Skip to main content

Specific infectivity and host resistance have predicated potyviral and pathotype nomenclature but relate less to taxonomy

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Archives of Virology ((ARCHIVES SUPPL,volume 5))

Summary

The names of potyviruses and viral-strains have represented the occurrence of predominant pathotypes on predominant crop genotypes. Thus virus nomenclature, but not viral taxonomy, has been decisively influenced by plant-genotype susceptibility and indirectly by host genetic resistance. Resistance to infection (i.e., host range) continues to serve a practical role in differentiating recognized viruses. Plant genes that confer disease tolerance or viral resistance remain a principal means of viral pathotype differentiation, as well as a principal control measure against major viral pathogens. Degrees of genetic diversity among isolates of recognized viruses should not be underestimated, and any system of viral taxonomy should be prepared for flexibility at the species level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aapola A A, Knesek JE, Mink GI (1974) The influence of inoculation procedure on the host range of pea seedborne mosaic virus. Phytopathology 64: 1003–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alconero R, Provvidenti R, Gonsalves D (1986) Three pea seedborne mosaic virus pathotypes from pea and lentil germ plasm. Plant Dis 70: 783–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buzzell RI, Tu JC (1989) Inheritance of a soybean stem-tip necrosis reaction to soybean mosaic virus. J Hered 80: 400–401.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dickson MH, Natti JJ (1968) Inheritance of resistance of Phaseolus vulgaris to bean yellow mosaic virus. Phytopathology 58: 1450.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drijfhout E (1978) Genetic interaction between Phaseolus vulgaris and bean common mosaic virus with implications for strain identification and breeding for resistance (PhD Thesis). Agric Res Rep 872, IPO, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodell JJ, Hampton RO (1984) Ecological characteristics of the lentil strain of pea seedborne mosaic virus. Plant Dis 68: 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hagedorn DJ, Gritton ET (1973) Inheritance of resistance to pea seed-borne mosaic virus. Phytopathology 63: 1130–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hampton RO (1967) Natural spread of viruses infectious to bean. Phytopathology 57: 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hampton RO (1974) Natural spread of Oregon necrotic strains of bean yellow mosaic virus. Proc Am Phytopathol Soc 1: 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hampton RO, Mink GI, Hamilton RI, Kraft JM, Muehlbauer FJ (1976) Occurrence of pea seedborne mosaic virus in North American breeding lines and procedures for its elimination. Plant Dis 60: 455–459.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hampton RO (1982) Incidence of the lentil strain of pea seedborne mosaic virus as a contaminant of Lens culinaris germplasm. Phytopathology 72: 695–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampton RO, Silbernagel MJ, Burke DW (1983) Bean common mosaic virus strains associated with bean mosaic epidemics in the northwestern United States. Plant Dis 67: 658–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Inouye T (1967) A seed-borne mosaic virus of pea (in Japanese). Phytopathol Soc Jpn 33: 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan RL, Hammond J (1991) Comparison and differentiation of potyvirus isolates and identification of strain-, virus-, subgroup-specific, and potyvirus group-common epitopes using monoclonal antibodies. J Gen Virol 72: 25–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiihl RAS, Hartwig EE (1979) Inheritance of reaction to soybean mosaic virus in soybean cultivars. Crop Sci 19: 372–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLaughlin MR, Boykin DL (1988) Virus diseases of seven species of forage legumes in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis 72: 539–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McLaughlin MR, Ensign RD (1989) Viruses detected in forage legumes in Idaho. Plant Dis 73: 906–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Musil M (1966) Über das Vorkommen des Virus des Blattrollens der Erbse in der Slowakei. Biologia Bratislava 21: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patel PN, Mligo JK, Leyna HK, Kuwite C, Mmbaga ET (1982) Sources of resistance, inheritance, and breeding of cowpeas for resistance to a strain of cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus from Tanzania. Indian J Genet 42: 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pratt MJ (1969) Clover yellow vein virus in North America. Plant Dis Rep 53: 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Provvidenti R, Schroeder WT (1973) Resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris to the severe strain of bean yellow mosaic virus. Phytopathology 63: 196–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Provvidenti R (1987) Inheritance of resistance to clover yellow vein virus in Pisum sativum. J Hered 78: 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Provvidenti R, Alconero R (1988) Inheritance of resistance to a lentil strain of pea seed-borne mosaic virus in Pisum sativum. J Hered 79: 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Provvidenti R, Alconero R (1988) Inheritance of resistance to a third pathotype of pea seed-borne mosaic virus in Pisum sativum. J Hered 79: 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Provvidenti R (1990) Inheritance of resistance to pea mosaic virus in Pisum sativum. J Hered 81: 143–145.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schroeder WT, Provvidenti R (1968) Resistance of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to the PV2 strain of bean yellow mosaic virus conditioned by the single dominant gene By. Phytopathology 58: 1710.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Taiwo MA, Gonsalves D, Provvidenti R, Thurston HD (1981) Partial characterization and grouping of isolates of blackeye cowpea mosaic and cowpea aphid-borne mosaic viruses. Phytopathology 72: 590–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yen DE, Fry PR (1956) The inheritance of immunity to pea mosaic virus. Aust J Agric Res 7: 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zaumeyer WJ (1957) Bean diseases and methods for their control. USDA Tech Bull 868.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hampton, R.O., Provvidenti, R. (1992). Specific infectivity and host resistance have predicated potyviral and pathotype nomenclature but relate less to taxonomy. In: Barnett, O.W. (eds) Potyvirus Taxonomy. Archives of Virology, vol 5. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6920-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6920-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82353-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6920-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics