Advertisement

Two Level Hypermedia

An Improved Architecture for Hypertext
  • P. D. Bruza
  • Th. P. van der Weide

Abstract

In this article we present the Two Level Hypermedia architecture. Both levels of this architecture are detailed in the framework of a conceptual model of hypermedia. A central aspect of this model is the notion of a view. The concept of a hyperindex is introduced, which is a novel approach to organizing indexing information relevant for hypermedia. In conjunction with the hyperindex, the notion of Query by Navigation (QBN) is introduced.

Keywords

Parse Tree Index Expression Level Architecture Document Type Definition Associative Link 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P.D. Bruza. Hyperindices: A Novel Aid for Searching in Hypermedia. Technical Report 90–03. Afdeling Informatiesystemen, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1990. Research report.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    P.D. Bruza and Th. P. van der Weide. The semantics of data flow diagrams. In Proceedings of Conference on Management of Data,1989. Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    I.R Campbell-Grant and P.J. Robinson. An Introduction to ISO DIS 8613–Office Document Architecture–and its Application to Computer Graphics. Comput and Graphics, 11 (4): 325–341, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Conklin. Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey. IEEE Computer, 20 (9): 17–41, September 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.J.van Griethuysen (ed.). Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptuel Schema and the Information Base. 1982. ISO Report, Publ. nr. ISO/TC97/SC5–N695.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. Garg. Abstraction mechanisms in hypertext. Communications ACM, 31 (7): 863–870, July 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    ISO8879. Information Processing – Text and Office Systems – Standard General Markup Language (SGML), 1986–10–15.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Gecsei R. Godin and C. Pichet. Design of a Browsing Interface for Information Retrieval. In N.J. Belkin and C.J. van Rijsbergen, editors, Proceedings of the Twelfth ACMSIGIR Conference, pages 32–37, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Salton. Automatic Text Processing: the Translation, Analysis and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Schouten. SGML*CASE: The Storage of Documents in Databases. Technical Report 03–11, TFDL/ECIT, PO 356, 6700 Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1989. Internal Report.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    B. Shneiderman and G. Kearsley. Hypertext Hands-Onl Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Teufel and S. Schmidt. Full text retrieval based on syntactic similarities. Information Systems, 13 (1): 6570, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. Toropa. A Data Model for Flexible Hypertext Database Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 7 (1): 85–100, January 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Bruza
    • 1
  • Th. P. van der Weide
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Information SystemsUniversity of NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations