Skip to main content

Improving Automated Litigation Support by Supplementing Rule-Based Reasoning with Case-Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications

Abstract

We are currently developing concepts and software tools designed to aid legal practitioners in the process of statutory interpretation: the process of determining the meaning of a statute or regulation and applying it to a particular set of facts. This is being attempted through the integration of database and expert system technologies. Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) is being used to model legal precedents while Rule-Based Reasoning (RBR) modules are being used to model the legislation and other types of causal knowledge. It is hoped to generalise these findings and to develop a formal methodology for integrating case-based databases with rule-based expert systems in the legal domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashley, K. D. (1988), “Arguing by Analogy in Law: A Case Based Model”, Analogical Reasoning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 205-224.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashley, K.D., and Rissland, E.L. (1988), “A Case-Based Approach to Modelling Expertise”, in IEEE Expert. Fall, pp 70-77.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bain, W.M. (1986), “Case Based Reasoning: A Computer Model of Subjective Assessment”, PhD thesis. Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barletta, R. (1991), “An Introduction to Case-Based Reasoning”, AI Expert. August 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gardner, A. (1987) “An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning”, Bradford/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golding, A.R., Rosenbloom P.S. (1991) “Improving Rule-Based systems through Case-Based Reasoning”, Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intellegence (AAAI-91), July 1991, pp22-27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hammond, D. J. (1989) “Case Based Planning: Viewing Planning as a Memory Task. Boston: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kolodner, J. (1988), “Proceedings of a Workshop on Case Based Reasoning”, May 1988, Clearwater Beach, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolodner, J. (1991), “Improving Human Decision Making Through Case-Based Decision Aiding”. AI Magazine, Summer 1991, pp 52-67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koton, P. (1988), “Reasoning about evidence in causal explanation”, Proceedings of AAAI-88, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kowalski, A. (1991) “Case-based Reasoning and the Deep Structure Approach to Knowledge Representation”, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Oxford, June 25–28 1991, ACM Press, pp 21-30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riesbeck, C. K. and Schank, R. C. (1989) “Inside Case Based Reasoning”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rissland, E. L., Skalak, D. B. (199)1 “CABARET: Rule Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture” to appear International Journal of Man Machine Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, J.C., Deedman, C., (1987) “The Application of Expert Systems Technology to Case-Based Law”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1987, ACM Press, pp 84-93.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sycara, E. P., (1987), “Resolving Adversarial Conflicts: An Approach to Integrating Case Based and Analytic Methods”, Technical Report GIT-ICS-87/26, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Information and Computer Science, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vossos, G., Dillon, T., Zeleznikow, J. and Taylor, G. (1991a), “The Use of Object Oriented Principles to Develop Intelligent Legal Reasoning Systems”, Australian Computer Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, February 1991, pp 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vossos, G., Zeleznikow, J., Dillon, T. and Vossos, V. (1991b), “An Example of Integrating Legal Case Based Reasoning with Object Oriented Rule-Based Systems — IKBALS II”, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Oxford, June 25–28 1991, ACM Press, pp 91-101.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walker, R. F., Oskamp, A., Schrickx, J. A., Opdorp, G. J., Berg, P. H. van den (1991), “PROLEXS: Creating Law and Order in a Hetorogeneous Domain”, to appear International Journal of Man Machine Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vossos, G., Zeleznikow, J. (1992). Improving Automated Litigation Support by Supplementing Rule-Based Reasoning with Case-Based Reasoning. In: Tjoa, A., Ramos, I. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7557-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7557-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82400-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7557-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics