Information Technology Adoption by Midwest United States Travelers

  • Daniel R. Fesenmaier
  • Rhonda L. Bonifield
Conference paper


The travel and tourism industry is information intensive (Poon, 1993). Tourists need, and therefore demand, information about destinations in order to select vacation places, to plan trips, and to facilitate choices about services and activities throughout the vacation experience. The nature and effectiveness of the various channels travelers use to obtain information have changed dramatically over the past few years. Destination marketing organizations (DMO’s) have in large part relied on traditional methods (i.e., television, newspaper, and magazine advertisements) to provide travel information. These methods are giving way to new communication vehicles such as the Internet (e.g., Prodigy and America On-line), the Home Buying and Travel Channels, as well as point-of-purchase televideo, kiosks and interactive computers. These forms of technology create opportunities for information exchange where the traveler can interact with the information provider as well as the supplier. Frequently, the individual who controls information (or access to information) can be expected to benefit (both in experience and financially) more than those who have no control (Poon, 1993).


Technological Forecast Magazine Advertisement Travel Industry Information Technology Adoption Travel Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bobrowski, P. & Bretschneider, S. (1994). Internal and external interorganizational relationships and their impact on the adoption of new technology: An exploratory study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, A. (1992). Incorporating consumer resistance to innovation in a new product diffusion model: A new model and a simulation comparison with existing models. Unpublished thesis, University of Illinois: Urbana.Google Scholar
  3. Ghosh, S., McGuckin, J.T. & Kumbhakar, S.C. (1994). Technical efficiency, risk attitude, and adoption of new technology: The case of the U.S. Dairy industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hagedorn, J. (1989). The dynamic analsis of innovation and diffusion: A study in process control. New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Herbig, P.A. & Palumbo, F. (1994). The effect of culture on the adoption process: A comparison of Japanese and American behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46, 71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Krovi, R. (1993). Identifying the causes of resistance to IS implementation: A change theory perspctive. Information & Management, 25, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mathieson, K. (1993). Reducing bias in users evaluations of information systems. Information & Management, 25, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Poon, A. (1993). Tourism, technology and competitive strategies. Trowbridge, UK: Redwood Books.Google Scholar
  9. Rogers, E.M. (1983). The Diffusion of Innovations ( 3rd edition ). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sheth, J.N. (1979). Psychology of innovation resistance: The less developed concept (LDC) in diffusion research. Faculty working papers No. 622. University of Illinois: Urbana.Google Scholar
  11. Singh, S.K. (1993). Using information technology effectively: Organizational preparedness models. Information & Management, 24, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel R. Fesenmaier
    • 1
  • Rhonda L. Bonifield
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IllinoisUSA

Personalised recommendations