Advertisement

NN P-Wave Effects in Polarized Deuteron Capture on Hydrogen: An Exact Faddeev Calculation

  • A. C. Fonseca
  • D. R. Lehman
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 6)

Abstract

An exact Faddeev calculation of 1H(\(\vec{d}\), γ)3He has been carried out including NN P-wave interactions. It is found that the contributions from the NN P-wave interactions to the 3He D-state have no more than a 3% effect on the tensor analyzing powers (TAP) at E d = 19.6 MeV. However, the NN P-wave interactions in the initial-state continuum have a large effect (20% to 60% for 19.6 ≤ E d ≤ 95 MeV) on the magnitude of the TAP.

Keywords

Photonuclear Reaction Deuteron Energy Tensor Analyze Power Electromagnetic Operator Triton Binding Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M.C. Vetterli, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.; 24, 1129 (1985).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Jourdan, et al., Nucl Phys. A453,220(1986); Phys. Lett. 162B, 269 (1985).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W.K. Pitts, et al., Phys. Rev. C2, 1 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    W.K. Pitts, private communication; H.R. Weller, private communication.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D.R. Lehman, Theoretical Status of Three-Nucleon Photonuclear Reactions, in: Lecture Notes in Physics 260, B.L. Berman and B.F. Gibson (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986) p. 287; Nucl. Phys. A463,117c(1987).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H.R. Weller and D.R. Lehman, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 38,563(1988); D.R. Lehman, Colloque de Physique 51,C6–47(1990).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A.M. Eiró and F.D. Santos, Jour. of Phys. G 12, 1139 (1990).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Arriaga and F.D. Santos, Phys. Rev. C29, 1945 (1984).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A.C. Phillips, Nucl. Phys. A107, 209 (1968).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    F.D. Correll, et al., Phys. Rev. C2, 960 (1981).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D.J. Ernst, C.M. Shakin, and R.M. Thaler, Phys. Rev. C1,46(1973); ibid, C2, 1780 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    I.M. Barbour and J.A. Hendry, Phys. Lett. 38B, 151 (1972).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    B.F. Gibson, Calculation of Electromagnetic Observables in Few-Body Systems, in: Lecture Notes in Physics 273, eds. L.S. Ferreira, A.C. Fonseca, and L. Streit ( Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987 ) p. 548.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    B.F. Gibson and D.R. Lehman, Phys. Rev. C111,29(1975); ibid, C11, 477 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J.A. Hendry and A.C. Phillips, Nucl. Phys. A211, 533 (1973).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Ticcioni, et al., Phys. Lett. 443, 369 (1973).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    S.E. King, et al., Phys. Rev. CQ,21(1984).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    A.C. Fonseca and D.R. Lehman, Phys. Lett., in press (1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Fonseca
    • 1
  • D. R. Lehman
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro Fisica NuclearLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Center for Nuclear Studies Department of PhysicsThe George Washington UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations