Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

  • R. Braakman
Part of the Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery book series (NEUROSURGERY, volume 6)


Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most common disease of the spinal cord after the age of 40. There have been many publications advocating various types of surgical treatment, and their results, on the basis of relatively small and selected series of patients with spondylotic myelopathy. Opinions about the preferable approach vary. There is not as yet full knowledge regarding the pathomechanism of the disease and the factors governing its natural course. However, it is clear that mechanical factors play an important role. This means that most surgical therapies have a mechanical basis. These surgical approaches are on the whole not difficult technically; the main problem is the best choice for each individual patient.


Cervical Spine Vertebral Body Spinal Canal Interbody Fusion Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aboulker, J., David, M., Engel, P., Ballivet, J., 1965: Les myélopathies cervicales d’origine rachidienne. Neurochirurgie 11, 87–198.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C., 1976: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 26, 97–112.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, C. B. T., Logue, V., 1971: Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. I. Movement of the cervical root, dura and cord, and their relation to the course of the extrathecal roots. Brain 94, 557–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, C. B. T., Logue, V., 1971: Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. II. The movement and contour of the spine in relation to the neural complications of cervical spondylosis. Brain 94, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams, C. B. T., Logue, V., 1971: Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. III. Some functional effects of operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Brain 94, 587–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexander, E., Davis, C. H., Field, Ch., 1958: Hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine. Arch. Neurol. Psych. 79, 146–150.Google Scholar
  7. Arnold, J. G., 1955: Clinical manifestations of spondylochondrosis (spondylosis) of the cervical spine. Ann. Surg. 141, 872–889.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakay, L., 1973: Postoperative myelography in spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Acta neurochir. (Wien) 28, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishara, S. N., 1971: The posterior operations in treatment of cervical spondylosis with myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 34, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bohlman, H. H., 1977: Cervical spondylosis with moderate to severe myelopathy. A report of seventeen cases treated by Robinson anterior cervical disectomy and fusion. Spine 2, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boysen, E., 1954: The cervical spinal canal in intraspinal expansive processes. Acta radiol. 42, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braakman, R., Penning, L., 1971: Injuries of the cervical spine. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Bradshaw, P., 1957: Some aspects of cervical spondylosis. Quart. J. Med. 26, 177–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brain, W. R., Northfield, D., Wilkinson, M., 1952: Neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 75, 187–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brain, W. R., Wilkinson, M., 1957: The association of cervical spondylosis and disseminated sclerosis. Brain 80, 456–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brain, W. R., Wilkinson, M., 1967: Cervical spondylosis and other disorders of the cervical spine. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  17. Breig, A., 1960: Biomechanics of the central nervous system. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  18. Breig, A., El-Nadi, A. F., 1966: Biomechanics of the cervical cord. Relief of contact pressure on and overstretching of the spinal cord. Acta radiol. 4, 602–624.Google Scholar
  19. Breig, A., Turnbull, I., Hassler, 0., 1966: Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaver material. J. Neurosurg. 25, 45–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brooker, A. E. W., Barter, R. W., 1965: Cervical spondylosis: a clinical study with comparative radiology. Brain 88, 925–936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burrows, E. H., 1963: The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. Clin. Radiol. 14, 77–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarke, E., Robinson, P. K., 1956: Cervical myelopathy, a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain 79, 483–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cloward, R. B., 1958: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J. Neurosurg. 15, 602–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cloward, R. B., 1963: Lesions of the intervertebral discs and their treatment by interbody fusion methods. The painful disk. Clin. Orthop. 27, 51–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Colambert, P., Pellet, W., 1971: Indications thérapeutiques et résultats opératoires obtenus dans une série de quatre vingts myélopathies par cervicarthrose. Sem. Hop. Paris 47, 950–952.Google Scholar
  26. Concha, S., Mcqueen, J. D., 1977: Anterior cervical fusions for spondylotic myelopathy. A preliminary report. Spine 2, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crandall, P. H., Hanafee, W. N., 1964: Cervical spondylotic ryelopathy studied by air myelography. Amer. J. Roentgen. 92, 1260–1269.Google Scholar
  28. Crandall, P. H., Gregorius, F. K., 1977: Long-term follow-up of surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crandall, P. H., Batzdorf, U., 1966: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. 25, 57–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dereymaeker, A., Ghosez, J. P., Henkes, R., 1963: Le traitement chirurgicale de la discopathie cervicale; résultats comparés de l’abord postérieure et de l’abord ventrale dans une cinquantaine de cas personels. Neurochirurgie 9, 13–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Epstein, J. A., Carras, R., Lavine, L. S., Epstein, B. S., 1969: The importance of removing osteophytes as part of the surgical treatment of myeloradiculopathy. J. Neurosurg. 30, 219–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Epstein, J. A., Epstein, B. S., Lavine, L. S., 1963: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The syndrome of the narrow canal treated by laminectomy, foraminotomy and removal of the osteophytes. Arch. neurol. 8, 307–317.Google Scholar
  33. Fager, C. A., 1973: Results of adequate posterior decompression in the relief of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. 38, 684–693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedenberg, Z. B., Miller, W. T., 1963: Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 45 A, 1171–1178.Google Scholar
  35. Galera, R., Tovi, D., 1968: Anterior disc excision with interbody fusion in cervical spondylotic myelopathy or rhizopathy. J. Neurosurg. 28, 305–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gillilan, L. A., 1970: Veins of the spinal cord. Neurology 20, 860–867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gonzalez-Feria, L., 1975: The effect of surgical immobilization after laminectomy in the treatment of advanced cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta neurochir. (Wien) 31, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gonzalez-Feria, L., Peraita-Peraita, P., 1975: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a cooperative study. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 1, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gooding, M. R., 1974: Pathogenesis of myelopathy in cervical spondylosis. Lancet II, 1180–1181.Google Scholar
  40. Gorter, K., 1974: Invloed van laminectomie op het beloop van de cervicale myelopathie. Thesis. van Denderen, Groningen.Google Scholar
  41. Grote, W., Bettag, W., Wüllenweber, R., 1970: Technik und Ergebnisse zervikaler Fusionen. Acta neurochir. (Wien) 22, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guidetti, B., Fortuna, A., 1969: Longterm results of surgical treatment of myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis. J. Neurosurg. 30, 714–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heinz, E. R., Goldman, R. L., 1972: The role of gas myelography in neuroradiologic diagnosis. Radiology 102, 629–634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hinck, V. C., Sachdev, N. S., 1966: Development stenosis of the cervical spinal canal. Brain 89, 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoff, J., Nishimura, M., Pitts, L., Vilnis, V., Tuerk, K., Lagger, R., 1977: The role of ischaemia on the pathogenesis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holt, E. P., 1964: Fallacy of cervical discography. Report of 50 cases in normal subjects. J. A. M. A. 188, 799–801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hughes, J. T., 1966: Pathology of the spinal cord. London: Lloyd Luke.Google Scholar
  48. Jung, A., Kehr, P., 1974: Anterolateral cervical operations using the direct lesional approach. The Cervical Spine, Primary and posttraumatic disorders; Advances in surgical management, pp. 133–146. Bern: H. Huber.Google Scholar
  49. Kahn, E. A., 1947: The role of the dentate ligaments in spinal cord compression and the syndrome of lateral sclerosis. J. Neurosurg. 4, 191–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaplan, L., Kennedy, F., 1950: Effect of head posture on manometrics of cerebrospinal fluid in cervical lesions. Brain 73, 337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kempe, L. G., 1970: Operative neurosurgery, Vol. II. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Lakke, J. P. W. F., 1969: Queckenstedt’s test. Thesis, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  53. Lees, F., Turner, J. W., 1963: Prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Brit, Med, J. 2, 1607–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mair, W. G. P., Druckmann, R., 1953: The pathology of spinal cord lesions and their relation to clinical features in protrusions of the cervical intervertebral disc. Brain 76, 70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mayfield, F. H., 1955: Neurosurgical aspect of cervical trauma. Clinical Neurosurgery, Vol. II. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  56. Murone, I., 1974: The importance of the sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal in relation to spondylosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 56B, 30–36.Google Scholar
  57. Nugent, G. R., 1959: Clinicopathologic correlations in cervical spondylosis. Neurology 9, 273–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Nurick, S., 1972: The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95, 87–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nurick, S., 1972: The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorders associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95, 101–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nordqvist, L., 1965: The sagittal diameter of the spinal cord and subarachnoid space in different age groups. Acta radiol. (suppl. 227 ), 1–96.Google Scholar
  61. Ono, K., Ota, H., Tada, K., Hamada, H., Takao, K., 1977: Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: a clinicopathologic study. Spine 2, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Palleske, H., 1969: Experimental investigations on the regulations of the spinal cord circulation. Acta neurochir. (Wien) 21, 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pallis, C., Jones, A. M., Spillane, J. D., 1954: Cervical spondylosis: Incidence and implications. Brain 77, 274–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Payne, E. E., Spillane, J. D., 1957: The cervical spine: an anatomical study of 70 pecimens with special reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brains 80, 571–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Penning, L., 1962: Some aspects of plain radiography of the cervical spine in chronic myelopathy. Neurology 12, 513–519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Penning, L., 1968: Functional pathology of the cervical spine. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation.Google Scholar
  67. Penning, L., Van der Zwaag, P., 1964: Biomechanical aspects of spondylotic myelopathy. Acta radiol. 5, 1090–1103.Google Scholar
  68. Pertuiset, B., Fohanno, D., Caen, O. L., 1978: Recurrent instability of the cervical spine with neurological implications—Treatment by anterior spinal fusion. Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, Vol. 5, pp. 175–211. Wien-New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Reid, J. D., 1960: Ascending nerve roots and tightness of dura mater. a) Ascending nerve roots. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 23, 148–155. b) Effects of flexion-extension movements of the head and spine upon the spinal cord and nerve roots. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 23, 214–221.Google Scholar
  70. Robinson, R. A., Afeiche, N., Dunn, E. J., Northrup, B. E., 1977: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Etiology and treatment concepts. Spine 2, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson, R. A., Smith, G. W., 1955: Anterolateral disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 96, 223–224.Google Scholar
  72. Robinson, R. A., Walker, A. E., Ferlic, D. C., Wiecking, D. K., 1962: The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 44 A, 1569–1587.Google Scholar
  73. Rogers, L., 1961: The treatment of cervical myelopathy by mobilisation of the cervicalcord into an enlarged spinal canal. J. Neurosurg. 18, 490–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosomoff, H. L., Rossrnan, F., 1966: Treatment of cervical spondylosis by anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Archs. neurol. (Chicago) 14, 392— 398.Google Scholar
  75. Scoville, W. B., 1961: Cervical spondylosis treated by bilateral facetectomy and laminectomy. J. Neurosurg. 18, 423–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schneider, R. C., 1969: Trauma to the spine and the spinal cord. In: Correlative neurosurgery. Springfield, III.: Ch. C Thomas.Google Scholar
  77. Shimomura, Y., Hukuda, S., 1968: Experimental study of ischemic damage of the cervical spinal cord. J. Neurosurg. 18, 565–573.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, G. W., Robinson, R. A., 1958: The treatment of certain cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 40 A, 607–624.Google Scholar
  79. Stoltman, H. F., Blackwood, W., 1964: The role of the ligamenta flava in the pathogenesis of myelopathy in cervical spondylosis. Brain 87, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stoltman, H. F., Blackwood, W., 1966: An anatomical study of the role of the dentate ligaments in the cervical spinal canal. J. Neurosurg. 24, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stoops, W. L., King, R. B., 1965: Chronic myelopathy associated with cervical spondylosis—its response to laminectomy and foraminotomy. J. A. M. A. 192, 281–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Symon, L., Lavender, P., 1967: The surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurology (Minneapolis) 17, 117–127.Google Scholar
  83. Symonds, C., 1953: Interrelation of trauma and cervical spondylosis in compression of the spinal cord. Lancet 1, 457–460.Google Scholar
  84. Taylor, A. R., 1953: Mechanism and treatment of spinal cord disorders associated with cervical spondylosis. Lancet I, 717–720.Google Scholar
  85. Taylor, A. R., 1964: Vascular factors in the myelopathy associated with cervical spondylosis. Neurology 14, 62–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Teng, P., 1960: Spondylosis of the cervical spine with compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 42A, 392–407.Google Scholar
  87. Töndury, G., 1974: Morphology of the cervical spine. The Cervical Spine, Primary and posttraumatic disorders; Advances in surgical management, pp. 14–36. Bern: Hans Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
  88. Tönnis, D., 1961: Über die ischämische Entstehung von Spastik bei traumatischer Rückenmarkschädigungen. Fortschr. Neurol. Psych. 26, 445.Google Scholar
  89. Verbiest, H., 1970: La chirurgie antérieure et latérale du rachis cervical. Neurochirurgie 16, 1–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Verbiest, H., 1972: The management of cervical spondylosis. Clin. Neurosurg. 20, 262–294.Google Scholar
  91. Verbiest, H., 1972: The lateral approach to the cervical spine. Clin. Neurosurg. 20, 295–306.Google Scholar
  92. Verbiest, H., 1977: Personal contributions to the surgery of the anterior and lateral portions of the cervical spine by means of an anterolateral approach. Paper presented at the Dutch “Neurochirurgische Studieclub”.Google Scholar
  93. Verbiest, H., Paz-y-Geuze, H. D., 1966: Anterolateral surgery for cervical spondylosis in cases of myelopathy or nerve compression. J. Neurosurg. 25, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wilkinson, M., 1960: The morbid anatomy of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Brain 83, 589–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilkinson, H. A., Le May, M. L., Ferris, E. J., 1969: Clinical-radiographic correlations in cervical spondylosis. J. Neurosurg. 30, 213–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wolf, B. S., Khilnani, M., Malis, L., 1956: The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J. Mt. Sinai Hosp. 23, 283–292.Google Scholar
  97. Zülch, K. J., 1954: Mangeldurchblutung an der Grenzzone zweier Gefäßgebiete als Ursache bisher ungeklärter Rückenmarksschädigungen. Dtsch. Z. Nervenheilk. 172, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Braakman
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurosurgical DepartmentAcademic Hospital Dijkzigt, Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations