Skip to main content

Temporal Modality

  • Chapter
Temporal Logic

Part of the book series: LEP Library of Exact Philosophy ((LEP,volume 3))

  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

In classical antiquity, Diodorus Cronus defined the necessary as that which is and always will be the case, and correspondingly, defined the possible as that which is or will be the case1. Using our standard notation for necessity and possibility, we can express these definitions in a tense calculus by:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For a comprehensive treatment of modal logic the reader should consult G. E. Hughes and M. J. Cresswell, Introduction to Modal Logic ( London, Methuen and Co., 1968 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a proof, see Saul Kripke, Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I, Normal Propositional Calculi, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 9 (1963), pp. 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In his paper: Modal Systems in the neighborhood of T, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 5 (1965), pp. 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. N. Prior, Past, Present and Future, Oxford University Press (1967), pp. 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A proof of this is to be found in R. A. Bull, An Algebraic Study of Diodorean Modal Systems, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 33 (1968), pp. 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. This formulation of deontic S5 differs from the system 0S5 of T. J. Smiley [Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 28 (1963), pp. 113–134], and from D5 of E. J. Lemmon Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 22 (1957),pp. 176–186].

    Google Scholar 

  7. See A. N. Prior, Time and Modality, Oxford University Press (1957) and R.A. Bull, An Axiomatization of Prior’s Modal Calculus Q, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 5 (1964), pp. 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rescher, N., Urquhart, A. (1971). Temporal Modality. In: Temporal Logic. LEP Library of Exact Philosophy, vol 3. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7664-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7664-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7666-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7664-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics