A Unified Neural Network Model for the Self-organization of Topographic Receptive Fields and Lateral Interaction

  • Joseph Sirosh
  • Risto Miikkulainen
Conference paper


A self-organizing neural network model for the simultaneous development of topographic receptive fields and lateral interactions in cortical maps is presented. Both afferent and lateral connections adapt by the same Hebbian mechanism in a purely local and unsupervised learning process. Afferent input weights of each neuron self-organize into hill-shaped profiles, receptive fields organize topographically across the network, and unique lateral interaction profiles develop for each neuron. The resulting self-organized structure remains in a dynamic and continuously-adapting equilibrium with the input. The model can be seen as a generalization of previous self-organizing models of the visual cortex, and provides a general computational framework for experiments on receptive field development and cortical plasticity. The model also serves to point out general limits on activity-dependent self-organization: when multiple inputs are presented simultaneously, the receptive field centers need to be initially ordered for stable self-organization to occur.


Receptive Field Lateral Interaction Ocular Dominance Cortical Plasticity Lateral Connection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amari, S.-I. (1980). Topographic organization of nerve fields. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 42: 339–364.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Burkhalter, A., Bernardo, K. L., and Charles, V. (1993). Development of local circuits in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 13: 1916–1931.Google Scholar
  3. Gilbert, C. D. (1992). Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics. Neuron, 9: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hubel, D. H., and Wiesel, T. N. (1965). Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28: 229–289.Google Scholar
  5. Kaas, J. H. (1991). Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult animals. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 14: 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Katz, L. C., and Callaway, E. M. (1992). Development of local circuits in mammalian visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15: 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43: 59–69.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohonen, T. (1993). Physiological interpretation of the self-organizing map algorithm. Neural Networks, 6: 895–905.Google Scholar
  9. Löwel, S. (1993). Private CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  10. Löwel, S., and Singer, W. (1992). Selection of intrinsic horizontal connections in the visual cortex by correlated neuronal activity. Science, 255: 209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merzenich, M. M., Recanzone, G. H., Jenkins, W. M., and Grajski, K. A. (1990). Adaptive mechanisms in cortical networks underlying cortical contributions to learning and nondeclarative memory. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Vol. LV, 873–887. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar
  12. Miikkulainen, R. (1991). Self-organizing process based on lateral inhibition and synaptic resource redistribution. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (Espoo, Finland), 415–420. Amsterdam; New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, K. D., Keller, J. B., and Stryker, M. P. (1989). Ocular dominance column development: Analysis and simulation. Science, 245: 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, K. D., and MacKay, D. J. C. (1992). The role of constrains in Hebbian learning. CNS Memo 19, Computation and Neural Systems Program, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Obermayer, K., Blasdel, G. G., and Schulten, K. J. (1992). Statistical-mechanical analysis of self-organization and pattern formation during the development of visual maps. Physical Review A, 45: 7568–7589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pettet, M. W., and Gilbert, C. D. (1992). Dynamic changes in receptive-field size in cat primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89: 8366–8370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sirosh, J., and Miikkulainen, R. (1993). How lateral interaction develops in a self-organizing feature map. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (San Francisco, CA), 1360–1365. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. Sirosh, J., and Miikkulainen, R. (1994). Cooperative self-organization of afferent and lateral connections in cortical maps. Biological Cybernetics, 71 (1): 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. von der Malsburg, C. (1973). Self-organization of orientation-sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetik, 15: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Willshaw, D. J., and von der Malsburg, C. (1976). How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 194: 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Sirosh
    • 1
  • Risto Miikkulainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer SciencesThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations