Abstract
Pollination by beetles seems to have strongly influenced the evolution of angiosperm flowers. Beetles are a predominant group of potential visitors and pollinators of flowers since earliest times, so cantharophily is apparent within groups of flowering plants of the most diverse evolutionary levels. In the subclass Magnoliidae, cantharophily is a dominant feature of many families, but even in these archaic groups a more open, unspecialized type of beetle pollination and a more specialized one can be distinguished. Specialization here was probably connected with increase in flower size, numerical increase and grouping and flattening of the sexual organs, etc. The strongly protogynous flower attracts beetles through imitative odours, to which the insects are already conditioned in their other activities. Secondary polyandry, such as occurs in the more basic groups of Rosidae, Dilleniidae and Caryophyllidae, is in many cases related to cantharophily and may find its functional explanation in this mode of pollination. This probably somewhat more recent radiation into beetle-pollination might have caused the stamens to increase in number in order to save some of them from the crude visitors. Cantharophily in secondarily polyandrous groups is also frequently connected with the proto-gynous condition of flowers and with odours which act directly on the instincts of the visitors. During these new waves of flower-biological radiation other insects besides beetles must have already been in existence. The pollination of primitive Rosidae, Dilleniidae and Caryophyllidae is therefore much less exclusive compared with the Magnoliidae, viz., beetles and other insects often frequent flowers jointly. Since beetles have continued as the predominant insect group until today, cantharophily can be observed also in advanced groups of angiosperms. In this case, cantharophily is no longer a sign of primitiveness as it is in the Magnoliidae and to some extent probably also in secondarily polyandrous groups, but a relatively recent adaptation into a still existing ecological niche.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, H. G., Baker, J., and Opler, P.A., 1973: Stigmatic exudates and pollination. In: Pollination and Dispersal (Brantjes, N. B. M., and Linskens, H. F., eds.), 47–60. Nijmegen: Dept. Bot., Kath. Universiteit.
Carlquist, S., 1969: Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology 19, 332–362.
Corner, E. J. H., 1940: Wayside trees of Malaya. Vol. 1. Singapore: Government Printing Office.
Daumann, E., 1930: Das Blütennektarium von Magnolia und die Futterkörper von Calycanthus. Planta 11, 108–116.
Delpino, F., 1873: Ulteriori osservazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale. Milano: G. Bernardoni.
Diels, L., 1916: Käferblumen bei den Ranales und ihre Bedeutung für die Phylogenie der Angiospermen. Ber. deutsch, bot. Ges. 34, 758–774.
Ehrendorfer, F., 1976: Evolutionary significance of chromosomal differentiation patterns in gymnosperms and primitive angiosperms. In: Origin and early evolution of angiosperms (Beck, C. B., ed.), 220–240. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ehrendorfer, F., Krendl, F., Habeler, E., and Sauer, W., 1968: Chromosome numbers and evolution in primitive angiosperms. Taxon 17, 337–353.
Faegri, K., 1965: Reflections on the development of pollination systems in African Proteaceae. J. South Afr. Bot. 31, 133–136.
Faegri, K., and Pul, L. Van Der, 1971: The principles of pollination ecology. Ed. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Fries, R. E., 1959: Annonaceae. In: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (Engler, A., and Prantl, K., eds.), Ed. 2, 17aII, 1–171. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Gottsberger, G., 1970: Beiträge zur Biologie von Annonaceen-Blüten. Österr. bot. Z. 118, 237–279.
Gottsberger, G., 1974: The structure and function of the primitive angiosperm flower—a discussion. Acta bot. Neerl. 23, 461–471.
Grant, V., 1950a: The pollination of Calycanthics occidentalis. Amer. J. Bot. 37, 294–297.
Grant, V., 1950b: The protection of the ovules in flowering plants. Evolution 4, 179–201.
Grant, V., and Grant, K., 1965: Flower pollination in the Phlox family. New York-London: Columbia Univ. Press.
Hamilton, A. G., 1897: On the fertilisation of Eupomatia laurina R. Br. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 22, 48–55.
Heiser, Ch. B., 1962: Some observations on pollination and compatibility in Magnolia. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 72, 259–266.
Knoll, F., 1914: Zur Ökologie und Reizphysiologie des Andröceums von Cistus salvifolius L. Jahrb. wiss. Bot. 54, 498–527.
Knoll, F., 1956: Die Biologie der Blüte. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer.
Knuth, P., 1904–1905: Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. 3. Band, 1. und 2. Teil (Loew, E., ed.). Leipzig: Verlag W. Engelmann.
Kral, R., 1960: A revision of Asimina and Deeringothamnus (Annonaceae). Brittonia 12, 233–278.
Kubitzki, K., 1973: Probleme der Großsystematik der Blütenpflanzen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 85, 259–277.
Kubitzki, K., and Vink, W., 1967: Flavonoid-Muster der Polycarpicae als systematisches Merkmal. II. Untersuchungen an der Gattung Drimys. Bot. Jb. 87, 1–16.
Leins, P., 1964: Das zentripetale und zentrifugale Androecium. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 77, 22–26.
Leins, P., 1971: Das Androecium der Dikotylen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 84, 191–193.
Leppik, E. E., 1960: Early evolution of flower types. Lloydia 23, 72–92.
Leppik, E. E., 1964: Floral evolution in the Ranunculaceae. Iowa State J. Sci. 39, 1–101.
Leppik, E. E., 1970: Evolutionary differentiation of the flower head of the Compositae. II. Ann. Bot. Fennici 7, 325–352.
Pervukhina, N. V., 1967: The pollination of the primary angiosperms and the evolution of modes of pollination (Russ.). Bot. Zh. (Moskow) 52, 157–188.
Pijl, L. Van Der, 1953: On the flower biology of some plants from Java. Ann. Bogor. 1, 77–99.
Pijl, L. Van Der, 1960: Ecological aspects of flower evolution. I. Phyletic evolution. Evolution 14, 403–416.
Pijl, L. Van Der, 1961: Ecological aspects of flower evolution. II. Zoophilous flower classes. Evolution 15, 44–59.
Pijl, L. Van Der 1969: Evolutionary action of tropical animals on the reproduction of plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1, 85–96.
Porsch, O., 1939: Das Bestäubungsleben der Kakteenblüte. Cactaceae, Jahrb. deutsch. Kakteen-Ges., 1–142.
Porsch, O., 1950: Geschichtliche Lebenswertung der Kastanienblüte. Österr. bot. Z. 97, 269–321.
Prance, G. T., and Arias, J. R., 1975: A study of the floral biology of Victoria amazonica (Poepp.) Sowerby (Nymphaeaceae). Acta Amaz. 5, 109–139.
Proctor, M., and Yeo, P., 1973: The pollination of flowers. Glasgow: W. Collins Sons and Co. Ltd.
Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
Thien, L. B., 1974: Floral biology of Magnolia. Amer. J. Bot. 61, 1037–1045.
Thien, Heimermann, W. H., and Holman, R. T., 1975: Floral odors and quantitative taxonomy of Magnolia and Liriodendron. Taxon 24, 557–568.
Uphof, J. C. Th., 1933: Die nordamerikanischen Arten der Gattung Asimina. Mitt. deutsch, dendrol. Ges. 45, 61–76.
Wagenitz, G., 1976: Systematics and phylogeny of the Compositae (Asteraceae). Plant Syst. vol. 125, 29–46.
Wester, P. J., 1910: Pollination experiments with Anonas. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 37, 529–539.
Zimmerman, G. A., 1941: Hybrids of the American papaw. J. Hered. 32, 83–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gottsberger, G. (1977). Some Aspects of Beetle Pollination in the Evolution of Flowering Plants. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution / Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen, vol 1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7076-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-81434-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7076-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive