Skip to main content

Urticales, Their Differentiation and Systematic Position

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Urticales constitute a group of plants with surprising diversity and confusing complexity, especially in the Moraceae round which family the present paper is centred. Main trends in the differentiation of the growth habit, flower, fruit, and inflorescence are sketched and as far as possible connected to distribution, pollination, and dispersal. The reduced state of the urticalean flower is a main factor in the differentiation of the reproductive structures. Two main complexes may be distinguished in the variation patterns: one centred round adaptations to wind pollination, the other round adaptations to insect pollination, the latter resulting in several types of pseudanthous or pseudocarpous inflorescences. In both complexes there occur well adapted large genera (Ficus, Cecropia) and apparently less well adapted, as well large genera (Dorstenia, Elatostema). The Urticales appear to belong to a central complex in the Angiosperms. The affinity of the order with the Malvales is reasonably clear, while its connections with the Hamamelidales and their allies are much more vague.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bechtel, A. R., 1921: The floral anatomy of the Urticales. Amer. Jour. Bot. 8, 386–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. C., 1972: Flora Neotropica Monograph No. 7. Olmedieae and Brosimeae (Moraceae). New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. C., 1973:.Some remarks on the classification and differentiation of Moraceae. Meded. Bot. Mus. Herb. Utrecht No. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. C., 1977: The Castilleae, a tribe of the Moraceae, renamed and redefined due to the exclusion of the genus Olmedia from the “Olmedieae”. Acta Bot. Neerl. 26, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernbeck, F., 1932: Vergleichende Morphologie der Urticaceen- und Moraceen-Infloreszenzen. Bot. Abhandl. Heft 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carauta, J. P. P., Valente, M. da C., and Sucre, B. D., 1974: Dorstenia L. (Moraceae) dos Estados da Guanabara e do Rio de Janeiro. Rodriguésia 27, 225–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1933: A revision of the Malayan species of Ficus: Covellia and Neomorphe. Jour. Malay. Br. Asiat. Soc. 11, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1949: The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Ann. Bot. N. S. 13, 367–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1960: Taxonomic notes on Ficus Linn., Asia and Australasia. Gard. Bull. Singapore 17, 368–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1962: The classification of Moraceae. Gard. Bull. Singapore 19, 187–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1967: Ficus in the Solomon Islands and its bearing on the Post-Jurassic history of Melanesia. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B. 252, 23–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1968: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., 1975: A system of classification of the Angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Notiser. 128, 119–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1970: Die Infloreszenzen der apetalen Hamamelidaceen, ihre grundsätzliche morphologische und systematische Bedeutung. Bot. Jahrb. 90, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1975: Nachbarliche Formbeziehungen mit Hüllfunktion im Infloreszenz- und Blütenbereich. Bot. Jahrb. 96, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., and Pijl, L. van der, 1971: The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford etc.: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F., 1944: Die Samenbildung und die Zytology bei agamosper-mischen und sexuellen Arten von Elatostema und einigen nahestehenden Gattungen nebst Beleuchtung einiger damit zusammenhängender Probleme. Kung. Svensk Vet. Akad. Handl. 21, 1–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorov, A. A., 1969: Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Leningrad: V. L. Komarov Botan. Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golenkin, M., 1894: Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Inflorescenzen der Urticaceen und Moraceen. Flora 78, 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R., 1974: The geography of flowering plants. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, A., 1946: Apomixis in higher plants. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N. F. Avd. 2, 42, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, F., and Oldeman, R. A. A., 1970: Essai sur l’architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Paris: Masson & Cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1903: Über die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse bei Engler’s Rosalen, Parietalen, Myrtifloren und in anderen Ordnungen der Dikotylen. Abhandl. Naturw. Hamburg 18, 3–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heel, W. A. van, 1966: Morphology of the androecium in Malvales. Blumea 13, 174–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, F. M., 1959–1960: Studies in Artocarpus and allied genera. Jour. Arnold Arb. 40, 1–37, 113–155, 298–368;

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, F. M., 1959–1960: Studies in Artocarpus and allied genera. Jour. Arnold Arb. 41, 73–140, 320–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan Koriba, 1958: On the periodicity of tree growth in the tropics. Gard. Bull. Singapore 17, 11–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Coq, C., 1963: Contributions à l’étude cyto-taxinomique des Moracées et des Urticacées. Revue Gen. Bot. 70, 385–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse, A. D. J., 1975: Floral evolution in the Hamamelididae. III. Hantamelidales and associated groups including Urticales, and final conclusions. Acta. Bot. Neerl. 24, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington, W. F., and Chaney, W. R., 1973: Shedding of shoots and branches. In: Shedding of plant parts (Kozlowski, S. T.), 149–204. New York-London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planchon, J. E., 1848: Sur les Ulmacées et la famille des Urticées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Paris Bot. III. 10, 244–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pul, L. van der, 1972: Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., 1975: The bases of Angiosperm phylogeny: Cytology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62, 724–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. W., 1972: The tropical rain forest. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, J., 1968: Sur le comportement des axes aériens chez quelques plantes à rameaux végétatifs polymorphes; le concept de rameaux plagiotrope. Ann. Sci. Nat. Paris. Bot. XII. 9, 109–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. R., 1965: Morphological and anatomical investigations on Artocarpus Forst. III. The flower. Phytomorphology 15, 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., 1963: Shoot apices in the family Moraceae with a seasonal study of Maclura pomifera (Raf.) Schneid. Bull.Torrey Bot. Club 90, 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering plant. Evolution above the species level. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1969: Flowering plants. Origin and dispersal. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1968: Synopsis of putatively phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 6, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippo, O., 1938: Comparative anatomy of the Moraceae and their presumed allies. Bot. Gaz. 100, 1–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P. B., and Gill, A. M., 1973: Growth habits of tropical trees: Some guiding principles. In: Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America: A comparative review (Meggers, B. J., Ayensu, E.S., and Duckworth, W. D.), 129–143. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L., 1967: The genera of Euphorbiaceae in the Southeastern United States. Jour. Arnold Arb. 48, 303–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L., 1975: Conspectus of a new classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Taxon 24, 593–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weddell, H. A., 1856–1857: Monographie de la famille des Urticées. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 19, 1–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, H., 1969: Wind pollination in the Angiosperms: Evolutionary and environmental considerations. Evolution 23, 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C., 1975: Tropical rain forests of the Far East. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berg, C.C. (1977). Urticales, Their Differentiation and Systematic Position. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution / Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen, vol 1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-81434-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7076-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics