Knowledge Base Support for Hypermedia Co-Authoring

  • Stefan Eherer
  • Matthias Jarke
Conference paper


Hypertext systems can be characterized by the interactions they provide. Systems like Document Examiner [26] and Hyperties [19] are intended to present hypertexts developed by a small group of experts, whereas the user shall only read them. On the other hand, systems like Augment [7], Guide [10], Intermedia [9], KMS [1], Neptune [4], NoteCards [12], and WE [20] provide facilities to edit hypertext documents, i.e. the users themselves are able to create nodes and links. KMS and NoteCards have been extended by components which support groups of users working with the system. However, none of them tries to control the usage of the system by integrating a knowledge base component.


Precedence Relation Structure Object Document Design Hierarchical Relation Computer Support Cooperative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    R. M. Akscyn, D. L. McCracken, E. A. Yoder [ 1988 ]: KMS: A distributed Hypermedia System for Managing Knowledge in Organizations. In Communications of the ACM, Vol. 31, 7 (July 1988), pp. 820–835.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. P. Anderson [1970]: A Model of Group Decision. In R. S. Cathcart, L. A. Samovar (Eds): Small Group Communication. A Reader. Dubuque, Iowa: Brown, 1970, pp. 103–115.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. Catlin, P. Bush, N. Yankelovich [ 1989 ]: InterNote: Extending a Hypermedia Framework to Support Annotative Collaboration. In Hypertext `89 Proceedings, Nov. 5th-8th 1989, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 365–378.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. Delisle, M. Schwartz [ 1986 ]: Neptune: A Hypertext System for CAD Applications. In ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 6, 1 (January 1988), pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    ECMA [ 1985 ]: European Computer Manufacturers Association TC-29. Office Document Arcitecture. Standard ECMA-101, Geneve, Sept. 1985.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Eherer, K. Pohl [ 1991 ]: Introducing Abstraction into Hypermedia Documents. Submitted to Hypertext ‘81.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. C. Englebart [ 1984 ]: Authorship Provisions in Augment. COMP-CON 84: 28th IEEE Computer Society International Conference. Intellectual Leverage: The driving Technologies. Feb. 27th-Mar. 1st 1984, San Francisco, CA, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 465–472.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. S. Fish, R. E. Kraut, M. D. P. Leland, M. Cohen [ 1988 ]: Quilt–A Collaborative Tool for Cooperative Writing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Office Information Systems. Mar. 23rd-25th 1988, Palo Alto, California, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. N. Garret, K. E. Smith, N. Meyrowitz [ 1986 ]: Intermedia: Issues, strategies, and tactics in the design of a hypermedia system. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Dec. 3rd-5th 1986, Austin, Texas, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Guide Users Manual. Owl International, Bellevue, Wash., 1986.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    U. Hahn, M. Jacke, S. Eherer, K. Kreplin [ 1990 ]: CoAUTHOR - A Hypermedia Group Authoring Environment. In: J. Bowers, S. Benford (Eds.): Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design. Amsterdam, North Holland, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Halasz [ 1988 ]: Reflections on NoteCards: Seven Issues for the next Generation of Hypertext Systems. In Communications of the ACM, Vol. 31, 7 (Juli 1988), pp. 836–852.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. Halasz, M. Schwartz [ 1990 ]: The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. In Proceedings of the Hypertext Standardization Workshop, Jan. 16th-18th 1990, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 500–178, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Janke (Ed.) [1991]: ConceptBase V3.0 User Manual. University of Passau (Report MW-9106).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    W. C. Mann, J. A. Moore [1981]: Computer Generation of Multiparagraph English Text. American Journal of Computational Linguistics Vol. 7 (1981), 1, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. R. McKeown [1985]: Discourse Strategies for Generating Natural-Language Text. Artificial Intelligence Vol. 27 (1985), 1, pp. 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. Mylopoulos, A. Borgida, M. Jerke, M. Koubarakis [1990]: Telos - a Language for Representing Knowledge about Information Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 8, 4 (October 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    T. Rose, M. Jake, M. Gocek, C. Mattzahn, H. W. Nissen [1991]: A Decision-Based Configuration Process Environment. Software Engineering Journal, Vol. 6, 1 (September 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    B. Shneiderman [1987]: User interface design for the Hyperties electronic enceclopedia. In Proceedings of the Hypertext ‘87 Workshop,University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. B. Smith, S. F. Weiss, G.J. Bolter, M. Lansman, D. V. Bea [ 1986 ]: WE: A writing environment for professionals. Tech. Rep. 86–025. Dept. of Computer Science. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Aug. 1986.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. B. Smith, M. Lansmann [ 1988 ]: A cognitive basis for a computer writing environment. Tech. Rep. Dept. of Computer Science. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1988.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    C. Thanos (ed.) [1989]: Multimedia Document Filing: The MULTOS Approach. North-Holland, 1989.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. H. Trigg, L. Suchman, F. Halasz [ 1986 ]: Supporting Collaboration in NoteCards. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Dec. 3rd-5th 1986, Austin, Texas, pp. 153–162.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    R. H. Trigg [ 1988 ]: Guided Tours and Tabletops–Tools for Communicating in a Hypertext Environment. In ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 6 ( 1988 ), 4, pp. 398–414.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. van de Ven, A. L. Delbecq [1971]: Nominal versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 14 (1971), 2, pp. 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. Walker [1987]: Document Examiner. Delivery interface to hypertext documents. In Proceedings of Hypertext ‘87 Workshop,University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Eherer
    • 1
  • Matthias Jarke
    • 2
  1. 1.University of PassauPassauGermany
  2. 2.Informatik VRWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations