Nonleptonic Hyperon Decays

  • D. Flamm
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 6/1969)


There has been quite some progress in recent years concerning nonleptonic hyperon decays. On the experimental side accurate measurements of the decay parameters have been performed from which the signs and magnitudes of all amplitudes have been determined. On the theoretical side, on the other hand, we now have a better understanding of strong interactions.


Vector Meson Baryon State Reduce Matrix Element Baryon Octet Equal Time Commutator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnotes and References

  1. 1.
    See for instance J. W. Cronin and O. E. Overseth, Phys. Rev. 123, 1795 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Källen, Elementarteilchenphysik (Hochschultaschenbücher-Verlag, 1965) p. 503.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Compare L. B. Okun, Weak Interaction of Elementary Particles (Pergamon Press Ltd., 1965), p.165.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. J. De Swart, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35. 916 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. D. Roper, R. M. Wright and B. T. Feld, Phys. Rev. 138, B190 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Barash-Schmidt et al. UCRL-8030 Pt.1 Jan.1969, Rev.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. P. Berge, Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Berkeley (1966), p. 47.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 155 (1964).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Sugawara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 31, 213 (1964).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Abbud and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 980 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. A. A. Belavin and I. M. Narodetzky, Phys. Lett. 26B, 668, (1968). The author would like to thank Dr. O. Nachtmann for bringing this reference to his attention.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    D. Flamm and W. Majerotto, “p-wave nonleptonic hyperon decays in the quark model”, to be published in the Proceedings of the Topical Conference on Weak Interactions, CERN, Geneva, Jan. 1969.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    We denote the quark doublet by p,n and the singlet by λ.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    One may also view this process as the inelastic scattering of an energy-momentum zero spurion on a quark to produce a meson.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    I. Ohba, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37, 1245 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. F. Chan, Nuovo Cimento 43, 236 (1967).Google Scholar
  17. S. Badier, Phys. Lett. 24B, 157 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Nakagawa and N. N. Trofimenkoff, Nuovo Cim. 52A, 961 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 15.
    W. Thirring, Acta Phys. Austriaca, Suppl. II, 205 (1966)Google Scholar
  20. R. van Royen and V. F. Weisskopf, Nuovo Cim. 50A, 617 (1967). To be conform with our phase convention the signs of the quark wave functions for π+,K°,K++ and Ξ° are opposite to the ones in the above references.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    An extensive compilation of references on nonleptonic hyperon decays up to 1967 can be found in.Google Scholar
  22. K. Fujii et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 38 (1967).Google Scholar
  23. 17.
    H. Sugawara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 870, 997 (1965).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 18.
    M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 986 (1965).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 19.
    M. Gell-Mann and M. Lévy, Nuovo Cim. 16, 705 (1960).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 20.
    See for instance L. S. Brown and C. M. Sommerfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 751 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 21.
    F. C. P. Chan, Phys. Rev. 171, 1543 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 22.
    H. J. Schnitzer, Phys. Rev. 158, 1471 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 23.
    M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 155 (1964).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. B. W. Lee and A. R. Swift, Phys. Rev. 136, B228 (1964).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 24.
    Compare S. A. Bludman, “Nonleptonic Weak Interactions”, 1966 Cargese Lectures.Google Scholar
  32. 25.
    Compare B. W. Lee, “Theory of Nonleptonic Hyperon Decays — A Survey” to be published in the Proceedings of the Topical Conference on Weak Interactions at CERN in January 1969.Google Scholar
  33. 26.
    M. L. Good and M. M. Nieto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 624 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 27.
    K. Nishijima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 40, 912 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 28.
    Y. Hara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37, 710 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 29.
    S. Nussinov and G. Preparata, Preprint SLAC-PUB-455.Google Scholar
  37. 30.
    See for instance C. Itzykson and M. Jacob, Nuovo Cim. 43A, 655 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 31.
    The argument persists if HW, contains a part which transforms like a 27-plet [18], [24].Google Scholar
  39. 32.
    A list of amplitudes including the I=1/2 27 contribution is, for instance, in ref. [26].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag / Wien 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Flamm
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für HochenergiephysikÖsterreichischen Akademie d. WissenschaftenViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations