Lowering the Threshold: A Comparative Overview of AIDS Prevention Among Injecting Drug Users Using Outreach Technology

  • C. D. Kaplan
Conference paper


This paper provides an overview of AIDS prevention among drug users in the European and American context. The most recent epidemiological data in Europe and America indicate that drug users are the group greatest at risk to contract the HIV virus. Accumulating evidence shows that spread if HIV virus is associated with specific socio-ecological units such as neighbourhoods and social networks. These data support the idea that the prevention of the spread of the HIV in the drug users population should be focussed on specific geographical areas and on social networks. Outreach technology has been developed involving the use of indigenous drug users working in their own neighbourhoods and within their own networks together with professional health promotion workers. The technology of outreach is also associated with the concept of self organization drawn from the ecological sciences. This technology aims at lowering the threshold between relevant services and information and the drug user population. To illustrate this approach data is presented from the ‘Boule de Neige’ intervention project in the Euro-region of Germany, The Netherlands, Belgium and the Chicago Outreach Intervention Project.


Drug User Inject Drug User Methadone Maintenance Treatment Drug Policy Needle Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Global program on AIDS (progress report November 4). In: AIDS, drugs and prostitution, edited by Plant M. Tavistock, London, 1990Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buning E. Outreach work with drug users: an overview. Int J Drug Policy 4: 78–80, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wodak A. A Dutch smorgasbord: research on HIV/AIDS and injecting drug users. Int J Drug Policy 4: 5–27, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Houk van de J A R, Coutinho R A, Haastrecht van H J A, et al.. Prevalence and risk factors among drug users and drug using prostitutes in Amsterdam. AIDS 2: 55–60, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedman S. Going beyond education to mobilizing subcultural change. Int J Drug Policy 4: 91–95, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaplan C D, Vries de M W, Grund J P C, et al.. Protective factors: Dutch interventions, health determinants and the reorganization of addict life. In: Drug misuse and dependence, edited by Ghodse H A, Kaplan C D, Mann R D. Carnforth, Lancs., 1990, pp 165–176.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaplan C D, Mercera B, Meulders W A J, et al.. The “Boule De Neige” project: lowering the threshold for AIDS prevention among injecting drug users. Int J Drug Policy 3: 170–175, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grund J P C. Drug use as a social ritual: functionality, symbolism and determinants of self-regulation, IVO Series, Rotterdam, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grund J P C, Blanken P. From chasing the dragon to chinezen: the diffusion of heroin smoking in The Netherlands, IVO Series, Rotterdam, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Odum H T. Self-organization, transformity and information. Science 242: 1132–1139, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raggia J A, Armentrout S L, Chou H H, et al.. Simple systems that exhibit self-directed replication. Science 259: 1282–1287, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. Kaplan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Psychosocial and Socioecological ResearchUniversity of LimburgMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations