Electromagnetic Interactions in the Deuteron

  • B. Mosconi
  • P. Ricci
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 5)


The d(γ,N)N reaction and the d(e, e’ N)N reaction are studied in the standard nuclear theory with special emphasis on the role of nucleonic and pionic relativistic corrections (RC). It is shown that the data on photodisintegration cross section definitely require the inclusion of such RC and the use of the pseudovector πN coupling theory. We also present predictions for the longitudinal-transverse structure functions of electrodisintegration at the quasi elastic peak which show remarkable RC variations in forward and backward directions.


Form Factor Differential Cross Section Standard Theory Relativistic Correc Coupling Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    M. Bernheim, A. Bussiére, J. Mougey, D. Royer, D. Tarnowski, S. Turck-Chieze, S. Frullani, G.P. Capitani, E. De Sanctis and E. Jans, Nucl. Phys. A365, 349 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Turck-Chieze, P. Barreau, M. Bernheim, P. Bradu, Z.E. Meziani, J. Morgenstern, A. Bussiére, G.P. Capitani, E. De Sanctis, S. Frullani, F. Garibaldi and J. Mougey, Phys. Lett. 142B, 145 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. Tamae, H. Ka.wahara, A. Tanaka, K. Namai, M. Sugawara, Y. Iiawazoe, H. Tsubota and H. Miyase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2919 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. van der Schaar, H. Arenhövel, Th. S. Bauer, H.P. Blok, H. J. Bulten, M. Daman, R. Ent, E. Hummel, E.Jans,G.J.Kramer, J.B.J.M. Lanen, L. Lapikâs, J.H. Mitchell, G. van der Steenhoven, J.A. Tjon, P.K.A. de Witt Huberts and A. Zondervan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2855 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D.O. Riska and G.E. Brown, Phys. Lett. 38B, 193 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Hockert, D.O. Riska, M. Gari and A. Huffman, Nucl. Phys. A217, 14 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. O. Meyer, J.R. Hall, M. Hugi, H.J. Karwowski, R.E. Pollock and P. Schwandt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1759 (1984); Phys. Rev. C31, 309 (1985)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. De Sanctis, M. Anghinolfi, G.P. Capitani, P. Corvisiero, P. Di Giacomo, C. Guaraldo, V. Lucherini, E. Polli, A.R. R.eolon, G. Ricco, M. Sanzone and A. Zucchiatti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1639 (1985); Phys. Rev. C34, 413 (1986)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.J. Hughes, A. Zieger, H. Wäffer and B. Ziegler, Nucl. Phys. A267, 329 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Cambi, B. Mosconi and P. Ricci, Proc. Workshop on Perspectives in Nuclear Physics at Intermediate Energies, Trieste, 1983, ed. S.Boffi, C. Ciofi degli Atti and M.M. Giannini (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984) pag.139Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Cambi, B. Mosconi and P. Ricci, a) Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 462 (1982);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. b) J. Phys. G10, L11 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [12]
    a) W. Fabian and H. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A314, 253 (1979);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. b) H. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A384, 257 (1982);ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. c) H. Arenhöv’el, W. Leideman and E. L. Tomusiak, Z. Phys. A331, 123 (1988);Google Scholar
  16. Erratum, Z. Phys. A334, 363 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. [13]
    B. Mosconi and P. Ricci, Nucl. Phys. A517 (1990) 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [14]
    R. A. Krajcik and L. L. Foldy, Phys. Rev. D10, 1777 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [15]
    J. L. Friar, Ann. Phys.(NY) 104, 380 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [16]
    H. Hyuga and M. Gari, Nucl. Phys. A274, 333 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [17]
    W. Jaus and W. S. Woolcock, Helv. Phys. Acta 57, 644 (1984)Google Scholar
  22. [18]
    M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J.M. Richard, R. Vin Mau, J. Côté, J. Pirés and R. De Tourreil, Phys. Rev. C21, 861 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [19]
    J. L. Friar, Phys. Rev. C12, 696 (1975)Google Scholar
  24. [20]
    J. Adam Jr. and E. Truhlik, Czech.J. Phys. B33, 558 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [21]
    H.W.L. Naus and J.H. Koch, Phys. Rev. C36 (1987) 2459Google Scholar
  26. [22]
    P.C. Tiemeijer and J.A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C342 (1990) 599Google Scholar
  27. [23]
    J. Adam Jr., E. Truhlik and D. Adamova, Nucl. Phys. A492, 556 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [24]
    S.K. Singh, W. Leidemann and H. Arenhövel, Z. Phys. A331, 509 (1988)ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [25]
    J.F.Gilot, A. Bol, P. Leleux, P. Lipnik and P. Macq, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 304 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [26]
    G. Höhler, E. Pietarinen, I. Sabba-Stefanescu, E. Borkowski, G.G. Simon, V.H. Walther and R.D. Wending, Nucl. Phys. B114, 505 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [27]
    G. van der Steenhoven, contribution to this SymposiumGoogle Scholar
  32. [28]
    M. van der Schaar,Ph.D. Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1991 (unpublished)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Mosconi
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Ricci
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità di FirenzeFirenzeItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareSezione di FirenzeFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations