Advertisement

HyperIBIS — a Tool for Argumentative Problem Solving

  • Severin Isenmann
Conference paper

Abstract

Many problems in the field of politics and design cannot be solved by using straightforward algorithmic methods. These problems are characterized by the collision of different judgements and different interests. Typically those problems are solved by weighing up the different arguments and finding compromises. This is done by a discourse between the involved groups. A hypertext based system called HyperIBIS will be described that supports the structuring and documentation of discourse on such problems. The system rests upon a theoretical approach called IBIS that has been first introduced by Rittel and Kunz.

Keywords

Current Node Inflected Form Traffic Problem Instrumental Knowledge Instrumental Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M.A. Bates, An Exploratory Paradigm for Online Information Retrieval, in: B. C. Brookes (ed.), Intelligent Information Systems for the Information Society, pp. 91-99, Elsevier, 1986Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K.C. Burgess-Yakemovic and E.J. Conklin, Report on a Development Project Use of an Issue-Based Information System, Proceedings of the Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, ACM, 1990Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Conklin, Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey, IEEE Computer 20(9), pp. 17–41, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Conklin and M.L. Begeman, gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 6(4), pp. 303–331, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Fischer and R. McCall, JANUS: Integrating Hypertext with a Knowledge-based Design Environment, Proceedings of the Hypertext’ 89, New York, ACM, pp. 105–117, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    F. Flores, M. Graves, B. Hartfield and T. Winograd, Computer Systems and the Design of Organizational Interaction, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 6(2), pp. 153–172, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Kuhlen, Hypertext — ein nichtlineares Medium zur Darstellung von Wissen und Erarbeitung von Information, Springer-Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. Kunz, H.W.J. Rittel, Issues as Elements of Information Systems, Working Paper No. 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1970Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. MacLean, R.M. Young and Th. P. Moran, Design Rationale: The Argument Behind the Artifact, Proceedings of the CHI’ 89, New York, ACM, pp. 247–252, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H.W.J. Rittel, M. Webber, Dilemmas in a general Theory of Planning, in: Policy Sciences 4, pp. 155–169, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J.R. Searle, Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, 1979Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    N.A. Streitz, J. Hannemann, M. Thüring, From Ideas and Arguments to Hyperdocuments: Travelling through Activity Spaces, Proceedings of the Hypertext’ 89, New York, ACM, pp. 343-364, 1989Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, 1958Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. Winograd, F. Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Ablex, Norwood, 1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Severin Isenmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Forschungsinstitut für anwendungsorientierte Wissensverarbeitung (FAW) UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations