Advertisement

Results from proton-proton bremsstrahlung measurements at 190 MeV

  • H. Huisman
  • J. C. S. Bacelar
  • M. J. van Goethem
  • M. N. Harakeh
  • M. Hoefman
  • N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki
  • H. Löhner
  • J. G. Messchendorp
  • M. Seip
  • R. W. Ostendorf
  • S. Schadmand
  • R. Turrisi
  • M. Volkerts
  • H. W. Wilschut
  • A. van der Woude
  • R. Holzmann
  • R. Simon
  • A. Kugler
  • K. Tcherkashenko
  • V. Wagner
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 10)

Abstract

A series of bremsstrahlung measurements have been performed at KVI with the 190 MeV polarized proton beam of the new superconducting cyclotron AGOR. The aim of these measurements is to investigate the dynamics of interactions involving intermediate off-shell nucleons. Nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung is the most fundamental process used for such studies as it involves the strong interaction between two nucleons and the well-known electromagnetic interaction. The present experiment provides the most accurate experiment to date on the proton-proton system. The accuracy is high enough to investigate higher order effects such as the virtual Δ-isobar and meson exchange currents. Surprisingly, none of the microscopic calculations is able to describe the data both in magnitude and in shape.

Keywords

High Order Effect Microscopic Calculation Outgoing Proton Liquid Hydrogen Target Meson Exchange Current 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F.E. Low: Phys. Rev. 110, 974 (1958)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.H. Martinus, O. Scholten and J.A. Tjon: Phys. Rev. C 56, 2945 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    G.H. Martinus, O. Scholten and J.A. Tjon: accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. CGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki: Nucl. Phys. A 631, 242c (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    M. Volkerts et al.: submitted to Nucl. Instr. and Meth. (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, J. Mulder and J. Zijlstra: accepted for publication in Nucl. Instr. and Meth. (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    A.R. Gabler et al.: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 346, 168 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    M.K. Liou, R.G.E. Timmermans and B.F. Gibson: Phys. Rev. C 54, 1574 (1996); Phys. Lett. B 345, 372 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    J.R. Bergervoet et al.: Phys. Rev. C 41, 1435 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    J. Fleischer and J. Tjon: Nucl. Phys. A 84, 375 (1974); Phys. Rev. D 15, 2537 (1977); Phys. Rev. D 21, 87 (1980)Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    V. Herrmann and K. Nakayama: Phys. Rev. C 45, 1450 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    K. Nakayama: private communicationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Huisman
    • 1
  • J. C. S. Bacelar
    • 1
  • M. J. van Goethem
    • 1
  • M. N. Harakeh
    • 1
  • M. Hoefman
    • 1
  • N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki
    • 1
  • H. Löhner
    • 1
  • J. G. Messchendorp
    • 1
  • M. Seip
    • 1
  • R. W. Ostendorf
    • 1
  • S. Schadmand
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Turrisi
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. Volkerts
    • 1
  • H. W. Wilschut
    • 1
  • A. van der Woude
    • 1
  • R. Holzmann
    • 4
  • R. Simon
    • 1
  • A. Kugler
    • 1
  • K. Tcherkashenko
    • 5
  • V. Wagner
    • 5
  1. 1.KVIGröningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.GSIDarmstadtGermany
  3. 3.NPIŘež u PrahyCzech Republic
  4. 4.Physikalische InstitutGiessenGermany
  5. 5.GANILCaenFrance

Personalised recommendations