Advertisement

Building Adaptive Applications using Active Mediators

  • Tore Risch
  • Gio Wiederhold
Conference paper

Abstract

We extend current DBMS technology to support applications in dynamic and heterogenous environments. Our approach raises the level of software support available from DBMSs to include an intermediate layer of software to mediate between databases and their use by applications and users. In particular we are demonstrating active mediators, where the application instructs a mediator to actively monitor databases for change in information that the application depends on. We identify how mediators can support applications that are sensitive to change.

A prototype platform for these classes of mediators has been developed. As a uniform interface language throughout the system we use OSQL, a declarative object-oriented query language. OSQL statements are optimized using concepts extracted from Datalog and relational database research.

Keywords

Main Memory Query Language Task Model Tracking Procedure Persistent Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Ahmed, P. Desmedt, W. Kent, A. Rafii, W. Litwin, M. Shan: The Pegasus project: Information Management in a Heterogeneous Database Environment, IEEE COMP CON, March 1991.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Barsalou, G. Wiederhold: Complex objects for relational databases, Computer-Aided Design, 22 (8), Oct. 1990, pp. 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Beech: A Foundation for Evolution from Relational to Object Databases, Advances in Database Technology–EDBT ‘88, Lecture Notes in Comp. Sc., Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 251–270.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Brownston, R. Farell, E. Kant, N. Martin: Programming Expert Systems in OPS5, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1985.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    U. Dayal, M. Hsu, R. Ladin: Organizing Long-Running Activities with Trigger and Transactions, Proc. SIG-MOD, May 23–25, Atlantic City, 1990, pp. 204–214.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Fishman et ah Overview of the Iris DBMS, in W.Kim, F.H.Lochovsky (ed.): Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases, and Applications, ACM press, Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp., 1989.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Krishnamurthy, S. Zaniolo: Optimization in a Logic Based Language for Knowledge and Data Intensive Applications, Advances in Database Technology–EDBT ‘88, Lecture Notes in Comp. Sc., Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Lucas, T. Risch: Representation of Factual Information by Equations and their Evaluation, Proc. Intl. Conf. on Software Eng., Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 13–16, IEEE, New York, 1982, pp. 153–167Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Lyngbaek and the OODB Team at CSY: OSQL: A Language for Object Databases, Technical report, HP Labs, HPL-DTD-91–4, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. deMichiel: Performing Operations over Mismatched Domains, Proc. of IEEE Data Eng. 5, Los Angeles, Feb. 1989.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Nii: The Blackboard Model for Problem Solving, AI Magazine, Vol. 7, No. 2, Spring 1986, pp. 38–53.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    T. Risch, R. Reboh, P. Hart, R. Duda: A Functional Approach to Integrating Database and Expert Systems, Communications of the ACM 31, 12 (Dec. 1988), pp. 1424–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Risch: Monitoring Database Objects, Proc. VLDB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. Risch: Tuning the Reactivity of Database Monitors,Technical Report, HP Labs, HPL-90–17, 1990 (also part of [26]).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Risch: The Translation of Object-Oriented Queries to Optimized Datalog Programs, Technical Report, HP Labs, HPL-DTD-91–9, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    E. H. Shortcliffe: Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN, American Elsevier, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. Snodgrass, I.Ahn: Temporal Databases, IEEE Computer, Vol. 19, No. 9, Sept. 1986, pp. 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    G.L. Steele Jr., G.J. Sussman: CONSTRAINTS, in APL79 Conf. Proc., ( Rochester, USA ), pp. 208–225.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Stonebraker: The design of POSTGRES, Proc. SIG-MOD, 1986, pp. 340–355.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    J.D. Ullman: Principles of Database and Knowledge-Base Systems, Volume I and II, Comp. Sc. Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. Washington, B. Hayes-Roth: Input Data Management in Real-Time AI Systems, 11th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 1989, pp. 250–255.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    G. Wiederhold: Views, objects, and databases, IEEE Computer, 19 (12), 1986, pp. 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    G. Wiederhold, X.Qian: Modeling Asynchrony in Distributed Databases, 3rd Intl. Conf. on Data Eng., Los Angeles, CA, Feb. 3–5, 1987, pp. 246–250.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    G. Wiederhold, S.Jajodia, W.Litwin: Dealing with Granularity of Time in Temporal Databases, Nordic Conf. on Adv. Inf. Syst. Eng., Springer, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    G. Wiederhold, P.Rathmann, T.Barsalou, B.S.Lee, D.Quass: Partitioning and Composing Knowledge, Inf. Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1990, pp. 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    G. Wiederhold, T. Risch, P. Rathmann, L.DeMichiel, S.Chaudhury, B.S.Lee, K.H.Law, T.Barsalou, D.Quass: A Mediator Architecture for Abstract Data Access, Stanford Comp. Sc. Dept., STAN-CS-90–1301, 1990.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    M. Winslett, K. Hall, D. Knapp, G. Wiederhold: Use of Change Coordination in an Information-rich Design Environment, IEEE Design Automation Conf., Las Vegas, June 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tore Risch
    • 1
  • Gio Wiederhold
    • 2
  1. 1.Hewlett-Packard LaboratoriesPalo AltoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations