Perceptual and Acoustic Evaluation of Stuttering Therapy

  • Marie Christine Franken


Formal evaluations of the results of speech therapies are not carried out very often. Stuttering therapies form no exception to this rule. In general, such evaluations can have two goals, viz. to assess the results of a therapy for a given (group of) subject(s) after a certain amount of treatment time, or the identification of weaknesses in the therapy program. The lack of formal evaluations of speech therapies is at least in part due to the fact that few treatment techniques have been sufficiently refined so that a standardized form of treatment can be evaluated and a systematic feedback from evaluation to therapy becomes possible. Yet, there is a real and increasing need for formalized evaluations of speech therapies, if only to reduce the economic and emotional costs of ineffective therapies.


Acoustic Measurement Speech Therapy Speech Quality Spectral Slope Speech Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asendorpf, J. & Wallbott, H.G. (1979). Masse der Beobachterubereinstimmung: ein systematischer Vergleich. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 10, 243–252.Google Scholar
  2. Boves, L. (1984). The phonetic basis of perceptual ratings of running speech. Dordrecht-Holland/Cinnaminson-U.S.A.: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Fagel, W., Van Herpt, L. & Boves, L. (1983). Analysis of the perceptual qualities of Dutch speakers’ voice and pronunciation. Speech Communication, 2, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hammarberg, B., Fritzell, B.., Gauffin, J., Sundberg, J. & Wedin, L. (1980). Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice quality. Acta Otolaryng., 90, 441–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ingham, R.J. (1984). Stuttering and behavior therapy. San Diego, California: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ingham, R.J., Gow, W. & Costello, J.M. (1985a). Stuttering and speech naturalness: some additional data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 217–219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ingham, R.J. & Onslow, M. (1985a). Measurement and modification of speech naturalness during stuttering therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 261–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin, R.R., Haroldson, K.H. & Triden, K.A. (1984). Stuttering and speech naturalness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 53–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J. & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  10. Peters, H.F.M. & Kooiman, P.G. (1982). Systematische spraakreconstructie voor stotteraars. Nijmegen: Associatie systematische spraakreconstructie voor stotteraars.Google Scholar
  11. Speech Foundation of America (1960). On stuttering and its treatment. Publication No. 1, Memphis.Google Scholar
  12. Webster, R.L. (1974). The Precision Fluency Shaping Program: speech reconstruction for stutterers. Roanoke, Virginia: Communications Development Corporation, Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Webster, R.L. (1978). Precision Fluency Shaping Program: clinician’s program guide. Roanoke, Virginia: CommunicationsDevelopment Corporation, Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Christine Franken

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations