Advertisement

Comparison of Two- and Three-Nucleon Isoscalar Charge form Factors

  • H. Henning
  • J. AdamJr.
  • P. U. Sauer
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 5)

Abstract

Isoscalar charge form factors of elastic electron scattering on two- and three-nucleon systems are calculated using exchange current operators derived from the extended S-matrix method. It is found that Paris and Bonn force models do not allow a simultaneous description of the corresponding observables for the deuteron and three-nucleon system.

Keywords

Form Factor Partial Wave Force Model Pair Density Nucleonic Form Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    U. Amaldi, in: Few particle problems in the nuclear interaction, eds. I. Slaus et al., Los Angeles (1972) ( North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973 ) 839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W. M. Kloet, J. A. Tjon, Phys. Lett. 49B, 419 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. L. Friar, B. F. Gibson, G. L. Payne and C. R. Chen, Phys.Rev C34, 1463 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Adam, Jr. H. Göller and H. Arenhóvel, Contribution to this ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Adam, Jr. H. Göller and H. Arenhövel, Mainz preprintGoogle Scholar
  6. [5]
    B. Mosconi and P. Ricci, Few-Body Systems 6, 63 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [6]
    M. Gari and H. Hyuga, Nucl.Phys. A264, 409 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [7]
    J. Martino, Few-Body Systems, Supp1. 2, 90 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [8]
    J. Adam, Jr., E. Truhlik and D. Adamova, Nucl.Phys. A492, 556 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [9]
    R. Schiavilla, V. R. Pandharipande and D. O. Riska, Phys.Rev C41, 309 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [10]
    H. Henning, J. Adam, Jr. and P. U. Sauer, Hannover preprintGoogle Scholar
  12. [11]
    Ch. Hajduk, P. U. Sauer and W. Strueve, Nucl.Phys. A405, 581 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [12]
    H. Henning, P. U. Sauer and W. Theis, Nucl.Phys., in printGoogle Scholar
  14. [13]
    M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J. M. Richard. R. Vinh Mau, J. Cote, P.Pires and R. de Tourreil, Phys.Rev C21, 861 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [14]
    R. Machleidt, K. Holinde and Ch. Elster, Phys.Reports 149c, 1 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [15]
    W. Strueve, Ch. Hajduk, P. U. Sauer and W. Theis, Nucl.Phys. A465, 651 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [16a]
    M. Gari and W. Krümpelmann, Phys.Lett 141B, 95 (1984)Google Scholar
  18. M. Gari, International Conference on Unified Concepts in Many-Body Problems, Stony Brook (1986)Google Scholar
  19. [16b]
    G. G. Simon, Ch. Schmitt, F. Borkowski and V. H. Walter, Nucl.Phys. A333, 381 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Galster, H. Klein, J. Moritz, K. H. Schmidt and D. Wegener, Nucl.Phys. B32, 221 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [16c]
    F. Iachello, A. D. Jackson and A. Lande, Phys.Lett. 43B, 191 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [17]
    I. The et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 67, 173 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [18]
    H. Henning, Ph.D. thesis, Universitât HannoverGoogle Scholar
  24. H. Henning, J. Adam, Jr. and P. U. Sauer, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  25. [19]
    J. E. Elias et al., Phys.Rev. 177, 2075 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. S. K. Platchkov et al., Nucl.Phys. A510, 740 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Henning
    • 1
  • J. AdamJr.
    • 2
  • P. U. Sauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität HannoverHannover 1Germany
  2. 2.Institute of Nuclear PhysicsRez n. PragueCSFR

Personalised recommendations