Evolution of Alzheimer’s disease related cortical lesions
Alzheimer’s disease is an immutably progressing dementing disorder. Its major pathologic hallmark is the gradual development of neurofibrillary changes in a few susceptible nerve cell types. The cortical changes do not occur inevitably with advancing age. Once the disease has begun, spontaneous recovery or remissions are not observed. The initial changes develop in poorly myelinated areas of the temporal lobe. The destructive process then follows a predictable pattern as it extends into other cortical areas. Advanced age is not a prerequisite for the evolution of the lesions. Alzheimer’s disease is thus an age-related, but not an age-dependent disease. The spread of the neurofibrillary changes resembles the process of cortical myelination, however in reverse order.
The human cerebral cortex consists of a small allocortex and an extensive neocortex. The allocortex is located chiefly in the anteromedial portions of the temporal lobe and includes the hippocampal formation and the entorhinal region. The subcortical amygdala is closely related. The parietal, occipital, and temporal neocortices are each comprised of a primary core field, a secondary belt region, and related association areas. Sensory data proceeds through the core and belt fields to the respective association areas, and is then conveyed to the frontal association cortex (prefrontal cortex). Tracts generated in this highest organisational level of the human brain guide the data through the frontal belt (premotor areas) to the primary motor area. The striatal loop and the cerebellar loop provide the major routes for this transport. Part of the stream of data from the sensory association areas branches off and converges upon the entorhinal region and the amygdala (afferent leg of the limbic loop). The information is processed in the entorhinal region, amygdala, and hippocampal formation, and projections from all these areas contribute to the efferent leg of the limbic loop, which heads toward the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1). All components of the limbic loop play a significant role in the maintenance of memory functions. Precisely these areas are susceptible to early and grave pathologic changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Kemper, 1978).
KeywordsNeurofibrillary Tangle Association Area Core Field Cortical Destruction Neuropil Thread
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Braak H, Braak E (1994) Pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. In: Calne DB (ed) Neurodegenerative diseases. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 585–613Google Scholar
- Braak H, Braak E, Yilmazer D, Schultz C, DeVos RAI, Jansen ENH (1995) Nigral and extranigral pathology in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm [Suppl] 46: 15–31Google Scholar
- Duyckaerts C, Delaère P, He Y, Camilleri S, Braak H, Piette F, Hauw JJ (1995) The relative merits of tau- and amyloid markers in the neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease. In: Bergener M, Finkel SI (eds) Treating Alzheimer’s and other dementias. Springer, New York, pp 81–89Google Scholar
- Flechsig P (1920) Anatomie des menschlichen Gehirns und Rückenmarks auf myelogenetischer Grundlage. Thieme, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
- Kemper TL (1978) Senile dementia: a focal disease in the temporal lobe. In: Nandy E (ed) Senile dementia: a biomedical approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 105–113Google Scholar
- McGeer PL, McGeer EG, Akiyama H, Itagaki S, Harrop R, Peppard R (1990) Neuronal degeneration and memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease and aging. Exp Brain Res [Suppl]21: 411–426 Ohm TG, Müller H, Braak H, Bohl J (1995) Close-meshed prevalence rates of different stages as a tool to uncover the rate of Alzheimer’s disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neuroscience 64: 209–217Google Scholar
- Reisberg B, Pattschull-Furlan A, Franssen E, Sclan SG, Kluger A, Dingcong L, Ferris SH (1992) Dementia of the Alzheimer type recapitulates ontogeny inversely on specific ordinal and temporal parameters. In: Kostovic I, Knezevic S, Wisniewski HM, Spillich GJ (eds) Neurodevelopment, aging and cognition. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp 345–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yakovlev PI, Lecours AR (1967) The myelogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain. In: Minkowksi A (ed) Regional development of the brain in early life. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 3–70Google Scholar