Light-Driven Global Illumination with a Wavelet Representation of Light Transport

  • Robert R. Lewis
  • Alain Fournier
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)


We describe the basis of the work he have currently under way to implement a new rendering algorithm called light-driven global illumination. This algorithm is a departure from conventional raytracing and radiosity Tenderers which addresses a number of deficiencies intrinsic to those approaches.


Subdivision Scheme Light Flux Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function Global Illumination Soft Shadow 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    James Arvo and David Kirk. A survey of ray tracing acceleration techniques. In Andrew S. Glassner, editor, An Introduction to Ray Tracing, pages 201–262. Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Per H. Christensen, Eric J. Stollnitz, David H. Salesin, and Tony D. DeRose. Global illumination of glossy environments using wavelets and importance. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 15(1):37–71, January 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Fournier, E. Fiume, M. Ouellette, and C. K. Chee. Fiat lux: Light driven global illumination. Technical Memo DGP89-1, Dynamic Graphics Project, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Akira Fujimoto, Takayuki Tanaka, and Kansei Iwata. Arts: Accelerated ray-tracing system. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, pages 16–26, April 1986.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Steven J. Gortler, Peter Schroder, Michael F. Cohen, and Pat Hanrahan. Wavelet radiosity. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 1993, pages 221–230, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Pat Hanrahan, David Salzman, and Larry Aupperle. A rapid hierarchical radiosity algorithm. In Thomas W. Sederberg, editor, Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’91 Proceedings), volume 25, pages 197–206, July 1991.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Marc Levoy and Pat Hanrahan. Light field rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’96 (to appear), 1996.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Robert R. Lewis. Making shaders more physically plausible. Computer Graphics Forum, 13(2):109–120, June 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Robert R. Lewis. Wavelet radiative transport and surface interaction. In John C. Hart, editor, Proceedings of the Seventh Western Computer Graphics Symposium, pages 73–83, March 1996.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Peter Schroder and Pat Hanrahan. Wavelet methods for radiance computations. In Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 303–311, Darmstadt, Germany, June 1994.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Peter Schroeder, Steven Gortler, Michael Cohen, and Pat Hanrahan. Wavelet projections for radiosity. In Michael F. Cohen, Claude Puech, and Francois Sillion, editors, Fourth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 105–114. Eurographics, June 1993. held in Paris, France, 14-16 June 1993.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Brian Smits, James Arvo, and Donald Greenberg. A clustering algorithm for radiosity in complex environments. In Andrew Glassner, editor, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’94 (Orlando, Florida, July 24-29, 1994), Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 435–442. ACM SIGGRAPH, ACM Press, July 1994. ISBN 0-89791-667-0.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien1996 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Lewis
    • 1
  • Alain Fournier
    • 1
  1. 1.Imager Computer Graphics Laboratory, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada

Personalised recommendations