Comparison of Two- and Three-Nucleon Isoscalar Charge form Factors

  • H. Henning
  • J. AdamJr.
  • P. U. Sauer
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 5)


Isoscalar charge form factors of elastic electron scattering on two- and three-nucleon systems are calculated using exchange current operators derived from the extended S-matrix method. It is found that Paris and Bonn force models do not allow a simultaneous description of the corresponding observables for the deuteron and three-nucleon system.


Form Factor Partial Wave Force Model Pair Density Nucleonic Form Factor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    U. Amaldi, in: Few particle problems in the nuclear interaction, eds. I. Slaus et al., Los Angeles (1972) ( North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973 ) 839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W. M. Kloet, J. A. Tjon, Phys. Lett. 49B, 419 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. L. Friar, B. F. Gibson, G. L. Payne and C. R. Chen, Phys.Rev C34, 1463 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Adam, Jr. H. Göller and H. Arenhóvel, Contribution to this ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Adam, Jr. H. Göller and H. Arenhövel, Mainz preprintGoogle Scholar
  6. [5]
    B. Mosconi and P. Ricci, Few-Body Systems 6, 63 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [6]
    M. Gari and H. Hyuga, Nucl.Phys. A264, 409 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [7]
    J. Martino, Few-Body Systems, Supp1. 2, 90 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [8]
    J. Adam, Jr., E. Truhlik and D. Adamova, Nucl.Phys. A492, 556 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [9]
    R. Schiavilla, V. R. Pandharipande and D. O. Riska, Phys.Rev C41, 309 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [10]
    H. Henning, J. Adam, Jr. and P. U. Sauer, Hannover preprintGoogle Scholar
  12. [11]
    Ch. Hajduk, P. U. Sauer and W. Strueve, Nucl.Phys. A405, 581 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [12]
    H. Henning, P. U. Sauer and W. Theis, Nucl.Phys., in printGoogle Scholar
  14. [13]
    M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J. M. Richard. R. Vinh Mau, J. Cote, P.Pires and R. de Tourreil, Phys.Rev C21, 861 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [14]
    R. Machleidt, K. Holinde and Ch. Elster, Phys.Reports 149c, 1 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [15]
    W. Strueve, Ch. Hajduk, P. U. Sauer and W. Theis, Nucl.Phys. A465, 651 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [16a]
    M. Gari and W. Krümpelmann, Phys.Lett 141B, 95 (1984)Google Scholar
  18. M. Gari, International Conference on Unified Concepts in Many-Body Problems, Stony Brook (1986)Google Scholar
  19. [16b]
    G. G. Simon, Ch. Schmitt, F. Borkowski and V. H. Walter, Nucl.Phys. A333, 381 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Galster, H. Klein, J. Moritz, K. H. Schmidt and D. Wegener, Nucl.Phys. B32, 221 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [16c]
    F. Iachello, A. D. Jackson and A. Lande, Phys.Lett. 43B, 191 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [17]
    I. The et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 67, 173 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [18]
    H. Henning, Ph.D. thesis, Universitât HannoverGoogle Scholar
  24. H. Henning, J. Adam, Jr. and P. U. Sauer, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  25. [19]
    J. E. Elias et al., Phys.Rev. 177, 2075 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. S. K. Platchkov et al., Nucl.Phys. A510, 740 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Henning
    • 1
  • J. AdamJr.
    • 2
  • P. U. Sauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität HannoverHannover 1Germany
  2. 2.Institute of Nuclear PhysicsRez n. PragueCSFR

Personalised recommendations