Advertisement

A summary of potyvirus taxonomy and definitions

  • O. W. Barnett
Part of the Archives of Virology book series (ARCHIVES SUPPL, volume 5)

Summary

The current taxonomie status of the family Potyviridae is presented pathotype with suggestions for resolving some taxonomic problems. Terms such as strain, pathotype, serotype, variant, mutant, and isolate are dtscussed in relatton to the family.

Keywords

Mosaic Virus Coat Protein Potato Virus Virus Species Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barnett OW (1991) Potyviridae, a proposed family of plant viruses. Arch Virol 118: 139–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger PH (1992) The usefulness of aphid transmission as a taxonomie criterion for potyviruses. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 251–255 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bos L (1992) Potyviruses, chaos or order? In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 31–46 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunt AA (1992) The general properties of potyviruses. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 3–16 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dijkstra J, Kahn JA (1992) A proposal for a bean common mosaic subgroup of potyviruses. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 389–395(Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldbach R (1992) The recombinative nature of potyviruses: implications for setting up a true phylogenetic taxonomy. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 299–304 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hampton RO, Provvidenti R (1992) Specific infectivity and host resistance have predicated potyviral and pathotype nomenclature but relate less to taxonomy. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 183–187 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hiebert E, Purcifull DE (1992) A comparison of pepper mottle virus with potato virus Y and evidence for their distinction. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 321–326 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jensen SG (1992) A viewpoint on the taxonomy of potyviruses infecting sugarcane, maize, and sorghum. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 349–351 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jordan R (1992) Potyviruses, monoclonal antibodies and antigenic sites. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 81–95 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lecoq H, Purcifull DE (1992) Biological variability of potyviruses, an example, zucchini yellow mosaic virus. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 229–234 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lovisolo O (1992) Ecology and taxonomy of some European potyviruses. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 311–316 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leseman D-E, Shukla DD, Tosic M, Huth W (1992) Differentiation of the four viruses of the sugarcane mosaic virus subgroup based on cytopathology. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 353–361 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mink GI, Silbernagel MJ (1992) Serological and biological relationships among viruses in the bean common mosaic virus subgroup. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 397–406 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohki ST (1992) A potyvirus in nature: indistinct populations. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 217–219 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richter J (1992) Polyclonal reference antisera may be useful for the differentiation of potyvirus species. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 71–74 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rybicki EP, Shukla DD (1992) Coat protein phylogeny and systematics of potyviruses. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 139–170 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shukla DD, Frenkel MJ, McKern NM, Ward CW, Jilka J, Tosic M, Ford RE (1992) Present status of the sugarcane mosaic subgroup of potyviruses. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 363–373 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uyeda I (1992) Bean yellow mosaic virus subgroup: search for the group specific sequences in the 3’ terminal region of the genome. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 377–385 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van der Vlugt R (1992) Is pepper mottle virus a strain of potato virus Y? In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 327–335 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Regenmortel MHV (1992) What is a virus? In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus tax-onomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 47–53 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vance VB, Jordan R, Edwardson JR, Christie R, Purcifull DE, Turpen T, Falk B (1992) Evidence that pepper mottle virus and potato virus Y are distinct viruses: analyses of the coat protein and 3’ untranslated sequences of a California isolate of pepper mottle virus. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 337–345 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ward CW, McKern NM, Frenkel MJ, Shukla DD (1992) Sequence data as the major criterion for potyvirus classification. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 283–297 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vetten HJ, Lesemann D-E, Maiss E (1992) Serotype A and B strains of bean common mosaic virus are two distinct potyviruses. In: Barnett OW (ed) Potyvirus taxonomy. Springer, Wien New York, pp 415–431 (Arch Virol [Suppl] 5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. W. Barnett
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology and PhysiologyClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant Pathology and PhysiologyClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations