Advertisement

Deuteron Threshold Electrodisintegration

  • Claude F. Williamson
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 6)

Abstract

Cross sections for the D(e,e′)pn reaction in the region of the breakup threshold have been measured at the MIT/Bates Linac by a multi-institutional collaboration for 10 < Q2 < 40 fm−2. These measurements extend the previous Saclay data and are in excellent agreement with them in the region of overlap. The present cross sections averaged over 3 MeV from threshold appear to be consistently smaller than recently reported data from SLAC averaged over 10 MeV. None of the measurements shows a minimum in the cross sections for Q2 < 40 fm−2. Some recent potential model calculations appear to be in fair agreement with the data, but the existing calculations based on hybrid quark models appear to be in poor agreement with the data.

Keywords

Breakup Cross Section Deuterium Target Meson Exchange Current Liquid Deuterium Present Cross Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. Z. Jankus, Phys. Rev. 102, 1586 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. R. J. Adler, Phys. Rev. 169, 1192 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Hockert, et al., Nucl. Phys. A217, 14 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. J. A. Lock and L. L. Foldy, Ann. Phys. 93, 276 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. W. Fabian and A. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A258, 461 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Sommer, Nucl. Phys. A308, 263 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Fabian and A. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A314, 253 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. L. S. Kisslinger, Phys. Lett. 111B, 307 (1982).Google Scholar
  9. W. Leidmann and H. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A393, 385 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. J. F. Mathiot, Nucl. Phys. A412, 201 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Buchmann, W. Leidmann, and H. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A443, 726 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Y. Yamauchi, R. Yamamoto, and M. Wakamatsu, Nucl. Phys. A457, 602 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. T.-S. Cheng and L. S. Kisslinger, Nucl. Phys. A457, 602 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 2.
    R. E. Rand, R. F. Frosch, C. E. Littig, and M. R. Yearian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 469 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Ganichot, D. Grosstête, and D. B. Isabelle, Nucl. Phys. A178, 545 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. G. G. Simon, et al., Nucl. Phys. A324, 277 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Bernheim, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 402 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 3.
    S. Auffret, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1362 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 4.
    W. Bertozzi, et al., Nucl. Inst.and Methods 162, 211 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 5.
    W. Bertozzi, et al., Nucl. Inst. and Methods 141, 457 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 6.
    K. S. Lee, et al., Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
  22. 7.
    R. G. Arnold, et al., Phys. Rev. C42, R1 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 8.
    R. Dymarz and F. C. Khanna, Phys. Rev. C41, 828 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 9.
    W. Leidmann, K.-M. Schmitt and H. Arenhövel, Phys. Rev. C42, R826 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 10.
    R. Schiavilla and D. O. Riska, Phys. Rev. C43, 437 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claude F. Williamson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Bates Linear Accelerator CenterMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations