Advertisement

Evolving Information Systems: Beyond Temporal Information Systems

  • E. D. Falkenberg
  • J. L. H. Oei
  • H. A. Proper

Abstract

Nowadays, in order for an organisation to be competitive, it must be able to adapt quickly to its dynamic environment. In this paper, we discuss the need for information systems which are capable to evolve to the same extent as organisations do. Requirements of evolving organisations on their information systems are identified, followed by alternative approaches to adequate information systems development life cycles. We adopt an evolutionary approach resulting in so-called evolving information systems.

On the basis of requirements and an architecture for these evolving information systems, the distinction from traditional information systems is explained. Traditional information systems, including temporal information systems, appear to be degenerations of our evolving information systems. A conceptual framework for update in evolving information systems is derived from the requirements. An event level, a recording level and a correction level are distinguished in this framework for update.

Keywords

Information System Formation System Application Model Evolutionary Approach Meta Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T.M.A. Bemelmans. Business Information Systems and Automation. (In Dutch: Bestuurlijke informatiesystemen en automatisering). Stenfert Kroese, Leiden, 3d revised edition, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Brinkkemper and E.D. Falkenberg. Three Dichotomies in the Information System Methodology. In P. W. G. Bots, H. G. Sol, and I. G. Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, editors, Informatiesystemen in beweging (Information Systems on the move). Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P.P. Chen. The entity-relationship model: towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1):9–36, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G.B. Davis. Strategies for Information Requirements Determination. In Robert Galliers, editor, INFORMATION ANALYSIS: Selected readings, chapter 13. Addison Wesley, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E.D. Falkenberg, J.L.H. Oei, and H.A. Proper. A Conceptual Framework for Evolving Information Systems. In H.G. Sol and R.L. Crosslin, editors, Dynamic Modelling of Information Information Systems II, pages 353-375. North-Holland, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    E.D. Falkenberg, J.L.H. Oei, and H. A. Proper. A Metamodel for Update in Information Systems. Technical Report 92-05, Department of Information Systems, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E.D. Falkenberg, J.L.H. Oei, and H.A. Proper. Modelling the Evolution of Information Systems. In Preparation, Department of Information Systems, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. Gane and T. Sarson. Structured System Analysis: Tools and techniques. IST Databooks. MacDonald Douglas Corporation, St. Louis, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. J. Genrich and K. Lantenbach. System Modelling with High-Level Petri-Nets. Theoretical Computer Science, 13:109–136, 1981.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A.H.M. ter Hofstede, H.A. Proper, and Th. P. van der Weide. Data Modelling Complex Application Domains. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE’92 pages 364-377, Manchester, United Kingdom, May 1992.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.H.M. ter Hofstede and Th. P. van der Weide. Expressiveness in Data Modelling. Report 91-07, SERC, Software Engineering Research Centrum, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 1991. To be published.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Land. Adapting to Changing User Requirements. In Robert Galliers, editor, INFORMATION ANALYSIS: Selected readings, chapter 12. Addison Wesley, 1987.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Lindgreen, editor. A Framework of Information Systems Concepts. Interim Report of the IFIP WG 8. 1 Task Group FRISCO, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Lundeberg, G. Goldkuhl, and A. Nilsson. Information Systems Development-A Systematic Approach. Prentice Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. L. McClure. CASE is Software Automation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Meyer. Object-oriented software construction. Prentice Hall, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    T.W. Olle, J. Hagelstein, I.G. Macdonald, C. Roland, H.G. Sol, F.J.M. van Assche, and A.A. Verrijn-Stuart. Information System Methodologies: A Framework for Understanding. Addison Wesley, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. Rolland and C. Richard. The REMORA Methodologie for Information System Design and Management. In T.W. Olle, H.G. Sol, and A.A. Verrijn Stuart, editors, Information System Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review, pages 369-426. North-Holland/IFIP, 1982.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. Snodgrass and I. Ahn. Temporal Databases. IEEE Computer, 19 (9):35–42, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    I. Sommerville. Software Engineering. Addison Wesley, 3d edition, 1989.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    A.A. Verrijn-Stuart. Some Reflections on the Namur Conference on Information Systems Concepts. In E.D. Falkenberg and P. Lindgreen, editors, Information System Concepts: An In-depth Analysis. North-Holland/IFIP, 1989.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    J.J.V.R. Wintraecken. The NIAM Information Analysis Method: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. D. Falkenberg
    • 1
  • J. L. H. Oei
    • 1
  • H. A. Proper
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations