Advertisement

Modern Aspects of Peripheral and Cranial Nerve Surgery

  • M. Samii
Part of the Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery book series (NEUROSURGERY, volume 2)

Abstract

Knowledge of Wallerian degeneration began in 1852 and, following experimental research on degeneration and regeneration of interrupted nerves, surgeons realized that reinnervation of end organs depended on growth of axons through the interrupted area of nerve. Therefore surgeons tried to reanastomose the stumps. Failures of reinnervation could not be blamed on lack of axoplasma metabolism and flow from cell body to suture line because the clinical observation of amputation neuromas and their constant recurrence demonstrated the unfailing delivery of axoplasma by the nerve cell body; at times to the deep concern of the surgeon, and the constant pain of the patient. The electron microscope showed increased size of nerve cell bodies after their axon had been interrupted. This was taken to mean that the cell body had increased its metabolism in trying to form axoplasma, and later neurochemistry investigations proved this was true. Despite the ability of a nerve cell body to continue production of axoplasma indefinitely, when there is a barrier to the flow of axoplasm peripherally, no reinnervation of end organs can occur.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Afanassieff, A., 1967: Premiers résultats de 20 homogreffes de nerfs conservés par le cialit (Main et avantbras). La Presse Médicale 27, 75, 1409–1410.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Afanassieff, A., 1970: Introduction et conclusion de la commission des nerfs aux Journées de Venise 1970. Chir. de la Main 29, 3 7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albert, E., 1878: Einige Operationen an Nerven. Ber. d. Naturwissen. med. Vereins Innsbruck 9, 97–106.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderl, II., 1973: Reconstruction of the face through Cross-Face-Nerve transplantation in facial paralysis. Chirurgia plastica 2, 17–46.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ashley, F., 1968: Axon Growth through irradiated median and ulnar nerve homografts in Primates. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 42, 313 322.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ballance, C., Duel, A. B., 1932: The operative treatment of facial palsy by the introduction of nerve grafts. Arch. otolaryng. 15, 1–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bedeschi, P., 1972: Traumatic injuries of peripheral nerves. Orthop. Ital. 1, 162–170.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berger, A., Millesi, H., und Ganglberger, J., 1967: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Nervennaht mit Klebstoffen. Berichte Intern. Symposium über Klebestoffe in der Chirurgie. Wien 1967.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger, A., Meissl, G., und Samii, M., 1970: Experimentelle Erfahrungen mit Kollagenfolien über nahtlose Nervenanastomosen. Acta Neurochir. 23, 141–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bethe, A., 1903: Allgemeine Anatomie und Physiologie des Nervensystems. Leipzig: Thieme. 1903.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bethe, A., 1916: Zwei neue Methoden der Überbrückung größerer Nervenlücken. Dt. med. Wschr. 42, 1277–1311.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bielschowsky, M., und Unger, E., 1918: Überbrückung großer Nervenlücken. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Degeneration und Regeneration peripherer Nerven. J. Physiol. Neurol. 22, 267–316.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bora, W., 1967: Peripheral nerve repair in cats. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 49-A, 4, 659–666.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Böhler, J., 1963: Weitere Erfahrungen mit der Mikrofilterumscheidung von Nervennähten und homoioplastischen Nerventransplantaten. Langenbeck’s Arch. klin. Chir. 304, 944–956.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Braun, R. M., 1966: Comparative studies of neurorrhaphy and sutureless peripheral nerve repair. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 122, 15–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brooks, D., 1955: The place of nerve grafting in orthopaedic surgery. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 37 A, 299–317.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brunnelli, G., 1969: Attuali orientamenti per la riparazione dei nervi della mano Rivista di chirurgia della mano 7, 40–43.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buch, V., 1970: Experimental study of radiated vs. fresh nerve homograft. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 45, 586 598.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bunnell, S., 1927: Surgery of the nerves of the hand. Surg. Gynec. and Obstet. 44, 145–150.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bunnell, S., and Boyes, J. H., 1939: Nerve grafts. Amer. J. Surg. 44, 64–75.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cajal, S. R., 1928: Degeneration and regeneration of the nervous system, Oxford 1928.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Campbell, J. B., Bassett, C. A. L., Girardo, J. M., Seymor, R. J., and Rossi, J. P., 1956: Application of monomolecular filter tubes in bridging gaps in peripheral nerves and for prevention of neuroma formation: a preliminary report. J. Neurosurg. 13, 635–637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Campbell, J. B., Bassett, C. A. L., Husby, J., and Noback, C. R., 1957: Axonal regeneration in the transected adult feline spinal cord. Surg. Forum 8, 528–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Campbell, J. B., Bassett, C. A. L., 1957: The surg. application of monomolecular filter (millipore) to bridge gaps in peripheral nerves and to prevent neuroma formation. Surg. Forum 7, 570–571.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campbell, J. B., Bassett, C. A. L., Husby, J., Thulin, C., and Feringa, E., 1961: Microfilter sheaths in peripheral nerve surgery. Reprinted from the Journal of Trauma 1, Nr. 2, 139–155.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Campbell, J. B., 1966: Kongreß der SICOT, September 1966 in Paris.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Conley, J. J., 1955: Facial nerve grafting in treatment of parotid gland tumors; new technic. Arch. Surg. 70, 359.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ducker, T. B., and Hayes, J., 1970: Peripheral nerve grafts: Experimental studies in the dog and chimpanzee to define homograft limitations. J. Neurosurg. 1, 32, 236–243.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duel, A. B., 1934: The operative treatment of facial palsy. Brit. Med. J. 2, 1027.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Edshage, S., 1964: Peripheral nerve suture. Acta chir. scand. Suppl. 331, 1–104.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferlitsch, D., and Goldner, L., 1964: Evaluation of the effect of Methyl-2Cyanoacrylate in Peripheral Nerves. South. Med. J. 58, 679–685.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fisch, U., 1970: Die totale Freilegung des Nervus facialis bei laterobasalen Schädelfrakturen. Archiv Ohren-, Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde 196, Heft 2, 187–193.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Foerster, O., 1916: Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1235–1246.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Foerster, O., 1929: Handbuch der Neurologie, Teil II, Abs. 3. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Freeman, B. S., 1965: Adhesive neural anastomosis. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 35, 167–176.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gabrielson, G., and Stendström, S., 1966: A contribution to peripheral nerve suture. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 38, 68–71.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gosset, A., and Bertrand, I. C. R., 1935: C. R. Acad. Sci. 200, 1897–1901.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gosset, A., and Bertrand, J. C. R., 1938: J. Chir. (Paris) 51, 481–485.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gutmann, E., and Sanders, F. K., 1943: Recovery of fibre numbers and diameters in the regeneration of peripheral nerves. J. physiol. 101, 489–518.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hakstian, R. W., 1968: Funicular orientation by direct stimulation. An aid to peripheral nerve repair. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 50 A, 1178–1186.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hausamen, J. E., Samii, M., and Schmidseder, R., 1973: Repair of the mandibular nerve by means of autologous nerve grafting after resection of the lower jaw. J. max.-fac. Burg. 1, 74–78.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Heiss, W. H., und Faul, P., 1965: Nervennaht mit Klebstoff. Langenbeck’s Arch. klin. Chir. 313, 710 713.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Highet, W. B., and Holmes, W., 1943: Traction injuries to the lateral poplitea nerve and traction injuries to peripheral nerves after suture. Brit. J. Surg. 30, 212–233.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Highet, W. B., and Sanders, F. K., 1943: The effect of stretching nerves after suture. Brit. J. Surg. 30, 355–369.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hiller, F., 1951: Nerve regeneration in grafts. J. Neuropath. and clin. Neurol. 1, 5–14.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Holmgren, G., 1923: Some experiences in surgery of otosclerosis. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockholm) 5, 460–466.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    House, W. F., 1961: Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle cranial fossa. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 71, 1363 to 1385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Huber, G. C., 1919: Transplantation of peripheral nerves. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chicago) 2, 466–473.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Huber, G. C., 1920: Repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 30, 464–469.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hueter, 1955: Zit. n. Nigst, Die Chirurgie der peripheren Nerven. Stuttgart: G. Thieme.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ishikawa, F., 1966: Experimental studies in nerve suturing. Medical Journ. of Hiroshima Univ.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jacobson, J. H., 1963: Microsurgical technique in the repair of the traumatized extremity. Clinical orthopaedics 29, 132–145.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jacoby, W., Fahlbruch, R., Mackert, B., Braun, B., Rolle, J., und Schnell, J., 1970: Überbrückung peripherer Nervendefekte mit lyophilisierten und desantigenisierten Transplantaten. Munch. Med. Wschr. 112, 586–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jacoby, W., Fahlbruch, R., Mackert, B., 1972: Indikationen und Technik der Überbrückung von Nervendefekten mit homologen lyophilisierten Nerven. Melsunger Med. Mitteilungen 46, Heft 116, 209–220.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kirschner, G., 1917: Zur Behandlung größerer Nervendefekte. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 24, 739–747.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Krenkel, W., 1967: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der operativen Behandlung peripherer Nervenschädigung. Chir.-Plast. Reconstr. 3, 21–31.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Krumbholz, S., Schyra, B., und Winnefeld, K., 1967: Die Einwirkung von Akrylsäurederivaten auf das morphologische Bild der peripheren Nerven. Zbl. chir. 92, 1776–1780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kurze, T., 1964: Microtechniques in neurological surgery. Clin. Neuros. 11, 128–137.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lehmann, R. A., and Hayes, G. J., 1967: Degeneration and Regeneration in peripheral nerve. Brain 90, 285–296.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lewis, H. P., and McLaurin, R. L., 1969: Application of tissue transplant technique to experimental nerve grafting. J. Trauma 9, 227–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Loebke, 1955: Zit. n. Nigst, Die Chirurgie der peripheren Nerven. Stuttgart: G. Thieme.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lundborg, G., and Rydevik, B., 1973: Effects of stretching the tibial nerve of the rabbit. A preliminary study of the intraneural circulation and the barrier function of the perineurium. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 55 B, 390–401.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lyons, W. R., and Woodhall, B., 1949: Atlas of peripheral nerve injury. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Marmor, L., 1964: Regeneration of peripheral nerves by irradiated homografts. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 46 A, 383–394.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Marmor, L., Foster, J. M., Carlson, G. J., and Appels, J. C., 1966: Experimental irradiated nerve homografts. J. Neurosurg. 24, 656–664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Marmor, L., 1967: Peripheral nerve regeneration using nerve grafts. Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C ThomasGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Marmor, L., and Hirasawa, Y., 1969: Peripheral nerve homo- and heterografts: The effect of various irradiation doses and the lapse of time before implantation. Japan. J. Exp. Med. 39, 417–426.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Matras, Helene, Dinges, H. P., Lassmann, H., und Mamoli, B., 1972: Zur nahtlosen interfaszikulären Nerventransplantation im Tierexperiment. Wien. Med. Wschr. 122, Jahrg. 37, 517–523.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Maxion, H., Samii, M., Scheinpflug, W., und Wallenborn, R., 1972: Elektromyographische Verlaufsuntersuchungen nach Nervennaht und Nerventransplantation beim Kaninchen. Z. EEG und EMG 2, 89–94.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    McCarty, C. S., 1951: Two-stage autograft for repair of extensive damage to sciatic nerve. J. Neurosurg. 8, 319–327.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Meier, C., und Sollmann, H., 1972: Neurotisation homologer lyophilisierter Nerventransplantate. Res. exp. Med. 157, 237–240.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Metz, R., and Seeger, W., 1969: Collagen wrapping of nerve homotransplants in dogs. Europ. Surg. Res. 1, 157–160.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Michon, J., et Masse, P., 1964: Le moment optimum de la suture nerveuse dans les paies du membre supérieur. Rev. Chir. orthop. 50, 2, 205, 212.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Michon, J., 1966: Les sutures nerveuses. Communication au X. Congrès de la SICOT Paris 1966.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Midgley, R. D., and Woolhouse, F. M., 1968: Silastic sheathing technique for the Anastomosis of nerves and tendons. Canad. Med. Ass. J. Mar 16, 98, 550–551.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Miehlke, A., 1960: Die Chirurgie des N. facialis. Berlin-München: Urban dongliand Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Mikulicz, 1955: Zit. n. H. Nigst, Die Chirurgie der peripheren Nerven. Stuttgart: G. Thieme.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Millesi, H., Ganglberger, J., und Berger, A., 1967: Erfahrungen mit der Mikrochirurgie peripherer Nerven. Chir. Plast. Reconstr. 3, 47–55.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Millesi, H., 1968: Zum Problem der Überbrückung von Defekten peripherer Nerven. Wien. Med. Wschr. 118, Nr. 9 /10, 182–187.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Millesi, H., 1969: Wiederherstellung durchtrennter peripherer Nerven und Nerventransplantation. Munch. Med. Wschr. 111, Nr. 52, 2669–2674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Millesi, H., Meissl, G., und Berger, A., 1970: Entwicklungstendenzen in der operativen Wiederherstellung durchtrennter peripherer Nerven. Bolesti i ozljeda Sake Medicinska Naklada Zagreb, 161–175.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Millesi, H., Meissl, G., 1972: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Heilung durchtrennter peripherer Nerven. Chir. plast. 1, 174–206.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Millesi, H., Meissl, G., und Berger, A., 1972: The interfascicular Nerve-Grafting of the Median and Ulnar Nerves. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 54 A, Nr. 4, 727–750.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Motta, A., 1971: La nostra esperienza negli innesti di nervo all-arto superiore. Chirurgie de la Main (Toulouse) 31, 11–17.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mumenthaler, M., und Schliack, H., 1965: Läsion peripherer Nerven. Stuttgart: G. Thieme.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Nageotte, J., 1917: Sur la greffe des tissus morts et la réparation des nerfs. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 80, 459–465.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Nigst, H., 1957: Freie Nerventransplantation und Cortison. Basel, Stuttgart: B. Schwabe.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Palazzi, S., Coll y Marrero, R. M., 1971: La mierocirurgia en las lesiones de los nervios perifericos. Revista de Ortopedia y Traumatologie 15, I B, Fas. 4, 499–526.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Perl, J. I., and Wagner, R. J., 1965: Intrathoracic phrenic Nerve repair. J. d. Intern. Coll. Surg. 44, 171–178.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Petrov, M., and Solarov, T., 1966: Nervenautoplastiken. Munch. Med. Wschr. 14, 752–759.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Philipeaux, J. M., et Vulpian, A., 1870: Note sur les essai de greffe d’un troncon de nerf lingual entre les deux bouts de l’hypoglosse. Arch. Physiol. norm. pathol. 3, 618–620.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Pinner-Poole, B., Tomasula, J., and Campbell, J. B., 1966: Nerve suture and nerve grafts. Xe Congrès de la Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie, 782–798.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sakellarides, H., 1962: A follow up study of 173 peripheral nerve injuries in the upper extremity in Cevilians. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 44 A, 140–152.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Samii, M., and Willebrand, H., 1970: The technique of and indications for autologous interfascicular nerve transplantation. Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series No. 217, 39.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Samii, M., Schürmann, K., Scheinpflug, W., and Wallenborn, R., 1971: Experimental studies comparing grafting with autogenous and irradiated freeze dried homologous nerves. Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series No 287, 263–266.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Samii, M., 1972: Die operative Wiederherstellung verletzter Nerven. Langenbeck’s Arch. Chir. 332, 355–362.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Samii, M., Schürmann, K., Wallenborn, R., und Scheinpflug, W., 1972: Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen über autologe und homologe Nerventransplantationen. Med. Mitt. Melsungen 46, 116, 33–339.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Samii, M., und Kahl, R. I., 1972 Klinische Resultate der autologen Nerventransplantation. Med. Mitt. Melsungen 46, 116, 197–202.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Samii, M., 1972: Autologe Nerventransplantation im Trigeminusbereich. Med. Mitt. Melsungen 46, 116, 189–194.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Samii, M., und Wallenborn, R., 1972: Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen über den Einfluß der Spannung auf den Regenerationserfolg nach Nervennaht. Acta Neurochir. 27, 87–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Samii, M., 1972: Die operative Versorgung peripherer Nervenverletzungen. Therapie-Woche 22, 27, 2164–2170.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Samii, M., 1973: Interfaszikuläre autologe Nerventransplantation. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 70, 19, 1257–1262.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Samii, M., 1973: Indication and operative technique of birth injuries of the brachial plexus. III. European Congress of pediatric neurosurgery Göttingen 1972. (In print.)Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Samii, M., und Scheinpflug, W., 1974: Klinische, elektromyographische und quantitativ histologische Untersuchungen nach Nerventransplantation. Acta Neurochir. 30, 1–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Samii, M., 1974: Intraneurale Neurolyse beim Carpaltunnelsyndrom. Handchirurgie im Druck.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Samii, M., 1973: Use of microtechniques in peripheral nerve surgery. Experience with over 300 cases. Symposium Microneurosurgery, Kyoto/Japan, in print.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Samii, M., 1973: Verletzungen der Hirnnerven und des Plexus brachialis. Vortrag 37. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallheilkunde Berlin, in print.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Sanders, F. K., 1942: The repair of large gaps in the peripheral nerves. Brain 65, 281–337.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Seddon, H. J., 1942: A classification of nerve injuries. Brit. med. J. 1, 237–288.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Seddon, H. J., and Holmes, W., 1944: Late condition of nerve homografts in man Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 79, 342–349.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Seddon, H. J., 1947: The use of autogenous grafts for the repair of large gaps in peripheral ne acs. Brit. J. Surg. 35, 151–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Seddon, H. J., 1963: Nerve grafting. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 45, 447–461.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Seddon, H. J., 1968: Fortschritte in der Behandlung von Nervenverletzungen. Triangel 8, 252–258.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Seddon, H. J., 1972: Surgical disorders of the peripheral nerves. Edinburgh and London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Seiffert, K. E., und Schindler, P., 1968: Untersuchungen zur Antigenität des Nervengewebes. Exp. Chir. 1, 182–194.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Smith, J. W., 1971: A new technique of facial animation. Transaction of the Vth Int. Congr. of Plast. Surg., p. 83–84. Sydney, Australia: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Smith, J. W., 1964: Microsurgery of peripheral nerves. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 33, 317 329.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Sollmann, H., 1972: Homologe Nervenimplantate. Med. Mitt. Melsungen 46, 116, 241 242.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Swan, 1942: Zit. n. F. K. Sanders: The repair of large gaps in the peripheral nerve. Brain 65, 281–337.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Stellbring, G., 1969: Modifizierter Stenström’scher Nervenhalter für die Chirurgie der peripheren Nerven. Der Chirurg 40, 424 425.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Strange, F. G., 1947: An operation for nerve pedicle grafting. Brit. J. Surg. 34, 423–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Thomson, N., 1971: Autogenous free grafts of skeletal muscle. A priliminary experimental and clinical study. Plastic. reconstr. Surg. 48, 1, 11–27.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Thomson, N., 1971: Treatment of facial paralysis by free skeletal muscle grafts. Transaction of the Vth Int. Congr. of Plast. Surg., p. 66–82. Sydney, Australia: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Weiss, P., and Taylor, A. C., 1943: Repair of peripheral nerves by grafts of frozen dried nerve. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 52, 326–332.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Wilhelm, A., 1968: Rekonstruktive Eingriffe an der Hand nach Verletzungen. Operative Rekonstruktion nach Handverletzungen. Chirurg 39, 393–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Wilhelm, A., 1972: Klinische Resultate nach homologen Nerventransplantationen mit lyophilisierten Nerven. Med. Mitt. Melsungen 46, 116, 231–238.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Wilhelm, A., Young, J. Z., Holms, W., and Sanders, F. K., 1940: Nerve regeneration: Importance of the peripheral stump and the value of nerve grafts. The Lancet 3, 128–130.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Wilhelm, A., and Medawar, P. B., 1940: Die Kabeltransplantate mit Fibrin. Lancet 126, 239–245.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Zeumer, und Heidel, H.-J., 1967: Die Nervenvereinigung unter Verwendung eines kaltpolymerisierenden Kunststoffklebers. Zbl. Chir. 92, 1772–1776.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Samii
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurosurgical ClinicUniversity of MainzFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations