An Intelligent Interface to Legal Data Bases Combining Logic Programming and Hypertext
We propose an architecture for building expert systems in which the main subsystems are distinct but communicating programs: a Prolog inference engine, a multimedia interface tool and a data base management system. We have used this architecture for constructing a legal expert system for labour law.
We propose a novel approach for capturing vague concepts. The vagueness is not represented in the sense that its extent is quantified but instead rules are given for evaluating the concept in a given situation. The method is analogous to legal practice; lawyers develop methods for judging whether vague concepts apply to fact situations. These methods are used for identifying the relevant sub-questions and legal text documents for analyzing the case in issue. Our system reflects this and other aspects of a lawyer’s practical work.
KeywordsExpert System Logic Programming Text Document Legal Reasoning Computer Reasoning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.B. Atkinson, Hypercard (Cupertino, CA.: Apple Comp. Inc., 1987 ).Google Scholar
- 2.J. Barklund, A. Hamfelt, S.-A. Tärnlund, “A Legal Reasoning Assistant,” Council of Europe, report by Swedish delegation: 9th Symp. on Legal Data Processing in Europe, (Bonn 1989 ).Google Scholar
- 3.T. Bench-Capon, M. Sergot, “Toward a Rule-Based Representation of Open Texture in Law,” Computer Power and Legal Language (ed. C. Walter) (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1988 ), 39–60.Google Scholar
- 4.V. Bush “As we may think,” Atlantic Monthly (July 1945): 101–8.Google Scholar
- 5.A. Colmerauer, H. Kanoui, M. van Caneghem, R. Pasero, P. Roussel, Un Système de Communication Homme-Machine en Francais (Marseille: Univ. Aix-Marseille I I, 1973 ).Google Scholar
- 6.D.C. Engelbart, W.K. English, “A research center for augmenting human intellect,” AFIPS Conf. Proc. 33 ( Montvale, N.J.: AFIPS Press, 1968 ).Google Scholar
- 7.A. Hamfelt, The Multilevel Structure of Legal Knowledge and its Representation, Uppsala Theses in Computing Science 8/90 ( Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1990 ).Google Scholar
- 8.A. Hamfelt, J. Barklund, “Meta Levels in Legal Knowledge and their Runnable Representation in Logic,” Proc. 3rd Intl. Congress-Logica, In format-lea, Diritto -Expert Systems in Law, (1989), 557–76.Google Scholar
- 9.A. Hamfelt, J. Barklund, “Metaprogramming for Representation of Legal Principles,” Proc. Meta90 Workshop, (1990), 105–22.Google Scholar
- 10.A. Hamfelt, P. Wahlgren, “Datorstödda beslutArtificiell Intelligens och juridik” AFIPS Conf. Proc. 33 (Stockholm, Univ. of Stockholm, 1988).Google Scholar
- 11.H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961 ).Google Scholar
- 12.P. J. Hayes, “Some Problems and Non-Problems in Representation Theory,” Proc. AISB Summer Conf., (1974), 63–79.Google Scholar
- 13.N. K. Sundby, Om normer, ( Oslo-Bergen-Tromso: Universitetsforlaget, 1974 ).Google Scholar
- 14.J. Wünsche, Integrating Prolog and a Multimedia. Environment, MSc thesis ( Uppsala: Uppsala university, 1990 ).Google Scholar