Advertisement

The Diquark Model for Exclusive Reactions

  • P. Kroll
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 11)

Abstract

The present status of the diquark model for exclusive reactions at moderately large momentum transfer is reviewed. That model is a variant of the Brodsky-Lepage approach in which diquarks are considered as quasielementary constituents of baryons. Recent applications of the diquark model, relevant to high energy physics with electromagnetic probes, are discussed.

Keywords

Form Factor Hard Scattering Large Momentum Transfer Exclusive Reaction Diquark Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G.P. Lepage and S.J. Brodsky: Phys. Rev. D22, 2157 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Anselmino, P. Kroll and B. Pire: Z. Phys. C36, 89(1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Kroll: Proceedings of the Adriatico Research Conference on Spin and Polarization Dynamics in Nuclear and Particle Physics, Trieste, 1988Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Kroll, W. Schweiger and M. Schürmann: Int. Jour, of Mod. Phys. A6, 4107(1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Jakob, P. Kroll, M. Schürmann and W. Schweiger: Z. Phys. A347, 109 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Kroll, Th. Pilsner, M. Schürmann and W. Schweiger: Phys. Lett. B316, 546 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Kroll, M. Schürmann and P. Guichon: Nucl. Phys. A598, 435 (1996)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Virchaux and A. Milsztajn: Phys. Lett. B274, 221 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Breakstone et al.: Z. Phys. C28, 335(1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Kroll, M. Schürmann and W. Schweiger: Z. Phys. A342, 429 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Bolz, P. Kroll and J.G. Körner: Z. Phys. A350, 145 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.M. Stuart et al.: Phys. Rev. D58, 032003 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Burkert and L. Elouadrhiri: Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3614 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.A. Shupe et al.: Phys. Rev. D19, 1921(1979)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.S. Kronfeld and B. Nižić: Phys. Rev. D44, 3445 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.V. Radyushkin: Phys. Rev. D58, 114008 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.R. Farrar et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2229 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Artuso et al. (CLEO collaboration): Phys. Rev. D50, 5484 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Hamasaki et al. (VENUS collaboration): Phys. Lett. B407, 185(1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Kroll
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich PhysikUniversität WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations