Preserved, Allogeneic Bone Grafts in Orthopaedic Reconstructions

  • Janusz Komender
  • Hanna Malczewska
  • Andrzej Komender


Preserved allogeneic bone grafts have been used in orthopaedic reconstructions for many years [1,2,4,10,12]. Therapeutic effects of such transplantations have been reported in numerous papers [3,5–7,11,13,15]. General opinions about the effect of such transplantations are favorable. Literature reports have dealt mainly with the use of grafts in particular clinical situations and that do not permit the direct evaluation of the role of grafts. This study has been undertaken in our tissue bank to elucidate the role of preserved bone grafts based on a significant number of patients undergoing bone transplantation [9]. Having cooperation with nearly 200 hospitals throughout the country, we have selected patients from three units in which over 100 transplantations were performed in one year. The analysis covered approximately 45% of the patients operated in those units during that time. Data concerning 1014 patients have been collected. The mean age of patients was 14.3 years, with a very high standard deviation (S.D.) of 15.8 years. The prevailing diagnoses included congenital lesions (37.7%), benign tumors (18.3%) and scolioses (10.8%). Pathologic malformations requiring surgery were localized mainly in the hips (37.9%), vertebral column (25.6%) and femur (15.4%). The patients were examined 24 to 63 months after surgery. The effect of treatment and patient condition was determined by the same team that had performed the surgery. In this manner data on 1014 patients were collected. Some biological and clinical variables were coded and their correlations with the results of treatment were analysed. The following conclusions are based on this material.


Bone Graft Tissue Bank Unsatisfactory Result Bone Transplantation Freeze Bone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Burchardt H, Enneking WP (1978) Transplantation of bone. Surg Clin North Am 58: 403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burwell RG (1969) The fate of bone grafts. In: Apley AG (ed) Recent advances in orthopaedics. London: Churchill, p 115Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Czitrom AA (1992) Indications and use of morsellized and small-segment allograft bone in general orthopaedics. In: Czitrom AA, Gross AE (eds) Allografts in orthopaedic practice. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, p 47Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dodd CA, Fergusson CM, Freedman L, Houghton GR, Thomas D (1988) Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 70: 431Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedlaender GE (1987) Bone banking: In support of reconstructive surgery of the hip. Clin Orthop 225: 17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Head WC, Malinin TI, Berklacich F(1987) Freeze-dried proximal femur allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 215: 109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Komender J, Komender A (1977) Evaluation of radiation-sterilized tissues in clinical use. In: Gaughram ERL, Goudie AJ (eds) Sterilization of medical products by ionizing radiation. Montreal: Multiscience, p 188Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Komender J, Malczewska H (1981) Fitness for work after preseved bone transplantation. Arch Immunol Ther Exper 29: 535Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Komender J, Malczewska H, Komender A (1991) Therapeutic effects of transplantation of lyophylized and radiation-sterilized allogeneic bone. Clin Orthop 272: 38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kowalenko PP (1975) Kliniczeskaja Transplantologia. Rostowskie Kniznoje Izdat, p 188Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marczynski W, Tylman D, Komender J (1993) Frozen and radiation-sterilied allogenic biostatic bone grafts in the clinical use. In: Ricciardi L (ed) Recent advances in oral and orthopaedic prostheses: Bone implant interface. Milano: Pubblideale S.r.L., p 197Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melloning JT, Bowers GM, Cotton WR (1981) Comparison of bone graft materials. Part II. New bone formation with autografts and allografts: A histological evaluation. J Peridontol 52: 297Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller F, Sussman M, Stamp W (1984) The use of bone allograft: A survey of current practice. In: Jacobs RR (ed) Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Proc Internatl Conference, p 174Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pearson K (1904) On the theory of contingency. (Memoirs, Biometric series, No 1 ) London: Drapers, p 119Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zasadzki W (1991) The efficacy of application of lyophilized, radiation-sterilized bone graft in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 272: 82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janusz Komender
    • 1
  • Hanna Malczewska
    • 2
  • Andrzej Komender
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Transplantology, Central Tissue Bank in WarsawMedical School in WarsawWarsawaPoland
  2. 2.Department of Histology and EmbriologyMedical School in WarsawWarsawaPoland

Personalised recommendations