Assessment of Training Progress and Examinations

  • J. T. Hoff
  • H. M. Eisenberg
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 69)


Board certification and accreditation of training programs began as measures of quality in the United States. Both functions were done initially by the American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS). In 1954, certification of trainees and accreditation of programs became separate functions in order to eliminate potential conflicts of interest.

Currently, the ABNS certifies trainees who have completed neurological surgery training in an accredited program whose curriculum includes operative and nonoperative experience, have the endorsement of the training program director, and have passed the written in-training examinations and a final oral examination. Accreditation of training programs is a separate function administered by the Residency Review Committee (RRC) of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Individual programs are reviewed on a periodic basis for quality of the curriculum, facilities, faculty, and patient volume. The ABNS and the RRC are separate groups, both comprised of neurosurgeons with a strong commitment to the educational process.


Certification accreditation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Board of Neurological Surgery Booklet of Information (1994, revised) ABNS, Houston, pp 18Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Graduate Medical Education Directory, 1995–1996 (1995) American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, pp 1123Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fulton JF (1946) Harvey Cushing. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, pp 754Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoff JT (1990) Subspecialty certification. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary S (eds) Neurosurgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 414–416Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoff JT (1995) Neurosurgical education. In: Awad I (ed) Phi-losophy of neurological surgery, chapter 12. AANS Press, Park Ridge, pp 137–144Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kline DG (1990) Fifty years of service to American neurological surgery: The American Board of Neurological Surgery. Privately published, Houston, pp 102Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Light RU (1992) Cushing’s handwriting and remembering Harvey Cushing: the closing years. Surg Neurol 37: 147–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahaley JS Jr, Kline DG (1990) The American Board of Neurological Surgery: an historical perspective. In: Kline DG (ed) Fifty years of service to American neurological surgery: The American Board of Neurological Surgery. Privately published, Houston, pp 6–8Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pevehouse BC (1984) Residency training in neurological surgery, 1934–1984: evolution over 50 years of trial and tribulation. The 1984 AANS Presidential Address. J Neurosurg 61: 999–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sachs E (1958) Fifty years of neurosurgery: a personal story. Vantage Press, New York, p 186Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turnbull F (1984) As it was in the beginning. In: Alexander E (ed) History of the Society of Neurological Surgeons. 75th Meeting Anniversary. Hunter Publishing, Winston-Salem, pp 4–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. T. Hoff
    • 1
  • H. M. Eisenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Michigan Medical CenterAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations