The Naïve Quark Model and Beyond

Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 6)


I comment on the (lack of) connection between the Naïve Quark Model and Quantum Chromodynamics. The relation between magnetic moments of baryons and the problem of the spin of the proton is discussed in more detail; in particular it is emphasized that data on the magnetic moments and axial couplings of baryons are now much more accurate than in the past, and are less encouraging for the Naïve Quark Model than in the past.


Quark Model Chiral Symmetry Breaking Nucl Phys Axial Coupling Hadron Wave Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B160, 57 (1979).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    for recent work on the NQM see e.g. S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D34, 2809 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D32, 189 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [3]
    see e.g. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Reports 87 77 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D.B. Kaplan and A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. Let. 56 2004 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. K Choi et al, Phys. Rev. Letts. 61, 794 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Maltman, T. Goldman and G.L. Stephenson Jr., Phys. Letters B234, 158 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [4]
    see e.g. S.J. Brodsky, J. Ellis and M. Karliner, Phys. Letters B206, 309 (1988).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Bijnens, H. Sonoda and M. Wise, Phys. Letters B140, 421 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [5]
    J. Bijnens, H. Sonoda and M. Wise, Can. J. Phys. 64 1 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. G. Karl, G. Patera and S. Perantonis, Phys. Letters B172, 49 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Karl and H.J. Lipkin (to be published).Google Scholar
  13. [6]
    H. Georgi and A. Manohar, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [7]
    S. Pinsky, KG. Wilson et al: work described at the Aspen workshop on light cone physics.Google Scholar
  15. [8]
    G. Karl, Guelph preprint GWP2-PP-91–02. Earlier references includes: G. Karl, LM. Sehgal, Phys. Rev. D10, 1663 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. G. Karl, J. Bartelski and R. Rodenberg, Phys. Rev. D41, 2800 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Karl, R. Decker, M. Nowakowski and J. Stahov, Nucl. Phys. A512, 626 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. G. Karl, S.M. Gerasimov, Int. Conf. at Alushta (1987) Dubna preprint E2–88–122.Google Scholar
  19. G. Karl, G. Karl and M.D. Scadron, Proceedings of MRST Conf. (1990).Google Scholar
  20. [9]
    See for example M.C. Chu, M. Lissia and J.W. Negele, to appear in Nucl. Phys. B (1991), who discuss extensive computations of correlation functions in the 7[, p and nucleon.Google Scholar
  21. [10]
    See for example E.V. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. B328, 85 (1989) and references therein.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Karl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations