Advertisement

A Model of Stuttering and the Production of Speech under Delayed Auditory Feedback Conditions

  • Jonathan Harrington

Abstract

The models of stuttering and speech produced under delayed auditory feedback conditions to be discussed in this chapter are based on some recent theories of linguistic rhythm (Martin, 1972; Shields, McHugh & Martin, 1974; Fowler, 1983). If, as has been suggested (Abercrombie, 1967; Donovan & Darwin, 1979), the perception of speech is rhythmic, a speaker must presumably control the intervals between the units of the rhythmic structure the listener perceives; in a stress timed language, such as English, these units are considered to be coincident with stressed syllables (Abercrombie, 1967). At the same time, suppose a listener is able to hypothesize the rhythmic structure intended by the speaker, based on his current perception of the relative time at which the units of the rhythmic structure occur in the speaker’s utterance; in this case, the listener should be able to predict when future units of the rhythmic structure (i.e. stressed syllable in English) will be perceived (Shields, McHugh and Martin, 1974). The relationship between the units of a rhythmic structure encoded as part of the speech production plan and the listener’s prediction of the time of occurrence of future units is fundamental to the model of delayed auditory feedback discussed below.

Keywords

Speech Production Auditory Feedback Auditory Perception Stressed Syllable Rhythmic Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, G.D. (1972). The location of rhythmic stress beats in English: an experimental study I. Language and Speech, 15, 72–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, J.W. (1951). The effect of delayed sidetone upon vocal rate and intensity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16, 56–60.Google Scholar
  4. Cherry, C. & Sayers, B. (1956). Experiments upon the total inhibition of stammering by external controls and some clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1, 233–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conture, E. (1974). Some effects of noise on the speaking behavior of stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 661–668.Google Scholar
  6. Donovan, A. & Darwin, C. (1979). The perceived rhythm of speech. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2, 268–274.Google Scholar
  7. Fairbanks, G. (1955). Selective vocal effects of delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 20, 333–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowler, C.A. (1980). Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113–133.Google Scholar
  9. Fowler, C.A. (1983). Converging sources of evidence on spoken and perceived rhythms of speech: cyclic productions of vowels in monosyllabic stress feet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112 (3), 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldiamond, I. (1965). Stuttering and fluency as manipulatable operant response classes. In L. Krasner & L.P. Ullman (Eds.), Research in Behavior Modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  11. Harrington, J. (1987). Coarticulation and stuttering: an acoustic and electropalatographic study. In H.F.M. Peters & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech Motor Dynamics in Stuttering. Wien: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Huggins, A. (1972). On the perception of temporal phenomena in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51 (4), 1279–1290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, J. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review, 79, 487–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morton, J., Marcus, S. & Frankish, C. (1976). Perceptual centers. Psychological Review, 83 (5), 405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shields, J.L., McHugh, A. & Martin, J.G. (1974). Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 250–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Spilka, B. (1954). Some vocal effects of different reading passages and time delays in speech feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 19, 37–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tuller, B. & Fowler, C.A. (1980). Some articulatory correlates of perceptual isochrony. Perception and Psychophysics, 27 (4), 277–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Riper, C. (1982). The Nature of Stuttering. (2nd edition) New Jersey; Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Von Lotzmann, G. (1961). Zur Anwendung variierter Verzoegerungszeiten bei Balbuties. Folia Phoniatrica, 13, 276–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wingate, M.E. (1977). Immediate source of stuttering. In R.W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The Problem of Stuttering: Theory and Therapy. New York: Elsevier, North Holland Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Harrington

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations