Advertisement

Amplitude Analysis

  • Ron Workman
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 11)

Abstract

Even if a ‘complete set’ of experimental observables were measured for the elastic scattering or photo/electroproduction of pseudoscalar mesons, ambiguities would remain in the extracted partial-wave and isospin decomposed amplitudes. As these problems are not widely understood, the present work outlines the way model-dependence enters into analyses of data from both hadronic and electromagnetic facilities.

Keywords

Elastic Scattering Pseudoscalar Meson Amplitude Analysis Born Term Theoretical Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Höhler: Pion-Nucleon Scattering. Edited by H. Schopper, Landolt-Börnstein, Vol. I/9b2 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.E. Bowcock and H. Burkhardt: Rep. Prog. Phys. 38, 1099 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Sabba Stefanescu: J. Math. Phys. 23, 1190 (1982)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Chadan and P.C. Sabatier: Inverse problems in quantum scattering theory. New York: Springer-Verlag 1989MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    While the work of Ref. [3] claims a unique solution in principle, whether current solutions are truly unique has recently been questioned by I.G. Alekseev et al., Phys. Rev. C55, 2049 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Note that forward and backward scattering are special cases for the amplitude reconstruction problem. For example, in πN scattering and photoproduction, the spin observables are either zero or ±1 at these angles. Therefore we need only a cross section measurement to determine these (essentially degenerate) transversity amplitudes up to an overall phase.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N.W. Dean and P. Lee: Phys. Rev. D5, 2741 (1972)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.-T. Chiang and F. Tabakin: Phys. Rev. C55, 2054 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Dmitrasinovic, T.W. Donnelly and F. Gross: Complete measurements of scalar and pseudoscalar electroproduction, in Research Program at CEBAF (III), RPAC III, edited by F. Gross (CEBAF, Newport News, 1988), p. 547Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    This is briefly discussed in Refs. [1] and [2]. A modern perspective is given by G. Baym: The physics of Hanbury Brown—Twiss interferometry: from stars to nuclear collisions, lectures at the XXXVII Zakopane School, June 1997; nucl-th/9804026Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Garcilazo, E.T. Boschitz, W. Gyles, W. List, C.R. Ottermann, R. Tacik, and M. Wessler: Phys. Rev. C39, 942 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    The neglect of high partial waves can alter the resulting low partial waves, as has been discussed by A. Donnachie: Rep. Prog. Phys. 36, 695 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13a.
    V.F. Grushin, A.A. Shikanyan, E.M. Leiken, and A. Ya. Rotvain: Yad. Fiz. 38, 1448 (1983)Google Scholar
  14. 13b.
    V.F. Grushin, A.A. Shikanyan, E.M. Leiken, and A. Ya. Rotvain: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 38, 881 (1983)Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    R.L. Workman: Phys. Rev. C56, 1645 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    I. Sabba Stefanescu: J. Math. Phys. 23, 1190 (1982), arguments were based on the assumed existence of cross section and P data, but not R and A data.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    I.S. Barker, A. Donnachie and J.K. Storrow: Nucl. Phys. B95, 347 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ron Workman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations