Advertisement

On the Taxonomic Significance of Secondary Metabolites in Angiosperms

  • A. Cronquist
Part of the Plant Systematics and Evolution / Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen book series (SYSTEMATICS, volume 1)

Abstract

I here put forward the speculative interpretation that changes in the major groups of chemical repellents had an important role in the rise of major new groups of dicotyledons. Each set of repellents tends to lose its effectiveness as insects and other predators become resistant to it. A new kind of repellent gives the plants a competitive advantage and permits the evolutionary expansion of a new group. Thus the isoquinoline alkaloids of the Magnoliidae gave way to the tannins of the Hamamelidae, Rosidae and Dilleniidae, and these in turn gave way to the iridoid compounds that were most effectively exploited by the Asteridae. Within the Asteridae, the rise of the relatively recent family Asteraceae may relate to a shift to polyacetylenes and sesquiterpene lactones in place of the already less effective iridoids. The pattern is blurred by the continued evolutionary experimentation with new repellents by each major taxonomic group, and by the exploitation of the same new group of repellents by different taxa at about the same time.

Keywords

Late Cretaceous Shikimic Acid Sesquiterpene Lactone Major Taxon Taxonomic Significance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alston, R., 1967: Biochemical systematics. In: Evolutionary biology (Dobzhansky, T. S., Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C., eds.), Vol. 1, 97–305. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers, W. S., Ohta, T., Cleere, J.S., and Marsella, P.A., 1976: Discovery of insect anti-juvenile hormones in plants. Science 193, 542–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cronquist, A., 1973: Chemical plant taxonomy: A generalist’s view of a promising specialty. Nobel Symposium 25, 29–39.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlgren, R., 1975: A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Notis. 128, 119–147.Google Scholar
  5. Dobzhansky, T. S., 1941: Genetics and the origin of species. 2nd. ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Doyle, J. A., 1973: Fossil evidence on early evolution of the monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol. 48, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doyle, J. A.and Hickey, L. J., 1976: Pollen and leaves from the Mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. In: Origin and early evolution of angiosperms (Beck, C. B., ed.), 139–206. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eckardt, T., 1976: Classical morphological features of centrospermous families. Plant Syst. Evol. 126, 5–25.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrlich, P. R., and Raven, P. H., 1965: Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraenkel, G. S., 1959: The raison d’être of secondary plant substances. Science 129, 1466–1470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giannasi, D.E., 1975: The flavonoid systematics of the genus Dahlia (Compositae). Mem. N.Y. Bot. Gard. 26 (2), 1–125.Google Scholar
  12. Hegnauer, R., 1971: Chemical patterns and relationships of the Umbelliferae. In: The biology and chemistry of the Umbelliferae (Heywood, V. H., ed.), 267–277. Suppl. 1 to Vol. 64, Bot. J. Linnean Soc.Google Scholar
  13. Hickey, L. J., and Wolfe, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62, 538–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janzen, D.H., 1975: Ecology of plants in the tropics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen, S. R., Nielsen, B. J., and Dahlgren, R., 1975: Iridoid compounds, their occurrence and systematic importance in the angiosperms. Bot. Notis. 128, 148–180.Google Scholar
  16. Kimler, L., 1975: Betanin, the red beet pigment, as an antifungal agent. Bot. Soc. Amer. Abstr. 36.Google Scholar
  17. Kubitzki, K., 1969: Chemosystematische Betrachtungen zur Großgliederung der Dicotylen. Taxon 18, 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kubitzki, K., 1973: Probleme der Großsystematik der Blütenpflanzen. Ber. dtsch. bot, Ges. 85, 259–277 (1972).Google Scholar
  19. Levin, D. A., 1976: The chemical defenses of plants to pathogens and herbivores. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 121–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mabry, T. J., 1973: Is the order Centrospermae monophyletic? Chemistry in Botanical Classification. Nobel Symposium 25, 275–285.Google Scholar
  21. Mabry, T. J., 1976: Pigment dichotomy and DNA-RNA hybridization data for centrospermous families. Plant Syst. Evol. 126, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mabry, T. J., and Turner, B. L., 1964: Chemical investigations of the Batidaceae. Betaxanthins and their systematic implications. Taxon 13, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muller, J., 1970: Palynological evidence on early differentiation of angiosperms. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45, 417–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niklas, K., and Gensel, P. G., 1976: Chemotaxonomy of some paleozoic vascular plants. Part I. Chemical compositions and preliminary cluster analyses. Brittonia 28, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raven, P. H., and Axelrod, D.I., 1974: Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61, 539–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stebbins, G. L., 1965: The probable growth habit of the earliest flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 52, 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker, J. W., 1976: Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the Ranalean complex. In: Origin and early evolution of angiosperms (Beck, C. B., ed.), 241–299. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Walker, J. W.and Doyle, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62, 664–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cronquist
    • 1
  1. 1.New York Botanical GardenBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations