Advertisement

Pain pp 80-81 | Cite as

Spinal Infusion of Opiates and Somatostatin

  • Joachim Chrubasik
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 38)

Abstract

Since the introduction in 1979 of spinal (epidural/intrathecal) administration of opiates in pain treatment, spinal bolus injections have been investigated and employed more and more. Yet, more recent studies have shown that intermittent bolus injections should be replaced when possible by continuous, on-demand spinal infusions by means of externally worn or implantable infusion devices in treatment of acute1 and chronic2 pain. Because of the possibility of individualized treatment of pain, continuous-plus-on- demand epidural infusion of opiates is particularly recommendable in treatment of postoperative pain3, especially when the catheter has been placed for epidural anaesthesia. Pharmacokinetic4 and animal5 investigations have proved that the risk of side-effects is lower with continuous-plus-on-demand epidural infusion than with intermittent bolus epidural injections. A reduction of the injection volume does not result in any loss of analgesic efficacy6. The advantages of continuous, on-demand spinal infusions of opiates include constant analgesia, individualized pain treatment, convenience for patient and staff, and a lower risk of catheter complications.

Keywords

Pain Treatment Epidural Morphine Epidural Infusion Infusion Device Gastric Mucosal Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Chrubasik J (1984) Epidural, on-demand, low-dose morphine infusion for postoperative pain. Lancet I: 107 - 108Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chrubasik J, Scholler KL, Wiemers K, Weigel K, Friedrich G (1984) Low-dose infusion of morphine prevents respiratory depression. Lancet I: 738 - 739Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chrubasik J, Wiemers K (1985) Continuous-plus-on-demand epidural infusion of morphine for postoperative pain relief by means of a small, externally worn infusion device. Anesthesiology 62: 263 - 267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chrubasik J, Vogel W, Friedrich G (1984) Morphinmetabo¬lismus im Serum unter bedarfsgesteuerter periduraler Mor¬phininfusion. Anaesth Intensivther Notfallmed 19: 231 - 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chrubasik J, Scholler KL, Wiemers K, Friedrich G, Weigel K, Roth H, Berg G (1985) Zum Einfluß des Volumens periduraler Morphininjektionen auf die Morphinkonzentration in der Zisterna magna des Hundes. Anaesthesist 34: 304 - 308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chrubasik J, Wiemers K (1985) Kein analgetischer Wirkverlust durch peridurale “Low-Volume”-Morphingabe. Anaesth Intensivther Notfallmed 20: 19 - 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chrubasik J, Volk B, Wetterauer U, Trötschler H (1985) Externe Opiat-Dosiergeräte bei unerträglichen Krebsschmerzen. Z Allg Med 61: 17 - 21Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Penn RD, Paice JA, Gottschalk W, Ivankovich AD (1984) Cancer pain relief using chronic morphine infusion. J Neurosurg 61: 302 - 306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chrubasik J, Meynadier J, Blond S, Scherpereel P, Ackerman A, Weinstock M, Bonath K, Cramer H, Wünsch E (1984) Somatostatin, a potent analgesic. Lancet II: 1208 - 1209Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ackerman E, Chrubasik J, Weinstock M, Wünsch E (1985) Effect of intrathecal somatostatin on pain threshold in rats. Schmerz/Pain/Douleur 6: 41 - 42Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chrubasik J, Meynadier J, Scherpereel P (1985) Somatostatin versus morphine in epidural after abdominal operations. An-esthesiology 63 [Suppl] 3: 237Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chrubasik J, Meynadier J, Scherpereel P, Wünsch E (1985) The effect of epidural somatostatin on postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 64: 1085 - 1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meynadier J, Chrubasik J,\Dubar M, Wünsch E (1985) Intra¬thecal somatostatin in two terminally ill patients. Pain 23: 9 - 12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chrubasik J, Bonath K, Cramer H, Rissler K, Wünsch E (1986) Permeability of epidural somatostatin and morphine into the intrathecal space of dogs. Regulatory Peptides 13: 119 - 124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carli P, Ecoffey C, Chrubasik J, Benlabed M, Gross JB, Samii K (1986) Spread of analgesia and ventilatory response to C02 following epidural somatostatin. Anesthesiology 65 [Suppl] 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chrubasik J, Magora F, Veit S, Tajfel P, Davidson JT (1986) Efficacy of epidural somatostatin during transurethral opera¬tions in the conscious patient. Newsletter (Israel) [Suppl] 117Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reubi JC, Cortes R, Maurer R, Probst A (1986) Distribution of somatostatin receptors in the human brain: an autoradiographic study. Neuroscience 18: 329 - 346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chrubasik J, Meynadier J, Beaucair J, Scherpereel P, Magora F, Davidson JT, Wünsch E (1985) Zur intraoperativen Anwendung von Somatostatin. Anaesth Intensivther Notfallmed 20: 139 - 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chrubasik J, Meynadier J, Scherpereel P, Wünsch E (1985) Somatostatin for anaesthesia. Newsletter (Israel) 6 - 8Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maxwell DL, Nolop KB, Hughes JMN (1986) Effects of somatostatin, naloxone and perchlorperazine on the control of ventilation in man. Clinical Science 70: 547 - 554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moyer DL, Armstrong A, Aust JB, Levine BA, Sirinek KR (1986) Effects of gastrin, glutamine, and somatostatin on the in vitro growth of normal and malignant human gastric mucosal cells. Arch Surg 121: 285 - 288PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Chrubasik
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für Anästhesie der UniversitätsklinikDüsseldorfFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations