Abstract
The more characters to distinguish monocotyledons and dicotyledons that are taken into consideration, the more numerous become the families which exhibit both mono- and dicotyledonous characters. In particular, monocotyledons and ranalean dicotyledons appear intimately related and the gaps between them do not allow a distinction into classes to be made. The author, therefore, considers the monocotyledons and the ranalean dicotyledons as two extreme wings of a single natural unit, with the Annonaceae, Aristolochiaceae, Nymphaeaceae, and Piperaceae as connecting links. Within the monocotyledonous wing, 12 natural units of higher than ordinal level (superorders) may be tentatively recognized and arranged according to the number of dicotyledonous features they possess and to the degree of their systematic isolation. Whereas the groups which present at least a few clearly dicotyledonous characters (like Arales and Helobiae) occupy a more isolated position, the reduction or absence of dicotyledonous characters (as in the anemophilous monocotyledons) is accompanied by decreasing isolation. This indicates that among monocotyledons which have attained a high evolutionary level, convergence largely camouflages relationship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Behnke, H.-D., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Ultrastructure. Annals Missouri Bot. Gard. 62, 647–663.
Carlquist, S., 1975: Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
Cheadle, V. I., 1953: Independent origin of vessels in the monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Phytomorphology 3, 23–44.
Cheadle, V. I. and Tucker, I. M., 1961: Vessels and phylogeny of monocotyledons. In: Recent Advances in Botany (IX. International Bot. Congress 1959) 1, 161–165. Toronto.
Corner, E.J.H., 1976: The Seeds of the Dicotyledons. Vol. 1, 2. Cambridge: University Press.
Dahlgren, R., 1974–1976: Angiospermernes taxonomi, bind 1–4. København: Akademisk Forlag.
Davis, G. L., 1966: Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. New York-London-Sidney: John Wiley & Sons.
Emberger, L., 1960: Les végétaux vasculaires. In: Traité de botanique (Systématique), (M. Chadefaud et L. Emberger), tome 2. Paris: Masson & Cie.
Engler, A., 1964: Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 12. Aufl. (Melchior, H., Hrsg.). Berlin: Borntraeger.
Erdtman, G., 1952: Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy: Angiosperms. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
Fries, R. E., 1959: Annonaceae. In: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2. Aufl., Band 17 a II. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Haines, R. W., and Lye, K. A., 1975: Seedlings of Nymphaeaceae. Bot. Journ. Linn. Soc. 70, 255–265.
Hamann, U., 1961: Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Farinosae. Willdenowia 2, 639–768.
Hamann, U., 1962: Weiteres über Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der “Farinosae”. Willdenowia 3, 169–207.
Hänsel, R., Leuschke, A., and Gomez-Pompa, A., 1975: Aporphine-type alkaloids from Piper auritum. Lloydia 38, 529–530.
Hegnauer, R., 1963: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen, Band 2: Monocotyledoneae. Basel und Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.
Huber, H., 1969: Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Liliifloren. Mitt. Bot. Staates. München 8, 219–538.
Meeuse, A. D. J., 1975: Aspects of the evolution of the monocotyledons. Acta Bot. Neerl. 24, 421–436.
Moore, H. E., Jr., and Uhl, N. W., 1973: Palms and the origin and evolution of the monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol. 48, 414–436.
Netolitzky, F., 1926: Anatomie der Angiospermen-Samen. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, Band 10. Berlin: Borntraeger.
Porsch, O., 1914: Die Abstammung der Monokotylen und die Blütennektarien. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 31, 580–590.
Ramstad, E., 1953: Über das Vorkommen und die Verbreitung von Chelidonsäure in einigen Pflanzenfamilien. Pharm. Act. Helv. 28, 45–57.
Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering Plants. Evolution Above the Species Level. London: E. Arnold.
Stebbins, G. L. and Khush, G. S., 1961: Variation in the organisation of the stomatal complex in the leaf epidermis of monocotyledons and its bearing on their phylogeny. Am. Journ. Bot. 48, 51–59.
Stone, B. C., 1972: A reconsideration of the evolutionary status of the family Pandanaceae and its significance in monocotyledon phylogeny. Quart. Rev. Biol. 47, 34–45.
Suessenguth, K., 1920: Beiträge zur Frage des systematischen Anschlusses der Monocotylen. Beih. Bot. Zbl. 38 (II), 1–79.
Thorne, R. T., 1968: Synopsis of a putatively phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 6, 57–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huber, H. (1977). The Treatment of the Monocotyledons in an Evolutionary System of Classification. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution / Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen, vol 1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-81434-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7076-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive