Advertisement

Pontecorvo Reactions of Antiproton Annihilation in Deuterium with Heavy Mesons

  • L. A. Kondratyuk
  • M. G. Sapozhnikov
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 5)

Abstract

Rare annihilation reactions for stopped antiprotons in deuterium pd → M N, where M stands for ρ,ω,η or other heavy mesons, are considered using the two-step model described by a triangle diagram. It was found that the probabilities of these processes are comparable with those for pd → π p.

Keywords

Form Factor Heavy Meson Triangle Diagram Deuteron Wave Function Antiproton Annihilation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pontecorvo B.M., ZhETP, 30, 947 (1956).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bizzarri R. et al., Lett.Nuov.Cim., 2, 431, (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith G.A., Proc. The Elementary Structure of Matter Workshop, Les Houches, 1987, p. 219.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riedelberger J. et al., Phys. Rev., C40, 2717 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guaraldo C., Conf. on Intersections between Particle and Nuclear Physics, Tucson, (24–29 May), 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peters K., Conf. NAN-91, Moscow, (8–11 July), 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kondratyuk L.A., Sapozhnikov M.G., Phys.Lett., B220, 333, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oset E.,Hernandez E., Nucl.Phys, A494, 533, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guaraldo C., Kondratyuk L., Phys.Lett, B256, 6, (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cugnon J.,Vandermeulen J., Phys.Rev., C39, 181, (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaidalov A.B., Yad.Fiz., 53, 1410, (1991).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kondratyuk L.A.,Lev F.M.,Shevchenko L.V., Yad.Fiz., 29, 1081, (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lacombe M. et al., Phys.Lett., B 101, 139, (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dumbrais O. et al., Nucl.Phys., B 216, 277, (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Armenteros R. et al., CERN preprint, CERN/PSCC/86–4, Geneva,1986; Sapozhnikov M.G., OBELIX report, OX/DU-01–90, Geneva,1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bizzarri R. et al., Nuov.Cim., 22A, 225, (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foster M. et al., Nucl.Phys., B6, 107, (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Speth J., Workshop on Perspectives in Nuclear Physics at Intermediate Energies, ( 6–10 May ), 1991, Trieste.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. A. Kondratyuk
    • 2
  • M. G. Sapozhnikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Nuclear Problems,DubnaJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMoscowUSSR
  2. 2.Institute for Theoretical and Experimental PhysicsMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations