Skip to main content

Can We Define or Measure Manual Skills in Surgical Training?

  • Conference paper
Training in Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 69))

Summary

Neurosurgery requires manual dexterity. But should tests be devised to assess manual skills as part of a selection process for training or used as a means of determining surgical competence?

The paper debates this fundamental question and proposes that manual skills for neurosurgical tasks need to be defined within the overall context of a recognised and fully assessed training programme. The importance of training as a means of transferring competence, part of which is manual skills, is emphasised. In conclusion the paper points out the inadequacy of solely measuring manual skills, were it possible, in assessing neurosurgical competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Annett M, Kilshaw D (1983) Estimating the parameters of the distribution of L-R differences in male and females. Br J Psychol 74:253–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elliott M, Waldron JR, Anton BS (1995) Effects of exercise on dexterity. Percept Mot Skills 80:883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Graham JW (1972) Substitution of perceptional motor ability test for chalk carving in Dental Admission Testing Program. J Dent Educ 36:9–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hancock PT, Hockley HF (1984) The effects of stress on hu-man performance. Fearon Pitman, Belmont CA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neiss R (1988) Reconceptualying arousal: psychological states in motor performance. Psychol Bull 103:345–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patkin M (1965) The hand has two grips: an aspect of surgical dexterity. Lancet i:1384

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson S (1974) The ADA chalk Carving test. J Dent Educ 38:11–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salcman M (1992) The education of a neurosurgery: the two cultures revisited. Neurosurgery 31:686–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schueneman AL, Pickleman J, Hesslein R, et al (1984) Neuropyscholoigcal predictors of operative skill among gen-eral surgery residents. Surgery 96:288–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith BG (1976) The value of tests of spatial and psychomotor ability in selecting dental students. Br Dent J 141:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Squire D, Giachind AA, Profitt AW, et al (1989) Objective comparison of manual dexterity in physicians and surgeons. Can J Surg 32:467–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson GW, Ahlawat K, Buie R (1979) Evaluation of the dental aptitude test components as predictors for dental school performance. Can Dent Assoc J 45:407–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ulmer FC (1976) The wax carving test. Quintessence Dent Technol 1:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood Jones F (1949) Principles of anatomy as seen in the hand. Balliere, Tindall & Cox, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Neil-Dwyer, G., Lang, D.A. (1997). Can We Define or Measure Manual Skills in Surgical Training?. In: Reulen, HJ., Steiger, HJ. (eds) Training in Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 69. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6860-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6860-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7419-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6860-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics