Labial and Laryngeal Reaction Times of Stutterers and Nonstutterers

  • Klaas Bakker
  • Gene J. Brutten


Simple reaction time experiments, in which speech-motor capacities of stutterers and nonstutterers were compared, most often have tested laryngeal functioning. In these studies subjects were required to phonate, as quickly as possible, when a cuestimulus was presented. The results have tended to indicate that stutterers respond more slowly than do nonstutterers. This was true even though only fluent responses were analyzed to ensure that the results would not be contaminated by the presence of stuttering (Adams and Hayden, 1976; Cross and Luper, 1983; Prosek, 1978; Starkweather, Hirschman, and Tannenbaum, 1976; Watson and Alfonso, 1983).


Auditory Stimulus Stimulus Modality Voice Onset Time Hearing Research Reaction Time Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, M. R. & Hayden, P.A. (1976). The ability of stutterers and nonstutterers to initiate and terminate phonation during production of an isolated vowel. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19, 290–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnello, J. G. (1975). Voice onset and voice termination features of stutterers. In Webster, L.M. & Furst, L.C. (Eds.), Vocal Tract Dynamics and Dysfluency. New York: Speech and Hearing Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Cross, D.E. & Luper, H.L. (1978). Voice reaction time of stuttering and onstuttering children and adults. ASHA, 20, 826.Google Scholar
  4. Cross, D.E. & Luper, H.L. (1983). Relation between finger reaction times and voice reaction time in stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 356–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McFarlane, S.C. & Prins, D. (1979). Neural response time of stutterers and nonstutterers in selected oral reading tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 768–778.Google Scholar
  6. McFarlane, S.C. & Shipley, K.G. (1978). Visual and auditory cueing effects on vocalization onset for stutterers and nonstutterers. ASHA, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. Prosek, R.A. (1978). Acoustic and laryngeal reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers. (abstract) ASHA, 20, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  8. Starkweather, C.W., Hirschman, P. & Tannenbaum, R.S. (1976). Latency of vocalization onset: Stutterers versus nonstutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19, 481–492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Watson, B.C. & Alfonso, P.J. (1983). Foreperiod and stuttering severity effects on acoustic laryngeal reaction time. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 8, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaas Bakker
  • Gene J. Brutten

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations