Skip to main content

Sustained efficacy and safety of idebenone in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: update on a 2-year double-blind multicentre study

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Journal of Neural Transmission. Supplementa ((NEURAL SUPPL,volume 54))

Summary

The 2-year efficacy and safety of idebenone were studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicentre study in 3 parallel groups of patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) of mild to moderate degree. A total of 450 patients were randomized to either placebo for 12 months, followed by idebenone 90 mg tid for another 12 months (n = 153) or idebenone 90 mg tid for 24 months (n = 148) or 120 mg tid for 24 months (n = 149). The primary outcome measure was the total score of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Total) at month 6. Secondary outcome measures were the ADAS cognitive (ADAS-Cog) and noncognitive score (ADAS-Noncog), the clinical global response (CGI-Improvement), the SKT neuropsychological test battery, and the Nurses’ Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER-Total and IADL subscale). Safety parameters were adverse events, vital signs, ECG and clinical laboratory parameters. During the placebo controlled period (the first year of treatment), idebenone showed statistically significant dose-dependent improvement in the primary efficacy variable ADAS-Total and in all the secondary efficacy variables. There was no evidence for a loss of efficacy during the second year of treatment, as a further improvement of most efficacy variables was found in the second year in comparison to the results at the 12 months visit. Also, a clear dose effect relationship (placebo/90mg < idebenone 90mg < idebenone 120mg) was maintained throughout the second year of treatment. This suggests that idebenone exerts its beneficial therapeutic effects on the course of the disease by slowing down its progression. Safety and tolerability of idebenone were good and similar to placebo during the first year of treatment and did not change during the second year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed, rev. APA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • CPMP Working Party on Efficacy of Medicinal Products (1992) Antidementia medicinal products. Note for guidance (Draft 5). Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzigkeit H (1989) SKT: Ein Kurztest zur Erfassung von Gedächtnis- und Aufmerksamkeitsstörungen (4th ed.) [SKT: A short test to assess impairment of memory and attention]. Beltz Test, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12: 189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutzmann H, Hadler D, Erzigkeit H (1997) Long-term treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with idebenone. In: Iqbal K, Winblad B, Nishimura T, Takeda M, Wisniewki HM (eds) Alzheimer’s disease: biology, diagnosis and therapeutics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 687–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachinski VC, Illiff LD, Zihlka E, DuBoulay GH, McAllister VL, Marshall R, Ross-Russell RW, Symon L (1975) Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 32: 632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanowski S, Ladurner G, Maurer K, Oswald WD, Stein U (1990) Empfehlungen zur Evaluierung der Wirksamkeit von Nootropika. Z Gerontopsychol-psychiatr 3: 67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern U, Menges K (1992) Proof of efficacy of nootropics for the indication “dementia” (Phase III) — Recommendations. Pharmacopsychiatry 25: 126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leber P (1996) Observations and suggestions on antidementia drug development. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 10 [Suppl 1]: 31–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lienert GA (1967) Testaufbau und Testanalyse, 2nd ed. [Test construction and test analysis]. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department Health & Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34: 939–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health (1976) Clinical Global Impressions. In: Guy W (ed) EDCEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, rev ed. NIMH, Rockville, MD, pp 217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL (1984) A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 141: 1356–1364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sano M, et al (1997) A controlled trial of selegiline, alpha-tocopherol, or both as treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 336: 1216–1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senin U, Parnetti L, Barbagallo-Sangiorgi G, Bartorelli L, Bocola V, Capurso A, Cuzzupoli M, Denario M, Marigliano V, Tammaro A, Fioravanti M (1992) Idebenone in senile dementia of Alzheimer type: a multicentre study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 15: 249–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel R, Brunner C, Ermini-Fünfschilling D, Monsch A, Notter M, Puxty J, Tremmel L (1991) A new behavioral assessment scale for geriatric out- and in-patients: the NOSGER (Nurses’ Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients). J Am Geriatr Soc 39: 339–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weyer G, Ihl R, Mohs RC, Schambach M, Denkel A, Kaiser-Kehl H (1993) Validierungsuntersuchungen zu einer deutschen Version der Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale ADAS [Investigations on the validity of a German version of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale ADAS]. Z Gerontopsychol-psychiatr 6: 67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyer G, Erzigkeit H, Hadler D, Kubicki S (1996) Efficacy and safety of idebenone in the long-term treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study. Hum Psychopharmacol 11: 53–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weyer G, Babej-Dölle RM, Hadler D, Hofmann S, Herrmann W (1997) A controlled study of 2 doses of idebenone in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychobiology 11: 340–350

    Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association (1989) Declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects (Amended by the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gutzmann, H., Hadler, D. (1998). Sustained efficacy and safety of idebenone in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: update on a 2-year double-blind multicentre study. In: Gertz, HJ., Arendt, T. (eds) Alzheimer’s Disease — From Basic Research to Clinical Applications. Journal of Neural Transmission. Supplementa, vol 54. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7508-8_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7508-8_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83112-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7508-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics