Exact Philosophy book series (LEP, volume 3)


The theory of temporal logic is an integral concern of philosophical inquiry, and questions of the nature of time and of temporal concepts have preoccupied philosophers since the inauguration of the subject. Kant wrote:

“The possibility of apodeictic principles concerning the relations of time, or of axioms of time in general, is also grounded upon this a priori necessity [of time as part of the framework of sensory experience]. [Examples of such apodeictic principles are:] Time has only one dimension; different times are not simultaneous but successive...” 1.


Temporal Logic Logical Theory Tense Logic Master Argument Polish Logician 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Critique of Pure Reason, A 31/B 47; tr. by N. K. Smith (New York, 1929 ), p. 75.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Zeller, Die Philosophie der Griechen, Pt. 3, vol. I (5th ed., Leipzig, 1923 );Google Scholar
  3. Benson Mates, Stoic Logic (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1953), see esp. pp. 36–41.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    I. M. Bochenski, La logique de Théophraste (Freiburg, 1947 ).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Mates, O. Lit., pp. 38–39. Cf. Jaakko Hintikka, Aristotle and the “Master Argument” of Diodorus, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 1 (1964), pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
  6. N. Rescher, A Version of the “Master Argument” of Diodorus, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 63 (1966), pp. 438–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Rescher, Truth and Necessity in Temporal Perspective, in idem, Essays in Philosophical Analysis (Pittsburgh, 1969 ).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Zeller, op. cit., pp. 97–99 (especially no. 1 for p. 97); relying also upon EMILE BRÉHIER, La théorie des incorporels dans l’ancien Stoicisme (2nd ed., Paris, 1928 ), p. 9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. RES Cher, Avicenna on the Logic of “Conditional” Propositions, in: Studies in the History of Arabic Logic (Pittsburgh, 1963 ), pp. 76–86.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Rescher, Temporal Modalities in Arabic Logic (Dordrecht, 1967 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. M. Bochenski, Notes historiques sur les propositions modales (Quebec, 1951 ), p. 7.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    C. Prantl, Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, vol. I (Leipzig, 1855; photoreprinted, Graz, 1955 ), p. 703, no. 150.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    E. A. Moody, Truth and Consequence in Medieval Logic (Amsterdam, 1953), pp. 53–57, 73–80, 97–100.Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    Martha Hurst Kneale, Implication in the Fourth Century B. C., Mind, vol. 44 (1935), pp. 485–495.Google Scholar
  15. Benson Mates, Diodorean Implication, The Philosophical Review, vol. 58 (1949), pp. 234–242; idem,Stoic Logic, op. cit.,ERNEST MOODY, op. cit. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 19.
    Hans Reichenbach, Elements of Symbolic Logic (New York, 1947).Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Jerzy Los, Podstawy Analizy Metodologicznej Kanonow Milla (Foundations of the Methodological Analysis of Mill’s Canons), Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio F, vol. 2 (for 1947, published in 1948 ), pp. 269–301.Google Scholar
  18. Henry Hiz, in: The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 16 (1951), pp. 58–59.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    N. Rescher and J. Garson, A Note on Chronological Logic, Theoria, vol. 33 (1967), pp. 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations